Please Sign Your Posts

This user is currently working on WP:WikiProject Ryūkyū.

Template:UserTalkArchiveBox

良正月でーびる。今年ん宜さん御願さびら。_{(Did I write that right?)} Minfremi (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Minfremi: 良い正月でーびる, and you too! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:River Soar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest that you tag your new Japan articles with {{WP Historic sites}}? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 04:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sturmgewehr88, I grok IPA and was able to speak Japanese mukashi-mukashi. I dunno about Okinawan. Point me at the reliable sources, and I'll be happy to help out, できるだけ. ピーマン aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mobile, Alabama. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sturmgewehr88. You have new messages at Talk:Ryukyu Kingdom.
Message added 10:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Oda Mari (talk) 10:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sturmgewehr88..It's true, I'm deeply sorry for not respond inmediately to your comment, but I had to go to the kitchen!, sorry...I made the best effort to fixed from now all the details that you put in your message..again, thanks a lot and sorry for the inconvenients!!! Aldebaran69 (talk) 03:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Israel. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sturmgewehr88. It's nice to find another WWII buff. (My stepfather was a gunner in B25s and B26s.) As you know there has been some brouhaha over your username. I'm curious as to how you got the idea that the Panzer variant of the legendary 88 was called the Sturmgewehr 88. The actual name for the gun is the Kampfwagenkanone 88. Do you think you might be willing to change your name to KwK88? Seems like a win-win: you get the correct name for the gun, and it's not a name that would give people the wrong ideas. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Short Brigade Harvester Boris: See the discussion, as you're somewhat mistaken. I took the generic word "assault rifle" and combined it with 88, and Sturmgewehr is abbreviated as StG, so that's how I condense my username. Besides, it's the 88 that people are so concerned about, so replacing "assault rifle" with "tank cannon" doesn't exactly make everyone happy. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 03:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StG88. You made an edit on Jihadi John and, to me, your name really stood out. In my case, the mismatched combination of a German assault rifle, with a purported connection to Hitler, and numbers that are used to represent Heil Hitler, which now I understand is unintentional in your case, immediately led me to make assumptions about you. I know, that's not your problem, but ultimately it's you that is affected. If I'd seen Kampfwagenkanone88/KwK88, or some historic variant of the 88 AA/tank gun, or SturmgewehrXX/StGXX, where XX is any other number (other than 18! :) ), then I wouldn't have thought twice about it.

I don't know what the naming format over on the German WP is. I imagine that they're pretty touchy about potential Nazi references, as you've seen, but I'd be surprised if they banned names that represent a real thing with 88 or 18 in them, for example ArmaLite AR-18. Bromley86 (talk) 07:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Purple Barnstar
		For handling an aggressive challenge with equanimity and aplomb. You kept your cool, and hung around :-) ScrapIronIV (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ScrapIronIV: Thank you! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 21:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Israel. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Konnichiwa (Hello)! "Mitsudomoe" isn't used for only Ryukyuan. For example, Kobayakawa Clan also uses this crest. The source was "Bungo Takada Shi Shi" (written by Bungotakada city. Sorry it is not now on sale because it's old book...) It is written about History of Kyusyu. Could you read Japanese ? If you can, please read this website.(都甲氏(Tōgō clan)) It explains about Tōgō Clan. The author of this website also made extracts from "Bungo Takada Shi Shi."
Are you active on Japanese Wikipedia? If you so, please visit my user page. (´･ω･ ∩　Goodbye !--正親町三条(talk) 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@正親町三条: こんにちは！ I know Ryukyu isn't the only entity to use 三つ巴, but the website shows correct crest for Tōgō clan. I will readd the correct one to the article! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:People convicted of murder. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Morisco. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

はいさい！

There is an Uchinaaguchi speaking page on Facebook, so I decided, why not advertise the Okinawan Language page along with the sandbox there, and I did. I had specified wikipedians, those who know English, and of course those that have knowledge on Uchinaaguchi. There are over 7300 people on this page so there may be at least one who can help out.

Minfremi (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's great Minfremi! I just looked at it. Hopefully more people will get involved now. Oh and I also sent you an freind request and joined the group. にふぇーでーびる！ ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 21:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive reverts by Sturmgewehr88. Thank you. --Nanshu (talk) 06:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bengali people. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sturmgewehr.

I woke up this morning (Showa Day, but I was working until 11 p.m. last night so I slept in) and looked at the page history on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa and, seeing Catflap's name, checked what he posted and went to AN to ask that the section be closed and him warned (but not blocked).

