Hello, SuperMarioOdyssy101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Broodals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SuperMarioOdyssy101. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Broodals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, some time since I have been here SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 02:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for working to revert vandalism! Please make sure that when you undo vandalism you also warn the user on their talk page. Twinkle can help you do this. Thanks, Ankermast (talk) 04:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 04:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DONT YOU DARE TO REVERT 103.241.36.130 (talk) 01:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request the page to be moved, instead of adding red links SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OMFG WHAT HAVE YOU DONE 103.241.36.130 (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REVERT 103.241.36.130 (talk) 01:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fine SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 01:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REVERT CHANGES NOW 180.235.107.155 (talk) 06:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Tangiwai disaster, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Please use New Zealand English. Feel free to revert if you want. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 02:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NEVER 180.235.107.155 (talk) 06:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God, leave me alone man, I’ve gone through so much joining the site that I don’t know if I can continue for much longer SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out on rcp, here's a cookie for you! (other virtual foods are available if you don't like cookies :) ) Shaws username . talk . 01:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tysm SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 04:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please take halal Skibbert (talk) 04:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me it SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 04:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean halal?SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 06:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have work sandbox and reverted my edit. 118.172.29.204 (talk) 04:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 04:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SuperMarioOdyssy101 - I believe that my edit was removed in error. My intention was to remove irrelevant information that expanded on Candace Owen's comments and speculated about her intentions, as well as to clarify and neutralize the language in the first sentence. I didn't use language that wasn't neutral or supported by the sources, I removed language that was. Francis394 (talk) 02:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I restored your edit, I’m very sorry I did that SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 02:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Francis394 (talk) 02:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 02:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The theories regarding Frankism do not qualify as conspiracy theories by any metric, much less Wikipedia's. It may have been poorly worded, but that additional information does add relevant and fair context to Candance Owens as well as to the reality of how little widespread the theories are. Gurgenheimer (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 20:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While there may be theories regarding Frankism that are legitimate, the source cited is a peer-reviewed article entitled, "Antisemitic conspiracy fantasy in the age of digital media: "Three 'conspiracy theorists' and their YouTube audiences". There is no source that indicates that no theories regarding Frankism are conspiracy theories, therefore the claim that theories regarding Frankism are not conspiracy theories cannot be supported. Furthermore, Wikipedia's policy regarding conspiracy theories states that fringe theories should not be included along with mainstream views, to avoid giving undue weight to unfounded claims: "We do not take a stand on these issues as encyclopedia writers, for or against; we merely omit this information where including it would unduly legitimize it, and otherwise include and describe these ideas in their proper context concerning established scholarship and the beliefs of the wider world." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view). Additionally, the context provided here for Candace Owens' comments uses subjective language. What is the source that supports the claim that Candace Ownes is "is very careful to distance Frankism from Judaism and Jews, likely to defend herself from accusations of antisemitism." How does the editor know that she is careful, or what her motivations are? Subjective and unsupported language is used in the first sentence as well, with the claim that "theories have survived." The word "survived" is an unclear term with varied implications. The language should support the information presented in the cited material, which states that a conspiracy theory regarding this topic was posted to YouTube in 2016.

Because of Wikipedia's policy not to give undue weight to fringe theories, the entire section should be removed. Francis394 (talk) 00:57, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We've had a lot of vandals today/tonight and I've noticed a lot of welcome messages from you. It's great that you're making the effort.

Can I ask that you do a quick check on what they're editing as I've noticed a few welcome messages posted after they have vandalised articles. Maybe a quick look at their edits first before welcoming them.

Thank you! Knitsey (talk) 04:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got another question, I’ve started to check the contributions, do I warn someone for vandalism or use the {{welcomevandal}} template? SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 14:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]