The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:37, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bullet Force[edit]

Bullet Force (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article creator contested PROD. Non-notable video game with little to no independent sources that would establish notability under WP:GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- an "in universe" page with no independent sourcing and no assertion of notability or significance. Not suitable for inclusion at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As per nom. TheDeviantPro (talk) 10:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -almost A7, certainly U5: WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 14:28, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.