Welcome!

Hello, Bouldergeist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Judicial tyranny. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  02:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the deletion template was inadvertent; I merely restored an entry which was deleted without proper discussion. I'm still learning what Wikipedia can do, and how it does it. Bouldergeist (talk) 22:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor believes that your additions to the Judicial activism article are too essay-like, are non-neutral, and include original research. I have only managed to partly investigate these claims as of yet, but it may be best if you are careful to avoid adding text with these problems and/or explain why you disagree if you disagree on the talk page. Thanks. Dustin (talk) 18:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, please take more care to avoid adding links to disambiguation pages. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• FYI, one of the easiest ways to find and fix all of the disambiguation links in an article is to use the dabsolver - http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/view/Dab_solver - Cheers! bd2412 T 18:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If anything sounds like it has been written by yours truly, it is mostly because I just haven't gotten around to amassing the appropriate scholarship. A typical example is the sentence in parends in the Judicial Inactivism subsection, where just the citations to the pertinent scholarship were several pages long thirty years ago.Bouldergeist (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Bouldergeist[reply]