Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shambuka have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shambuka was changed by Ss125 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940315 on 2021-11-30T15:01:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shambuka. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Isabelle ^🔔 15:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shambuka, you may be blocked from editing. Isabelle ^🔔 15:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shambuka. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ss125! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't agree with contents of page and its hurtful to my religion . Ss125 (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shambhuk's existance is not evidence based and his stories are insults to our God Ss125 (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is written by people from all over the world, with viewpoints that can be radically different than your own. If you disagree with content on the project, then provide reliable, secondary sources that support your position. Continuing to insert your own assertions, without citations, will result in your being blocked. You've already received a final warning for this, and have already violated that warning. I could block you now. But, I'm giving you a chance here. How you act will decide what happens next. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]