This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force. Soviet Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force World War II task force

• Argee. Bukvoed 07:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree, it is good that all these Russian Military and History articles go together, we are appeasing armchair generals everywhere Verdafolio 17:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How does the table "allow direct comparison with foreign artillery" when no one else measures by those standards? 90deg angle and 50% chance of penetration is going to result in far more optimistic numbers than you would get using the rating system used by other organizations. For example I believe the Germans measured from a 30% strike and 70% odds of penetration. So if it says "120mm at 500m" that means at least 70% of hits will result in a penetration at 500m. If only half of the shells need to penetrate to count then obviously the armor can be thinner. Idumea47b (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]