Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Schuym1 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Imnotacoolguy (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:
***If you want to view the LA Times link, do a google search for it. [[User:Schuym1|<span style="color:#0000f1">Schuy</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">m</span><span style="color:#FFBF00">1</span> <small>]]([[User talk:Schuym1|<font style="color:green">talk</font>]])</small> 01:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
***If you want to view the LA Times link, do a google search for it. [[User:Schuym1|<span style="color:#0000f1">Schuy</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">m</span><span style="color:#FFBF00">1</span> <small>]]([[User talk:Schuym1|<font style="color:green">talk</font>]])</small> 01:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
****I added two comments from LA Times and Tilzy TV to the critical acclaim section. [[User:Schuym1|<span style="color:#0000f1">Schuy</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">m</span><span style="color:#FFBF00">1</span> <small>]]([[User talk:Schuym1|<font style="color:green">talk</font>]])</small> 01:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
****I added two comments from LA Times and Tilzy TV to the critical acclaim section. [[User:Schuym1|<span style="color:#0000f1">Schuy</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">m</span><span style="color:#FFBF00">1</span> <small>]]([[User talk:Schuym1|<font style="color:green">talk</font>]])</small> 01:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
****The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? ::::

Revision as of 05:52, 24 October 2008

The Roadents

The Roadents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete Article/Stub reads like an advertisment. As do most of this users Articles... Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: None of my articles are advertisements and it doesn't matter if it's a stub! Schuym1 (talk) 23:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why do you think my articles are advertisements? Most of my articles are about films and books that I haven't seen or read! Schuym1 (talk) 23:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Non-trivial web presence indicates the show's got a following. The stub doesn't read like an advertisement to me, and mild irritation with a fellow editor's writing style - on a stub, no less! - is not a criterion for deletion. Let's not get itchy trigger fingers here. Fumoses (talk) 00:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Not at all an advert. Perfectly acceptable stub and externals show notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I found another source. Schuym1 (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I found another one. Schuym1 (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • And another one. Schuym1 (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • If you want to view the LA Times link, do a google search for it. Schuym1 (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • I added two comments from LA Times and Tilzy TV to the critical acclaim section. Schuym1 (talk) 01:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? ::::