Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article MAX Light Rail, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the MAX Light Rail system in Portland, Oregon, includes North America's deepest transit station, at 260 ft (79 m) below ground? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MAX Light Rail. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, MAX Light Rail), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with... this GTFS source. Is it reliable for use on Wikipedia for the MAX Red Line length? Truflip99 (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would depend a lot on the publisher. I am not familiar with the organization behind that specific website, but I cannot find any information on who provided the information, how they know or who they are, and that makes the site appear somewhat dubious to me. transitq.com merely says "Hi." - that's not what I'd expect from the homepage of a reliable source. In general, the place to ask about the reliability of a source is WP:RSN. Huon (talk) 20:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely great work on the article. Keep up the exceptional work. I look forward to looking at future FA nominations from you. Stay safe.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kew Gardens 613: Thank you for taking a part in making it possible. I really appreciate it. I'm always available to help you out with anything you need here, so please don't hesitate to reach out. Good luck with your papers. --truflip99 (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping by to also say congratulations! Now we need to get Canada Line to FA so that all three major Cascadian cities will have excellent articles on their airport rail links. SounderBruce 08:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: I appreciate it! Thank you for all your help with the Portland-related articles and for being an inspiration for these expansions. And yes, totally up for that task. --truflip99 (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing! I'm loving your work on Portland public transit so much! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 12:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pioneer Square South and Pioneer Square North stations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Username6892 -- Username6892 (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hall/Nimbus station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hall/Nimbus station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hall/Nimbus station for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hall/Nimbus station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hall/Nimbus station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 06:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 12:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Truflip. FYI, if you are trying to repair broken links for old Portland Tribune (or other Pamplin papers) articles by looking for archived copies, here's a tip if the cited URL uses "thetribonline.com" or "thetribonline.net". Replace that portion with "www.portlandtribune.com" – and leave the rest of the URL unchanged – before doing a search in the Internet Archive. Often, one can find an archived copy that way. If it's another Pamplin paper, the same trick sometimes also works, if you know the right (old) URL: e.g. replacing "thetribonline" with "www.beavertonvalleytimes"[dot-com] for an article in that Pamplin paper. Sometimes, a WP article's edit history will show that the original edit citing the newspaper article used that old URL format and was changed to "thetribonline" version later, and that can be another way to find the original URL if you don't know it.

The "thetribonline" URLs were used by Pamplin for what turned out to by a relatively very brief period, in 2013, only temporarily during something like a website upgrade, and the URLs for the very same articles went back to the old format later, but the temporary "thetribonline" ones were deactivated, not made into redirects on the Pamplin site. If you try that trick and still don't find the article in the Internet Archive, I personally don't know of any alternative option; I consider that a dead-end when it happens. SJ Morg (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I figured out why that September 2000 Oregonian article that had been acting as one of our key citations to support TriMet's adoption of route colors for the MAX lines – which I have in my files as a literal clipping from the newsprint edition – has never appeared in the digitized archives of the paper at Multnomah County Library (via NewsBank). I recently came across some information in my personal files from that time, and I was reminded that The Oregonian article of 9/21/2000 said that the Airport Line would be Yellow and the Interstate Avenue line would be Red! That was 20 years ago, but my notes from the time reminded me that contacts at TriMet told me The Oregonian's report had been premature, not cleared with TriMet's media people, because the colors were not absolutely final yet. Not long after, TriMet swapped the planned colors for the Airport and (future) Interstate lines, but the paper never printed a corrected story (or, if they did, it was not digitized for the online archives that became available in 2010), nor did TriMet issue a news release about it. Unfortunately, I neglected to actually read the 2000 article anew when I used it as a citation for Wikipedia a couple of years back, since the headline appeared to convey so well the information that was been given in WP – and since I had completely forgotten that the newspaper got it wrong originally. My notes-to-self from November 2000 say The O. never ran a later story correcting the erred one or a story simply repeating the news in an updated context but with the correct colors, but it appears that that omission was probably TriMet's fault. The agency changed Interstate Avenue's planned color from Red to Yellow in order to avoid, in the inner-city residential areas that would be served by that line, any unintended-but-unwelcome association with the term "red-lining", and they probably didn't want The O. to run a story explicitly correcting the Sep. 2000 one, since they didn't want to call attention to their reasons for the color swap. But this is conjecture; I don't actually know for sure why the newspaper never ran a later story.

