Talk

Hello, Lollipoplollipoplollipop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aliens Deportation Act 1948 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p109651/mobile/ch01s02.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 23:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lollipoplollipoplollipop - just a tip that Australian legal case names use the abbreviation "v" not "vs" (and not "v." either). I've fixed this for O'Keefe v Calwell for you. Bookscale (talk) 09:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treaty of Friendship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Moscow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colonial preference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonial preference until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep making Wikipedia green. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 11:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man! Lollipoplollipoplollipop (talk) 12:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lollipoplollipoplollipop! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 07:29, Thursday, March 19, 2020 (UTC)

	Hello Lollipoplollipoplollipop, Bri has given you this WikiLove template, for being a great collaborator at WP:420! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else this WikiLove template! Enjoy! Thanks for creating a new article! ☆ Bri (talk) 00:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esperanza y Cia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vizcaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever list you're working off, you might want to review your recent edits that claimed Swansea[1] and Colwyn Bay[2] were in England. Number 57 11:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, whoops, my bad, good catch // Lollipoplollipoplollipop :: talk 12:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't know if its a biggie, but this one has "competition" spelt incorrectly...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Commanding heights of the economy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital platform.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of participants to Paris Peace Conference, 1919–1920, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hermann Müller and Henry White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

180.254.105.255 has given you a cupcake! Cupcakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cupcake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are this information based on true facts? 2A02:3035:406:D7F1:2DD6:EE24:A5C:91FD (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really like how that little table is looking in the Article 4 section. Fephisto (talk) 00:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely, yea. It might be worth having a separate column for what the outcome of each instance was. For example the 2003 consultation resulted in NATO cutting off cooperation with Russia. I removed the Cuban Missile Crisis from the table because it wasn't invoked then, but there does seem to be interesting literature about why it wasn't invoked, which may be useful to add: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1224&context=eilr, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2152053 //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 12:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good idea, let me give it a shot. Regarding the Cuban Missile Crisis, what do you think was going on with that other source I found from the National Security Council (that's a pretty good competing source, right?)? I saw that the NATO ambassador Finletter was ordered to convene, so I treated that as an Article 4 invocation. Your second source is interesting, so let me hold off until I can get access to the full version, but I'd like to see it to doublecheck through it. I also wonder if there were past invocations, but we just don't know about them because they haven't been declassified yet, or how many of these sources have kept up with recent declassifications. Fephisto (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to move the Cuban Missile Crisis discussion over to the Treaty talk page because that source you found should be kept in the record over there. Fephisto (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lollipoplollipoplollipop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of currency pair nicknames, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lollipoplollipoplollipop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of currency pair nicknames".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Lollipop, Given our recent tag-team on List of military alliances, I was wondering if would you want to help expand Franco-Greek Defence Cooperation Pact? I just made it a little bit ago. I plan on submitting it for a WP:DYK in the next couple of days, if you want to help expand it then we can both get credit for it :). —  dainomite   19:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dainomite, I made a couple little changes, but I'm not really interested in DYKs, or modern treaties to be honest - I prefer my alliances historical. Good luck though. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 22:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You bet, thanks! —  dainomite   00:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am user:Soap typing on an alternate account which I use on mobile devices. I acquired both names at a time when the namespace was not yet so crowded.

I read Wikipedia and Wiktionary quite a lot on my tablet and phone, but since I rarely edit from them, ive been offering to give up this username in favor of something more humble for several years now. Nobody has yet taken me up on the offer, and perhaps most people just don't think about usernames that much, but when I saw you posting I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask if you wanted this name that I really don't need. All i would need to do is change a few dozen talkpage signatures from this name to Soap.

Let me know if you are interested.

Best regards, Lollipop (talk) 08:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC) (Soap)[reply]

Thanks, interesting offer. Can't say I care. Keep it. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 12:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Lollipoplollipoplollipop. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lollipoplollipoplollipop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Good guy with a gun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disturb you, but I saw you active at List of military alliances. Can you also take a look about the List of military alliances page from time to time, seems to couple of editors really want to make a mess and add stuff that are not military alliances by every cost. I noticed that there is some trend, you know, promotion of certain organizations, to are defense or military alliances to give them higher weight or so, and that has some fans what push it and I suspect it is motivated or represent someone's private views or wishes but that is not for encyclopedia. We here don't do any promotion or advocacy so. For me it is pretty clear, there is the article and article topic and eventual talk page for consensus and that is it. Nubia86 (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, it's pretty inevitable that a page like List of military alliances will attract those sorts of editors. I do still have that page on my watchlist but almost always the bad edits have been reverted before I could have a look. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 14:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your answer.😊 Nubia86 (talk) 14:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abortion in Colorado, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I started an RFC I think you are interested in but my pinging failed at least it did on my end. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Lollipoplollipoplollipop, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Ezra Cricket (talk) 23:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Lollipoplollipoplollipop! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:52, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Lollipoplollipoplollipop for collecting more than 10 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]