Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Hello, Appm032021, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by JavaHurricane was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Blatant advertisement.
JavaHurricane 04:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Appm032021! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JavaHurricane 04:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah Pvt. Ltd. (March 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah Pvt. Ltd. (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still unsourced - "Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic" (see WP:42)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah Pvt. Ltd. (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:NCOMPANY before resubmitting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 10:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah Pvt. Ltd. (March 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 04:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Contents have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 12:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Appm032021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has been blocked because we have created another account on Wikipedia. But, I want to let you know that at the time when I have created another account I didn't know about Sock puppet policy of Wikipedia. I have created another account because I was getting a lot of issue such as the article is not constructive, not proper reliable sources, and the article is not constructive. After getting so much issues, I started reading all the guidelines of Wikipedia and I got to know that I was doing a lot mistakes that were violating Wikipedia policies. So, I thought to create a new account for a fresh start but after creating the new account, both the account got blocked. I haven't created the another account for publishing any wrong/duplicate content on Wikipedia, the main motto was just a fresh start so that I don't violate any Wikipedia policies from the new account. If you want I can also delete the another account and I will try my best to not violate any other Wikipedia policies. Thanks Appm032021 (talk) 10:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request to the one below - closing. SQLQuery Me! 20:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appm032021 (talk) 10:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC) [reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Appm032021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has been blocked because we have created another account on Wikipedia. But, I want to let you know that at the time when I have created another account I didn't know about Sock puppet policy of Wikipedia. I have created another account because I was getting a lot of issue such as the article is not constructive, not proper reliable sources, and the article is not constructive. After getting so much issues, I started reading all the guidelines of Wikipedia and I got to know that I was doing a lot mistakes that were violating Wikipedia policies. So, I thought to create a new account for a fresh start but after creating the new account, both the account got blocked. I haven't created the another account for publishing any wrong/duplicate content on Wikipedia, the main motto was just a fresh start so that I don't violate any Wikipedia policies from the new account. If you want I can also delete the another account and I will try my best to not violate any other Wikipedia policies. Thanks Appm032021 (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You knew perfectly well about WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, having been blocked for this before and promising not to do so again. You've demonstrated we cannot trust you and it will be hard for you to earn back the trust of the community. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO with your original account. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Appm032021 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I am new on Wikipedia and I was not aware about the process to edit the pages. I was edit my content and suddenly get blocked. I tried to be unblock but I failed then I created a new account and now I get blocked from both account. Sorry to say but on Wikipedia page the direction and guidance is very scattered. I am not able to find solution of my issues. Plaese unblock me so I can continue my work. Appm032021 (talk) 09:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I concur that your best bet is to do as Yamla suggests. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Appm032021