I have now located a replacement citation, from a British transit magazine, and replaced the non-supporting ref in the affected articles. Since very few WP readers can access it, and also in consideration of the above error, this time I have included an excerpt/"quote" within the citation template. I did not include the portion of the magazine's text actually giving the colors, because the excerpt is already long, but I can add it if you want. By the way, the 9/21/2000 Oregonian article remains accurate for the Blue Line, so technically it could still be used as a ref for WP text relating only to the Gresham–Portland–Hillsboro line being designated as the Blue Line, but I think it's best to avoid that. SJ Morg (talk) 10:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting if true, especially with what happened with Red Line (Sound Transit). Thanks for updating those sources! I think with the Selinger text, we don't need a longer quote from this source for any line. There are also plenty of other articles that support the colors. --truflip99 (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Loop Service you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Loop Service you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Loop Service for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 12:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you are probably still in the middle of editing Loop Service and maybe NS Line, and may be considering more image changes, but nevertheless I wanted to leave a brief comment about two recent image deletions you made. As it stands at the moment, the Loop Service article still has two photos of the Tilikum Crossing (which, BTW, I personally believe is much more commmonly referred to as "the Tilikum Crossing" rather than just "Tilikum Crossing") – which I consider appropriate (3 would be too many) – but now no photos of the long north–south sections along Grand and MLK following your removal of one. I concede there are very few photos of the latter on Commons, but I hope to add a few more in June (too busy right now). And your recent deletion at NS Line has had the same effect: You kept both of the photos on Northrup Street (both taken by me), but now no longer have any photo (except the Vintage Trolley one) to represent the long north–south section along 10th and 11th avenues which is the busiest part of the line. I know those image changes are just one small aspect of your recent editing and expansion of those two articles, which have greatly improved them, but I'm so busy in real life right now that I have not even looked at your other recent edits (but I'm not worried about them) and have only had time to make this simple observation on your recent image deletions. Cheers, SJ Morg (talk) 10:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did so as I've gotten a lot of reviews saying an article has too many pictures. Although, not sure what "too many" constitutes in wp, as there isn't a specific guideline. I would really appreciate it if you could add photos of MLK/Grand stations as there is still room in the Stations section of the Loop Service article that would look good with that. I had planned to do that before the pandemic as I work nearby, but alas. --truflip99 (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I finally found time to choose, name and upload some additional photos of streetcars and streetcar stops on the east side. If you look soon, you'll easily find them at the top of my Commons uploads page. I should also point out that one close-up photo of a stop on the CL Line (now the Loop Service), this one at NE 7th & Halsey, has been on Commons since 2013, in case you missed it. I am aware that the Loop Service article is slated to appear on the Main Page two days from now, so I tried to make these images available by then. However, I know that you cannot add more than 2-3 to the article, at most. And of course you are under no obligation to add any, but given your comment above, hopefully you'll want to use at least one or two. SJ Morg (talk) 11:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They look fantastic! I've added a couple. Feel free to change it up as you please. --truflip99 (talk) 15:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Your choices were good. I added one to better show the typical features/fittings of a station, but then was reminded that the same photo is in the parent article, so I removed it from Loop Service. SJ Morg (talk) 08:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pioneer Square South and Pioneer Square North stations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pioneer Square South and Pioneer Square North stations for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Username6892 -- Username6892 (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pioneer Square South and Pioneer Square North stations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pioneer Square South and Pioneer Square North stations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Username6892 -- Username6892 (talk) 02:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loop Service, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Portland Streetcar's Loop Service enabled the production of the first U.S.-built streetcars in nearly 60 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Loop Service. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Loop Service), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Congratulations on successfully bringing another Portland transit article up to Featured Article status, in this case MAX Yellow Line. I am very happy that you've brought nearly all of the main MAX and Portland Streetcar articles up to Good Article class, but it's especially impressive to make FA class, as you have now done with two MAX line articles (so far!). Nice work! SJ Morg (talk) 05:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SJ Morg: Thank you for the recognition! It has been and continues to be an absolute pleasure working on these articles. Cheers! truflip99 (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't have time for it until now, but I wanted to respond to your edit summary left here. I agree that my one-sentence explanation of the South/North name need not be included in the articles on the individual lines (especially given that the Yellow, Green, and Orange Line articles all have some history relating to that 1990s project!) as long as it is included in the parent MAX Light Rail article and in an article about the failed project, if one is ever written for WP. However, I take issue with you on two other points. First, that "official TriMet publication" to which you referred in your edit summary (the 50 Years book) is just one publication. I have countless others (from Tri-Met and Metro, which shared the planning) in my files from the period when it was an active project – including issues of the official project newsletter – that used a slash rather than a hyphen or dash, starting as early as fall 1993 and continuing for more than five years. Most just aren't online. If I recall correctly, The Oregonian originally wrote "South-North", but fairly quickly settled on "South/North" – presumably after noticing it was what TriMet and Metro were consistently using. (Of course, when describing the line, they wrote "north-south", as any normal person would do, but when referring to the project by name they wrote "South/North"). There is also this photo (which, BTW, I feel would be an appropriate inclusion in the Orange Line article once you have added some info. from 1995-98 to the relevant section [which currently has no images], which you already did at Yellow Line but which remains missing from the Orange article for now. It is even more relevant to the Orange Line than it is to the Green Line, but has some relevance to all three, and I am only talking about only a few sentences.) I wonder whether a standalone article on the South/North project might face a notability challenge, but I know you'll at least provide plenty of good sourcing if you ever create such an article. When you do the research, I predict that you'll find I am right about the slash-vs-hyphen thing, and please keep in mind that FUTON bias will skew your findings when doing research on something that was active mostly only in the pre-Internet era. However, if that does not happen, and you want to stick with "South–North" for the title, I probably won't object, considering that you're the person who will have done the vast majority of the work in compiling the article.

