This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hinduism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am born Bramhin. I am Kanyakubja Bramhin. My gotra is Upamanyu. I write my surname "Bajpai". Some writes "Vajpayee" / "vajpai" / "Vajpeyi" etc. It dose not matter, who is writting in english language the word Vajpeya. My priest told me that your veda is Yajurveda and this is the veda for all bajpais.

user:Dbbajpai1945@sify.com 10:59 PM IST 02 September 2006

I've just reverted a rather implausible change to the age of the manuscript, but I see that the age given in the article currently is cited to Witzel (1991), which is missing from the list of sources. Is this a typo or a genuine omission? The same source is used in Atharvaveda and Rigveda, and is missing from both of those articles too. Pinging @Joshua Jonathan. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 10:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wham2001: * Witzel, Michael (2001), "Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts" (PDF), Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 7 (3): 1–115 p.5. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank-you! I have made the necessary updates. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article makes a lot of confusing and possibly erroneous claims. One which is definitely wrong is the claim that the Shatapatha Brahmana is a part of the yajurveda. This is patently false. It is a commentary/manual text on the yajurveda but it is a separate text. It also states that the upanishads are a part of the YV, which is also likewise just as false. It makes understanding the article very difficult. Please correct it. 2409:4042:4E8E:E9A8:0:0:EA48:720D (talk) 14:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Arjuna followed the horse used for Aswameda Yaga.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here it seems like the perspective is completely Western so we can add native perspective along with the existing perspective. Ex:Arya is a race in West,Arya means Noble in the east. Rajeshfadnavis (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]