The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 23:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

El Porvenir, New Mexico[edit]

El Porvenir, New Mexico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A spot apparently in a larger locale with two campgrounds of the same name nearby (one forest service, the other private) and a mine, which may or may not be associated with our subject. All of this tends to clog searching. I did find one passing reference to it as a settlement but nothing of any substance, so I'm going to say it fails WP:GNG. Mangoe (talk) 21:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Keep This article makes it sound like El Porvenir is a settlement with a church and cemetery. There was a murder here in 1997. Another resident. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 00:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Keep WP:NEXIST thanks Eddy Lightburst (talk) 03:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as it exists, and thus meets geolandJackattack1597 (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.