Second, The Oregonian only writes "light-rail" when using it as a compound modifier, in which the inclusion of the hyphen is correct. Examples include "light-rail planning", "light-rail controversy", "light-rail ridership", "light-rail funding", etc. Nowadays they never use it when "rail" is the noun, only when "rail" is part of an adjective. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, The O. was writing "light-rail line" and occasionally even just "light-rail" (as a noun), but that was usually when the term was still new and unknown to most readers (only two LRT systems in the entire country opened before Portland's), and it appears that the paper dropped the hyphen in constructions such as those several years ago. BTW, it is the same at The Columbian (even today): often hyphenating "light rail" when used as an adjective, but not otherwise, which is simply proper grammar. I am conservative when it comes to punctuation, and I concede that it has become much less common to hyphenate "light rail" when it is being used as a compound adjective, though personally I still support the hyphen in such cases (but would not argue about it at WP). But at the least, I felt that your swipe at The Oregonian over that point was unfair. (For the record, I do not work for The O. and I do not personally know anyone who does.) Anyway, "South/North" vs. "South–North" is hardly a major issue, but I did feel your edit summary warranted a reply. SJ Morg (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair points. I concede to the naming convention and will opt with "South/North". Thanks for clarifying all of this! --truflip99 (talk) 16:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, yes! That photo is fantastic. I'm really glad you took that. Will definitely use it. --truflip99 (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Happy editing. – SJ Morg (talk) 03:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 10 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 08:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for improving CTrain articles! It's also one of my favourite system too! Eric0892 (talk) 22:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that MAX Yellow Line has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 11 August 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 11, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, "about a service of TriMet's MAX Light Rail system in Portland, Oregon. It has one of the more eventful histories of any rail line in the city that started with attempts to build a bi-state "South–North Line" between Vancouver in Washington and Oregon City. The project failed thrice in 1995, 1996, and 1998. North Portland residents, still wanting to benefit from light rail, convinced TriMet to build just the segment of the South–North Line in their neck of the woods. To fund the project without costing tax payers, Portland created an urban renewal area. That same urban renewal area ended up displacing many of the local residents, mostly minorities. In 2008, Oregon and Washington tried to extend the line to Vancouver again with a freeway bridge megaproject. The project failed for the fourth time in 2013, but plans still exist."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the Main Page appearance! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Glad to have been able to get something Portland up there! --truflip99 (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me as well! Great work on this page. epicgenius (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Thank you! It of course wouldn't be up there without you so I really appreciate it. --truflip99 (talk) 21:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

