Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha

Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A wing of a political party that fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset of a political party is not independently notable and no content to expand. Article had been created updated overtime with the sole purpose to WP:Promote its office bearers. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DBigXrayᗙ 09:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would you like to elaborate on how BJYM fails to qualify for the primary criteria of WP:NORG? --Soman (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Comprehensively passes both the WP:GNG and WP:NORG. 1, 2, 3 , 4, 5, 6 Razer(talk) 17:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Razer2115, Please familiarize yourself with WP:ORGCRIT. The bar at WP:ORGCRIT is significantly higher than WP:GNG. All these 6 sources you have presented are WP:ROUTINE coverage by newspapers with WP:Passing Mention, none of these 6 pass as significant coverage of BJYM, so the WP:ORGCRIT criterion are not fulfilled by any of these links. DBigXrayᗙ 09:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The applicable policies seem to be WP:CLUB and WP:NEXIST. The nominator needs to think twice before accusing an editor in good standing of creating an article with the sole purpose to WP:Promote its office bearers. Dee03 14:10, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dee03 I have struck creator as the recent updates are to be blamed for the PROMO. Can you also include the refs you are considering as WP:SIGCOV? To be precise WP:BRANCH seems applicable here more than WP:CLUB, since BJYM is a sub-organization of BJP. DBigXrayᗙ 16:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:MILL wing of the BJP. It does seem like the article and all it's sub-wings BJYM Mumbai, BJYM Karnataka are WP:SOAP. Though if all included, a standalone article may be created but almost all sources that are presented either give it a passing mention and/or in association with the activities of BJP. Even though there are numerous sources which mention it in some capacity, per WP:ORG, it does not fulfill the significant coverage criteria. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, this is slightly ridiculous. BJYM, which has a degree of autonomy visavi its mother party, is one of the largest political youth organizations in the world. Notability can easily verified. For example, here there claim of 5.5 million members. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjym-to-enrol-1-crore-new-members-before-lok-sabha-polls/articleshow/21085881.cms --Soman (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: Soman (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - examples of independent, third-party coverage where BJYM is the main topic - [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78] --Soman (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Soman, I have looked into your first 5 links and the first 2 are WP:NOTNEWS WP:ROUTINE coverage from newspapers. the criteria at WP:ORGCRIT requires much more than minor mentions or notnews type coverage. If you think that there are sources that pass it, then mention a few good ones below. FYI, Link spamming AfDs is not going to save an article from deletion. DBigXrayᗙ 19:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Why don't you spend a few minutes extra and review the posted links? You seem to have little problem in wasting other peoples' time by posting bad faith AfDs, so you could at least have the decency to review other participants arguments in full. What the posted links show is that there are multiple major news outlets (The Hindu, Times of India, Indian Express, NDTV, among others) that have multiple articles where BJYM is the main article subject. --Soman (talk) 00:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  What you did above is nothing but blatant trolling of this AfD. Posting 75 links and asking others to click all of them is not something one expects from someone with good intentions. I looked at the first 5 and they are shit. Based on scores of deletion notices on your user talk page. is obvious that you have trouble understanding our WP:Notability criterias specially WP:ORGCRIT. If you think there are good sources that pass the criteria, select 5 best and post them below. If they are convincing, I will withdraw the AfD. DBigXrayᗙ 06:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]