Anything that we upload belongs to us. There are no copyright violations. Please restore whatever it is that you have deleted Seanor32 (talk) 19:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seanor32, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Travelers' tales, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 21:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC) P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Lawrence v. Texas appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Mutinus (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Lawrence v. Texas appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lawrence v. Texas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mutinus (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should be using the Discussion page for Lawrence v. Texas to discuss your objections. There are many complicated points already made in the entry, some of which need citations. There are many ways to contribute, but adding a personal essay isn't quite the right way to proceed. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lawrence v. Texas. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Valenciano (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Lawrence v. Texas. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- gtdp ^(T)/_(C) 13:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reported you here for breach of the 3RR that I advised you about above. Valenciano (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  20:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the report for details.  Sandstein  20:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Lawrence v. Texas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AV3000 (talk) 02:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]