Hi Gvpgirl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that the group Sandy Hook Promise likely merits its own article at Wikipedia, your article does not yet meet the criteria to be published. What you have done in changing a redirect into a full article is essentially creating a new article. I recommend you go through the normal WP:AFC process for this: create a draft (Draft:Sandy Hook Promise). There you can develop the draft, and solicit suggestions for improvement (or even help from other editors) to fine-tune the article until it is ready for publication. Specifically, you'll need much more evidence of coverage in independent third-party sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful feedback. Just want to get the facts out there! Gvpgirl (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I see that the problem is that you haven't formatted your references correctly. I'm working on expanding your article with proper referencing. Let's see where that goes. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will warn you: in the future, behavior such as you exhibited today ("my version is right, so I'm going to ignore people who revert my edits") is called edit warring and it can get you blocked. When you find that your edits are reverted, the best thing to do is to enter into a discussion (preferably on the article's talk page) inquiring why your edits were reverted so that you and the reverting editors can come to an agreement on how to best move forward. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So helpful! I think I added the references the right way. Alot of people are mean about Sanyd hook. like Alex Jones conspiracy people who say sandy hook was a hoax. i thought people were trolling the page because they kept making it disappear. sorry Gvpgirl (talk) 21:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sandy Hook Promiseis not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]