Portland train travel

Thank you for quality articles about train transportation around Portland, such as MAX Yellow Line, MAX Red Line, MAX Blue Line and Beaverton Transit Center, requesting help from the GOCE team, for updating, expanding and reviewing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2430 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Wow, thank you! --truflip99 (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nono, you produced, I just looked around for 5 minutes, thanks to your well-organized user page. It became rare that a featured article is written by someone new, - I always love that especially! I will hopefully have one on 1 September, and a featured list on 21 August. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I'm happy to contribute. I look forward to seeing your work featured as well! --truflip99 (talk) 21:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of it is on the Main page almost daily, but rather the small stuff, DYK and RD, right now Erich Gruenberg. I tell myself to focus more on quality work, but people keep dying. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for MAX Orange Line, about "Portland's newest MAX extension, having opened in 2015. Its was built following two decades of failed attempts to expand light rail between Portland and Clackamas County. Part of the project saw the construction of Portland's newest Willamette River crossing, Tilikum Bridge, which is notably the country's first major "car-free" bridge (it only allows peds, bikes, and transit)."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Truflip99, the nominator has posted that they think this should be failed now, given your latest review post. Can you please take care of it? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the October 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on October 1, and will continue until the end of the month.

-- Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Came across Public transit in Columbus, Ohio and was surprised there is not a similar article for Public transit in Portland Oregon. Thought of you, if you're interested and willing. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: Thanks for the heads up! I actually have a different plan to create a History of rail transportation in Portland, Oregon. Not sure if I want to omit the "history" part. --truflip99 (talk) 18:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Truflip99, Sure. Do what you think is best, of course your article is focused on rail specifically, while 'public transit' is broader. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) We already have Transportation in Oregon and Rail transportation in Oregon, which both include a lot of related content (and the latter includes relevant rail transit, which is all located in the Portland metropolitan area) but are not very well developed and have been poorly maintained – e.g. it has often included content that was years out of date until I've updated it because no one else was doing it. I don't think we need another article that overlaps heavily with those when we clearly have too few editors around here currently who are willing or able to take the time to develop and maintain such articles. If you (Truflip) wanted to take it on, I've no doubt it would be well developed within a reasonably short time, but I wouldn't have time to help much at all, and (based on what I just wrote) I imagine you'd end up having to do most of the work by yourself. So, if you are more interested in doing a "History of rail ..." article, I think you should keep that on your to-do list for when you have the time and not add something like this if it was not already on your to-do list. It's not as though readers cannot find content on this subject on WP; it's just spread out over several articles. And one of the most important ones, TriMet, has long been in need of a lot of attention – and the fact that it has not received it supports my point about there being too few editors with the interest, the editing skills and (in my case) the time to address it. My two cents. SJ Morg (talk) 06:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MAX Orange Line you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 04:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article MAX Orange Line you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:MAX Orange Line for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baffle gab1978 - Thank you for your work! --truflip99 (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into Wikipedia - Editathon 2021 Friday, February 26, 2021, 1:00-5:00 PM PST with Oregon State University, Education Opportunities Program, and AfroCROWD Guest Speaker: Spelman College's Alexandria Lockett "Click here to register directly on OSU's site".

