Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
VX (talk | contribs)
Editor Review: Schuym1
Imnotacoolguy (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:


Hello there, Schuym1. I'm [[User:RockManQ|RockManQ]] and I would just like to tell you what a good job you've been doing. Keep up the great work. It's always nice to see a reformed vandal contribute positively to Wikipedia. However, I have a few concerns I'd like to throw out there. The biggest would have to be the use, or lack of, edit summaries. It's always nice to see an edit summery, they give us an indication of what you're thinking. Otherwise I think you're doing great. [[User:RockManQ|RockManQ]] 02:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello there, Schuym1. I'm [[User:RockManQ|RockManQ]] and I would just like to tell you what a good job you've been doing. Keep up the great work. It's always nice to see a reformed vandal contribute positively to Wikipedia. However, I have a few concerns I'd like to throw out there. The biggest would have to be the use, or lack of, edit summaries. It's always nice to see an edit summery, they give us an indication of what you're thinking. Otherwise I think you're doing great. [[User:RockManQ|RockManQ]] 02:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I've read all of your articles. All of them. Most of them read like advertisements and most have questionable notability. The wording in articles is awful, the articles need major rewrites. [[User:Imnotacoolguy|Imnotacoolguy]] ([[User talk:Imnotacoolguy|talk]]) 22:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


''' Comments '''
''' Comments '''

Revision as of 22:08, 24 October 2008

Schuym1

Schuym1 (talk · contribs) I first joined Wikipedia in 2006, and I was vandal. I joined again this summer and I was having lots of trouble. Now, I understand the policies and guidelines and I'm able to create lots of notable articles and be an active participant in AFD. Schuym1 (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Hello there, Schuym1. I'm RockManQ and I would just like to tell you what a good job you've been doing. Keep up the great work. It's always nice to see a reformed vandal contribute positively to Wikipedia. However, I have a few concerns I'd like to throw out there. The biggest would have to be the use, or lack of, edit summaries. It's always nice to see an edit summery, they give us an indication of what you're thinking. Otherwise I think you're doing great. RockManQ 02:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've read all of your articles. All of them. Most of them read like advertisements and most have questionable notability. The wording in articles is awful, the articles need major rewrites. Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I like my contributions to AFD. I am able to help save articles and help get rid of non-notable articles. I have created over 20 articles that are all notable. I stopped Billy & Mandy's Big Boogey Adventure from being a redirect and brought it to Start Class by adding a reception section and bringing relevant things back into the article.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Lots of users has caused me stress, but I have been getting better control of my anger.