2022 Kanpur violence

2022 Kanpur violence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a uselss content fork of 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy. The subject very much an integral part of the latter. The page has been created by extracting a section out of it. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Islam, and India. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Pointless content fork of material that is most relevant within its original context, and too diminutive a content body to merit a split. I was possibly hasty, per Capt J Sparrow - perhaps it's a wait and see... Iskandar323 (talk) 12:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The remarks controversy article itself may be a failing of NEVENT. A comment sparks criticism in the world of politics is not a need for a new article, barring actual incidents or the like, and feels like itself could be part of a larger target by avoiding the excessive coverage of the per-country reactions. --Masem (t) 12:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:RAPID. It is getting significant coverage right now.[1][2] Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that makes any difference. This event is no more recent than the others described in the main article. What is the point of creating a separate page devoid of all the context, and focusing on arrests and "investigations" and such? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete NOTNEWS. CFORK of 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Content fork very little different material that could be added to main page.--Iztwoz (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A valid CFORK that was created after discussion at Talk:Nupur Sharma (politician)#Notability. The incident is attracting significant coverage. LearnIndology (talk) 16:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing that's not already said on 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy. Ira Leviton (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Ira Leviton and Iztwoz, this article is 5 times bigger than what has been said "2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy". You should be calling for deletion for 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy because it has basically nothing that hasn't been already said on Nupur Sharma (politician). 122.170.45.106 (talk) 01:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  In which case it would be better to merge the two pages with Nupur Sharma. Iztwoz (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Nupur Sharma (politician) is an un-elected politician. Spokesperson are not notable. Nupur Sharma bio clearly fails WP:NPOL. Nupur Sharma bio is a clear violation of WP:BLP1EVENT. Nupur Sharma should be merged to the notable Controversy Event article and not the other way round. Venkat TL (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]