Cascadia Wikimedians placed this banner at 03:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC) by using the Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland/Participants list.
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland, please add or remove your name here.

In reverting your revert on MAX Orange Line my edit summary didn't really address yours. Please say more about why Line is capped in the Failed South/North proposal. Dicklyon (talk) 03:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MAX Yellow Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan Area Express.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Truflip99! The article you nominated, MAX Orange Line, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, congrats! Well done! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto from me. Nice work. SJ Morg (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the MAX Orange Line article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 10, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 10, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just saw MAX Orange Line, whose GAN I reviewed months ago, got to TFA; congrats! I was just scrolling through the GAN and saw a line where you said I can reach out if I need help, so... there's a peer review I opened some time ago and it hasn't seen any comments; if you can feel free to comment on it. That is, if you are comfy with it. Thanks! GeraldWL 16:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MAX Orange Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northwest University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mall/Southwest 4th Avenue and Mall/Southwest 5th Avenue stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bicycle rack.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On, Friday, February 25, 2022, Oregon State University will be hosting an online editathon focused on Black history of the Pacific Northwest. You can learn more here and/or register here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! An Art+Feminism Wikipedia edit-a-thon will be held in Portland, Oregon, on March 12, 2022. Learn more here!

Wikipedia is one of the most-visited sites on the internet—and it’s created by people who volunteer their time to write and edit pages. Learn how to edit Wikipedia and be a part of shaping our understanding of our world. In this workshop, volunteer Wikipedia editors will be on hand to train participants on how to get started editing pages and offer ideas for which pages you can pitch in to help improve. Show up at any point during the four hours to get started!

Also: Free burritos!! We will be providing vegan, vegetarian, and meat burritos from food cart Loncheria Las Mayos. Alder Commons has a large, fenced playground. Children are welcome! Some computers will be available to borrow, but if you have a laptop, please bring it to use. We will also be leading an online training for new editors at 11am-12pm PST. Please feel free to join that training if you are not able to show up IRL.

This event is part of the international month of events organized by Art+Feminism, which is building a community of activists committed to closing information gaps related to gender, feminism, and the arts, beginning with Wikipedia. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Truflip99! The article you nominated, A and B Loop, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Truflip99! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Compilation of sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TMTC bullet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for A and B Loop, "about a service of the Portland Streetcar system in Portland, Oregon, U.S. It is a vital transit option in the Central City district, with connections to many of Portland's most iconic landmarks and institutions. The route itself is notable for operating the first U.S.-built streetcar in 60 years at the time of its opening."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frequent Express you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:41, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Frequent Express you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frequent Express for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Frequent Express you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frequent Express for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Congratulations on bringing Frequent Express to GA! I've had so little time for editing lately that I hadn't noticed just how much time you've spent on that article, and did not even realize it was ready for nomination – and suddenly I find that it has made Good article class. Nice work. SJ Morg (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frequent Express, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that women- and minority-owned businesses built the Frequent Express high-capacity bus line in Portland, Oregon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frequent Express. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frequent Express), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MAX Light Rail RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 for User:Doug Coldwell. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page; in particular, see Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment/February 2023#DC GAs not on original 223 list. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OJMCHE

The Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education (OJMCHE), in partnership with social practice artist Shoshana Gugenheim and as part of the Art+Feminism Project, will host an International Women's Day Wikipedia Edit-a-thon to edit and/or create Wikipedia articles for Jewish women artists. The event will be held at the museum on Sunday, March 10 from 11am-3pm PDT. Pre-registration is preferred but not required. Members of the public are invited to come to the museum to learn about the editing process, its history, its impact, and how to do it. We aim to collaboratively edit/enter Jewish women artists into the canon. An experienced regional Wikipedian will provided will be on site to teach, support, and guide the process. Participants can select artists ahead of time or on site. Please visit this link to RSVP and the Wikipedia meetup page for more information. Thanks!

Art+Feminism

Cascadia Wikimedians placed this banner at 22:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC) by using the Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland/Participants list.
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland, please add or remove your name here.