An article you recently created, XHPBPE-FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, XHPBJR-FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, XHSJR-FM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 19:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reliable secondary sources that have written in-depth about the station. Existing is not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XHPBPE-FM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MEXDOOMER1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reliable secondary sources that have written in-depth about the station. Existing is not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XHPBJR-FM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm Sammi Brie, and I created most of Wikipedia's infrastructure about Mexican radio in the middle of the last decade.

I wanted to explain something that may not be immediately apparent to a new editor: We have too many station articles. A 2021 proceeding tightened the sourcing requirements for radio stations to require significant coverage in reliable sources. This is going to be difficult on two fronts for a lot of Mexican stations:

• One is understandable. There is little newspaper or pre-internet sourcing available for stations that existed prior to 2000. I'm willing to excuse this because in some cases notability comes from age in radio. (This is why I work on American stations for Good and Featured Articles; this paper is much more available.)
• The other is much harder to overcome. Stations created in the last 10 years (e.g. out of IFT-4 or IFT-8) generally will not have quality sourcing. There are, of course, exceptions (XHCSAG-FM), but in my experience, the source quality comes down to some blogs, etc. I've also seen some low-tier news outlets regurgitate stories from others. These are the more clear-cut cases where articles should be switched to redirects.

This is the reason that your drafts are being rejected. It's also a problem affecting US small-market radio and TV stations basically on a rolling basis. The best practice would be to redirect call signs of clearly non-notable stations to the state list. You'll notice some state lists I got around to reformatting (Querétaro is one of these) to remove the "many separate tables" style adapted from the Spanish Wikipedia. The inclusion of name and format lines is partly to make state list redirection a more viable option for Mexican radio stations. The others should adopt this format, too.

If you have questions—in English or Spanish—don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]