Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reply
→‎Mike de Geer: Closed as speedy keep (XFDcloser)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Mike de Geer]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''speedy keep'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. {{nac}} Nomination withdrawn, all !votes to keep <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> [[User:Polygnotus|Polygnotus]] ([[User talk:Polygnotus|talk]]) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
===[[:Mike de Geer]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Mike de Geer}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike de Geer|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 28#{{anchorencode:Mike de Geer}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1163790007/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Mike de Geer}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike de Geer|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 28#{{anchorencode:Mike de Geer}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1163790007/cur|edits since nomination]])
Line 16: Line 21:


:'''Withdraw''': This nomination was meaningless. The page ''does'' pass [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SPORTCRIT]] and research proves his notability. '''[[User:Duke of New Gwynedd|Duke of New Gwynedd]]''' <small>([[User talk:Duke of New Gwynedd|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Duke of New Gwynedd|contrib.]])</small> 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
:'''Withdraw''': This nomination was meaningless. The page ''does'' pass [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:SPORTCRIT]] and research proves his notability. '''[[User:Duke of New Gwynedd|Duke of New Gwynedd]]''' <small>([[User talk:Duke of New Gwynedd|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Duke of New Gwynedd|contrib.]])</small> 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 19:05, 28 April 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. (non-admin closure) Nomination withdrawn, all !votes to keep (non-admin closure) Polygnotus (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mike de Geer[edit]

Mike de Geer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Dutch professional footballer. Page fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 12:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Unclear why this article was nominated. Neither fails SPORTCRIT or the GNG. The nomination does fail NEXIST and BEFORE. gidonb (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Per @GiantSnowman. Svartner (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw: This nomination was meaningless. The page does pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT and research proves his notability. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 17:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.