Hello! I noticed your contributions to Julian Assange and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have an account. It is easier to be an anon with a shifting IP address. Stops all the crap from the editors who treat WP like social media. 101.98.39.246 (talk) 09:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to do some reading up on how the categories work

You first, new guy. --Calton | Talk 07:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nope. been here a long time.

Ah, editing while logged-out to avoid scrutiny, I see. When were you originally blocked, then? --Calton | Talk 09:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yOU ARE MAKING AN ASSUMPTION THAT i AM BLOCKED. 101.98.39.246 (talk) 00:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like other editors are happy with my edit on Cannabis in Japan.

You need to work on those mind-reading skills. --Calton | Talk 09:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Odd comment. You need to work out what is best for WP instead of doing unthinking reverts. 101.98.39.246 (talk) 00:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NonsensicalSystem. I noticed that you recently removed content from Māori and conservation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NonsensicalSystem^(error?)_(.log) 08:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove those links? Also tune down your edit summaries, there's no need to get so aggressive over a list of links. NonsensicalSystem^(error?)_(.log) 08:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FFS! Read the WP:MOS. As an editor you should know it. Ok, I will tell you. THe links are redundant or tenuous or random. 101.98.39.246 (talk) 08:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fine. You could have just put that in the edit it summary instead of swearing at thin air, but whatever. NonsensicalSystem^(error?)_(.log) 08:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am agressive because I am pissed off. A potentially good resource like WP is being stuffed up by bad editing and editors. 101.98.39.246 (talk) 08:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries, you may be blocked from editing. In what world do you think this is appropriate? AusLondonder (talk) 17:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Failing to reply here and instead repeating your unacceptable behaviour? Edit-warring and using abusive edit summaries like this? This is your final warning. Keep this up and you'll be reported to WP:ANI. AusLondonder (talk) 06:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]