Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review shortly! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

review

This is a really nice article, clear and concise, describing a specific incident. I have been through the article and made a couple of copy edits.[1]

I have just one question before I complete the review. In the lede it says: "The governor of the colony, Étienne Périer, was recalled to France in 1733." However, this isn't followed up in the body of the article. Why was he recalled?

MathewTownsend (talk) 18:48, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done [2] --Jsayre64 (talk) 23:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

   b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:

   b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   c. no original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   no edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Very nice images

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the review! Jsayre64 (talk) 23:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]