Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Schwede66 (talk | contribs)
Autopatrolled, Administrators
233,355 edits
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:


::{{not done}} You have only created one article so far. [[User:Widr|Widr]] ([[User talk:Widr|talk]]) 19:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
::{{not done}} You have only created one article so far. [[User:Widr|Widr]] ([[User talk:Widr|talk]]) 19:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

====[[User:Kiwichris]]====
* {{rfplinks|1=Kiwichris}}
:Long-term quality editor, but has been creating new articles regularly for the last year only; new article count stands at 60+ and everything that I've come across was without fail. '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 19:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:25, 17 April 2016

Autopatrolled

(add request • view requests)
Shortcuts
Please read Wikipedia:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants who have created fewer than 25 new articles excluding redirects and disambiguation pages are unlikely to be granted this right. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.


User:Fitindia

Have been working on creating articles on Maharashtra legislators and usually there is a backlog as the subject is about local Indian politicians the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly still has a lot of legislators with red links Fitindia (talk) 10:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jaguar

This is going to take some explaining (sit tight). In May 2012 I had my Autopatrolled revoked through mass creating Chinese townships because a proportion of them had errors in. Since then, all of my requests have been denied because I had not created 50 articles within 365 days. I don't know when the rule got changed, but now I see that you're more likely to gain Autopatrolled if you create 25 articles, which I have done over the past year. In fact, a dozen of them are now GAs and several of them I'm in the middle of fleshing out for the Wales contest. I'm an experienced editor with over 150,000 edits and almost seven years of service. I have absolutely no intention of mass creating articles ever again. I don't even think about that discussion that happened in 2012, and I try my best to erase it from my memory. I still feel like I'm being punished for something that happened four years ago. I've demonstrated that I've created over 25 quality articles in the past year (around 150 post-2012) and nobody has ever had a problem with them since. JAGUAR  13:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think Jaguar has come on a long way since he had the autopatrolled removed. None of us create sub stubs anymore, so can't see that happening again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Widr (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose though, on grounds of not really telling the truth here. Post-2012, we have had another mass-delete of pages you created in January 2013 (articles 86 to 220 of your article creation list), then late in 2013 Qizhou, Hebei was deleted, and in August 2014 you created Bentworth Stream which was deleted after AfD in October 2015. We also have Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2/Editnotice from November 2015. This also means that there aren't "around 150 post 2012" articles by far, non-deleted post 2012 is about 83 articles. Fram (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fram, note that 83 articles is more than enough for Autopatrolled status. Jaguar is controversial enough for this to work. SSTflyer 16:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gihan Jayaweera

I have been working in Wikipedia since 2013 June, and happily I can say that, it is my pleasure to be a Wikipedian since then. I am an active article creator since I've started and mainly focused on Zoology, Botany due to my undergraduate experiences and research assistant experiences in my country Sri Lanka. Besides, I am also working on sports articles, mainly cricket and its players, tournaments, statistics, etc. Most of these biological and cricket articles are based on Sri Lanka, cz it is my country and new reveals should improve in my country. Knowing the correct status within the country is a major thing focused on here and this provide reliable evidences with my naked eye as well. So, as a improved Wikipedia with over 990+ articles created by me, I think I am the best candidate to request autopatrolled rights. Thanks. User talk: Gihan Jayaweera 20:55 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 15:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aaronhng

I have created 29 new articles and made more than 200 edits. I fully understand that this status will not help me to create any articles, I am requesting it in order to reduce the working overload of new page patrollers. Thanks Aaronhng (talk) 09:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Articles are fine and edits seem to be good, so why not? --Ochilov (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Not yet. Majority of your articles have been decorated with various maintenance tags. Please address these issues first. Widr (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edgars2007

1000+ articles. SSTflyer 16:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Laberkiste

I am familiar with WP article creation policies and translate articles from German from time to time, using the translate page tool. Laber□T 18:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You have only created one article so far. Widr (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kiwichris

Long-term quality editor, but has been creating new articles regularly for the last year only; new article count stands at 60+ and everything that I've come across was without fail. Schwede66 19:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3ADiff%2F715748316