Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Imnotacoolguy (talk | contribs)
Imnotacoolguy (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
*****The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? [[User:Imnotacoolguy|Imnotacoolguy]] ([[User talk:Imnotacoolguy|talk]]) 05:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)\
*****The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? [[User:Imnotacoolguy|Imnotacoolguy]] ([[User talk:Imnotacoolguy|talk]]) 05:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)\
******It is a reliable source because it is the LA Times blog. The link works because I viewed it today and added a quote to the article from it. You need to copy and paste the link into Google. It doesn't matter anyway, because that isn't the only link. [[User:Schuym1|<span style="color:#0000f1">Schuy</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">m</span><span style="color:#FFBF00">1</span> <small>]]([[User talk:Schuym1|<font style="color:green">talk</font>]])</small> 12:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
******It is a reliable source because it is the LA Times blog. The link works because I viewed it today and added a quote to the article from it. You need to copy and paste the link into Google. It doesn't matter anyway, because that isn't the only link. [[User:Schuym1|<span style="color:#0000f1">Schuy</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">m</span><span style="color:#FFBF00">1</span> <small>]]([[User talk:Schuym1|<font style="color:green">talk</font>]])</small> 12:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
******* copied and pasted link - 'Not Found The requested URL /webscout/2008/03/sony-debuts-six.html/ was not found on this server.' the other sources you list do not indicate notability.. How do they? ::::
******* copied and pasted link - 'Not Found The requested URL /webscout/2008/03/sony-debuts-six.html/ was not found on this server.' the other sources you list do not indicate notability.. How do they? [[User:Imnotacoolguy|Imnotacoolguy]] ([[User talk:Imnotacoolguy|talk]]) 22:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - sourcing indicates notability. Phrasing is a little off, but requires a bit of a copyedit, not deletion. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 10:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - sourcing indicates notability. Phrasing is a little off, but requires a bit of a copyedit, not deletion. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 10:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:03, 24 October 2008

The Roadents

The Roadents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete Article/Stub reads like an advertisment. As do most of this users Articles... Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: None of my articles are advertisements and it doesn't matter if it's a stub! Schuym1 (talk) 23:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why do you think my articles are advertisements? Most of my articles are about films and books that I haven't seen or read! Schuym1 (talk) 23:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Non-trivial web presence indicates the show's got a following. The stub doesn't read like an advertisement to me, and mild irritation with a fellow editor's writing style - on a stub, no less! - is not a criterion for deletion. Let's not get itchy trigger fingers here. Fumoses (talk) 00:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Not at all an advert. Perfectly acceptable stub and externals show notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I found another source. Schuym1 (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I found another one. Schuym1 (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • And another one. Schuym1 (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • If you want to view the LA Times link, do a google search for it. Schuym1 (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • I added two comments from LA Times and Tilzy TV to the critical acclaim section. Schuym1 (talk) 01:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? Imnotacoolguy (talk) 05:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)\[reply]
            • It is a reliable source because it is the LA Times blog. The link works because I viewed it today and added a quote to the article from it. You need to copy and paste the link into Google. It doesn't matter anyway, because that isn't the only link. Schuym1 (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
              • copied and pasted link - 'Not Found The requested URL /webscout/2008/03/sony-debuts-six.html/ was not found on this server.' the other sources you list do not indicate notability.. How do they? Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - sourcing indicates notability. Phrasing is a little off, but requires a bit of a copyedit, not deletion. WilyD 10:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]