This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 30 October 2023[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Move to 2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus. There is clear and undisputed SNOW support for moving the page, and there is a growing consensus to use "antisemitic" instead of "Anti-Jewish", including by the nominator. (non-admin closure) ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
2023 wave of antisemitism in the North Caucasus → 2023 North Caucasus anti-Jewish riots – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONCISE. Not so much a "wave" as a multi-day set of riots. "Anti-Jewish riots" seems to be the common phrase used in RS: NYT, Kyiv Independent, Barron's, Haaretz, among others Longhornsg (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support, more formal and more accurate Unknown-Tree (talk) 15:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support--— Osama Eid (talk) 16:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support for "2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus", because "antisemitic" is a more established form for "anti-Jewish", and "in the North Caucasus" sounds less confusing than "North Caucasian". @Longhornsg, Unknown-Tree, and Osps7: what do you think? Triggerhippie4 (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Antisemitic works for me Longhornsg (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support move to 2023 antisemitic riots in Dagestan or 2023 antisemitic riots at Dagestan airport as a preference. --GnocchiFan (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- @GnocchiFan: It was not only in Dagestan, but in Kabardino-Balkaria and Karachay-Cherkessia too, as the article shows. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- My apologies. 2023 antisemitic riots in the North Caucasus would probably be best in this case. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- @GnocchiFan: It was not only in Dagestan, but in Kabardino-Balkaria and Karachay-Cherkessia too, as the article shows. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support, per User:Unknown-Tree 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 ☎️ 📄
- Support, as wave shouldn't be in the title. Sahaib (talk) 20:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support for substituting "Pogroms" instead of "Riots", because "Pogrom" is more established as a term for a violent riot incited specifically with the aim of massacring or expelling an ethnic or religious group. WanukeX (talk) 23:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support to 2023 Dagestan anti-Semitic riots or something of the like. Jebiguess (talk) 02:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support as suggested. Cherkessk and Nalchik are not in Dagestan, hence it should remain "North Caucasus". My very best wishes (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support nom or Triggerhippie's suggestion. Either way, the current title does not work, IMO. DarkSide830 (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support, but antisemitic is better than anti-Jewish per WP:CONSUB, as the main article is titled antisemitism not anti-Jewishism or anti-Jewish sentiment. —Michael Z. 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, agree. "antisemitic" is much better. My very best wishes (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support Antisemitic and Riots as these clearly are. Borgenland (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Agnostic towards "anti-Jewish" vs "antisemitic", but the vague "wave" should be replaced with the more specific "riots" Bremps... 02:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I prefer a title with "antisemitic" over "anti-Jewish", but both are better than the current title. HappyWith (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 October 2023[edit]
- What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned the protests as "deeply upsetting".
US presidential spokesperson Adrienne Watson condemned the protests.
- Why it should be changed:
Increasing condemnation by world leaders
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1718811576583499953 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-67258332
Declan Newton (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done See diff, which also added the European Commission response. Thank you! GnocchiFan (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)