Energy Survey of North America

Energy Survey of North America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately this is non-notable redundant cruft. No reliable sources, and much of the content overlaps with Technical Alliance. Johnfos (talk) 00:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. An effort is being made to strip articles from Wikipedia connected to energy economics by mainstream editors and their cohorts. User:Johnfos, is part of that group that wants to delete anything related to that. See this as to Wikistalking people involved in these articles see this on that users behavior. This is malicious editing at its worse. People that have a pov against notable information and are systematically removing that notable information. This is happening also on multiple articles related. This article documents the origin of the study of biophysical economics in North America. It is very important. M. King Hubbert geo scientist was a member of this group along with Thorstein Veblen and many other notables. See this discussion for more details on a group of editors tandem editing articles for mainstream views here and here. skip sievert (talk) 02:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Technical Alliance Yet more multiply redundant trivia. There's nothing in the article to suggest that the survey was published or that it produced any results of interest. After the first sentence, the article is just the same old stuff, with no clear link to the survey it's supposed to be about.JQ (talk) 05:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Wrong. It was published as the Technocracy Study Course. This formed the basis of the concept of energy accounting in biophysical economics. skip sievert (talk) 05:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Technical Alliance or maybe Technocracy Incorporated. Only first three sentences are about the energy survey as such, which is not enough to keep a separate article. Beagel (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Beagel you tandem edit with Johnphos and L.K, and J.Q. those editors are systematically removing references to this notable material for unknown reasons, (pov?), but see the note here on that subject from Economics project page. Accordingly you are a canvassed voice here. See this thread about a possible topic ban for that groups leader.

Skip, I would have to repeat my similar request to remove your personal attack and baseless accusations. I never had have any contact with L.K. or J.Q., and never discussed with Johnfos you or your edits. This is irrelevant, but my last contact with Johnfos was several months ago about creation of the article about the Gujarat solar park. Your accusation about tandem edit is a nonsense and your disruptive editorial behavior does not help to achieve the aim of Wikipedia. As of canvassing, I think that as of a member of the WP:Energy, you should knews that there is an automatic notice on the project website about proposed deletions of articles tagged with the project banner. So, once again, please remove your baseless accusations and personal attack. Beagel (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]