This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Atheism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page. Quick help Project's main talk page Article layout Links to atheism-related information · List of free online resources Writing about religion · Article development Citing sources · Verifying sources · About original research Assume good faith · Be civil Recent activity Core articles the "Atheism" article Articles recently added to Category:Atheism To do edit history watch purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold. Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members. Help with articles. See this month's adopt-an-article. Help out with this to-do list. Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles). Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box) Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it. Maintenance, etc. Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references). Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process). Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly. Always write for an encyclopedia. Articles to improve Agnosticism Create Articles on notable atheists Expand an atheism stub Immediate attention State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments. False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes. Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century. Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Creationism: Intelligent design Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Intelligent design task force (assessed as Low-importance). Skepticism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

	Flying Spaghetti Monster has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 23, 2005 Articles for deletion Kept October 26, 2006 Good article nominee Listed February 9, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted September 20, 2009 Good article nominee Not listed January 6, 2010 Good article nominee Listed December 10, 2012 Peer review Reviewed May 24, 2013 Featured article candidate Not promoted Current status: Good article

Why keep deleting the various church links? FSMdeaf0ne (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to have to amplify and make clear what the issue is. By opening an RFC, you're inviting comments from people who mostly aren't familiar with the edit history of this page. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 15:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the RfC tag. This does not rise to the point of a community-wide RfC, it's not really presented as one, and the question has been sufficiently answered below. SkyWarrior 16:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are "unnecessary" RFCs that big a deal? It's not like I minded getting notified for this one. And I always have the option of ignoring Yapperbot, which I often do. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can help by pointing to this edit, which I think is the reason for the RfC, and which shows the ELs that were deleted: [2]. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Per WP:ELPOINTS #3, we generally want to keep links to a minimum. Although this page is, by its nature, lighthearted, it doesn't add much encyclopedic value to link to multiple FSM-related websites that do not have WP:SECONDARY source coverage. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Basically, you're saying Wikipedia is not a link farm. I concur. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article contains many instances of incorrect punctuation, particularly at the end of a sentence; namely a period following a quote sign, rather than a period followed by a quote sign. Example (first paragraph of the article: incorrect (as currently appears) -- "... as any other"; corrected version -- "... as any other." 75.161.225.119 (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per mos:logical, that's actually the correct way to do it cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 not done per previous comment cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The church of the FSM creates a new god as a part of its religion every year. These are recorded on the relevant Facebook page. Is there any way a list of these new gods could be included in the wiki page for the FSM itself. 2A02:C7C:B412:800:2D83:E4C7:6D26:E3FA (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]