I go back to the talk page and find that not only his close friend and ally, and possible IBAN-violation proxy, but you as well had already posted in the section. I'll withdraw my request for the discussion to be closed if you think it should stay open, and replace it with a specific request that Catflap's be stricken or collapsed. Otherwise, I'll leave as is.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hijiri88: at this point I don't think it matters either way. That conversation was stopped dead by John Carter (calling it "independent" of the RfC and using it to end the RfC). Had John Carter not done this, I think I might have had a shot at a resonable discussion with Catflap about the state of the lede. But oh well. And I think you may have jumped the gun a little, as he was (from my perspective) just responding to the RfC and not attempting to interact with you. Sure, commenting on that page at all is getting close to the line, but he hasn't crossed it yet. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 03:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...... does he normally monitor RFCs and post in them on occasion? He didn't respond to any other RFCs at the same time. It seems much more likely that he has kept watching either that page in particular, or my edits in general. (Or that he has been engaging the discussion from the start, but I doubt that theory will gain much traction with the wider community...) Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 03:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sturmgewehr88, sorry to bother you with this again, but recent developments have made me worried that if I go to all the trouble of completely rewriting the article and radically increasing its coverage of the stuff Icuc2 said I should, when I try to overlay the draft on the article I will immediately be reverted and forced to discuss each individual point for weeks on end as I have up to this point on the relatively tiny matter of whether "Kokuchukai" and "nationalism" should be mentioned in the lead.

Do you also think I should just give up and make "piecemeal" edits? I took your editing my redraft as a blessing on the project, especially in the light of your previous talk page posts, but was I wrong to read it this way? I have reverted my own removal of the Kokuchukai name-drop in the lead of my redraft in the hopes that there are no other problems. Pending discussion of course: your own comments on this issue were unclear so I don't think there is any "consensus" on whether Kokuchukai should be name-checked in the lead one way or the other.

But...

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, on the subject of your previous RFC, I notice that you noticed that one of the two users on the "nationalism should be in the lead" turned around to our side on that issue, thus essentially ending the discussion and making your original RFC question completely void. When I suggested a new RFC or collapsing the previous discussion and changing the RFC question, I was overruled.[1][2][3][4] But now the same user is saying that the nationalism RFC produced a definite consensus on whether or not the Kokuchukai should be mentioned in the lead, which seems really weird to me.

Any thoughts?

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hijiri88: It's not a bother at all! I think the draft is going great (would be better if other editors pitched in though). If other editors add to the draft and the article gets reverted after the overlay, then whoever reverted it is going against consensus.

As for the RfC, I think it should be closed since it is no longer an issue (I just love how John Carter made such a big deal over it and then turned around and agreed). Everyone finally agreed that nationalism shouldn't be mentioned in the lede, but everyone but you has also agreed (or not opposed) that the Kokuchūkai should be mentioned. Anyway, I'll get more involved with the redraft and we should continue to encourage the others, especially Icuc2, to contribute as well. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 18:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you have to admit that the discussion has been pretty toxic up to this point, preventing any true rational consensus one way or the other. Your statement above is the first time you have said "Kokuchukai belongs in the lead" without also saying "nationalism doesn't and several users who are trying to push it in are behaving tendentiously", and Nishidani's posts were the same. SilkTork initially said that the Kokuchukai has to be in the lead based on how the body was structured at that time: I highly doubt any random user who comes across the redraft once it's completed would come to the same conclusion. And it's very difficult to consider what Icuc2 has said as being in support of discussing the Kokuchukai in the lead or anywhere else.

I'm going to drop it for now (or... I'm going to try to drop it... I don't know if the others will let me, though) and work on finishing the draft, and not touch the Kokuchukai reference in the lead in the draft. Then once the article is better, and once the dust has settled (and hopefully once John Carter is banned from either interacting with me or going anywhere near the Miyazawa Kenji article) we can go back and discuss the Kokuchukai-lead issue again and all be grown-ups about it one way or the other.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Taj Mahal. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i was just going back over the March RFC to verify that I had in fact said what I told Icuc2 I had said about the dragon/poet intro, and I found something hilariously ironic.

On the morning of March 12, 2015, I mentioned a user's name on the talk page of an article that user had never edited nor shown any interest in. Two months later it's still biting me in the ass.

Could this be a candidate for WP:AAAARGH?

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 09:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well that is ironic. Haha peobably wouldn't make it into the village stocks though. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 15:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you were located in southern Mississippi. Do you do photo requests? If so, how far away is South Mississippi Correctional Institution (Leakesville) from Hattiesburg? Are you interested in posting a photo of the main entrance sign/gate? (please do not try to actually enter the property, though!) I took a photo of the main gate to Parchman and I was thinking of something like that. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: well it's a 45 minute drive from Hattiesburg, but I'd be glad to swing by there! Btw, did you just happen to drive past Parchman and snap a picture of it or did you go out of your way to find it? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 13:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks in advance! About Parchman, I was in a car driving by it. Parchman wasn't the main reason for the car's route, but I knew Parchman was going to be along the route. I had my camera ready as the main gate approached. It looks like somebody painted it yellow (previously a lot of the pictures showed the gate as white).

Another thing: I wonder if you or your wife know about the hoshuko (part-time Japanese schools) of Jackson, Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, and Memphis (Japanese in Southaven, et. al. would go to the Memphis school). Here is an Ole Miss page about the Oxford Japanese School. Jackson's is listed by the consulate in Nashville but no independent website seems to exist.

WhisperToMe (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: ah ok I understand. About the hoshuko, no I don't know anything about them. Are you wanting a picture of them as well? I can get one of the hoshuko in Jackson, since I go up there at least once a month, but I probably won't go up to Oxford or Memphis anytime soon (I've only gone through North Mississippi once in my life and it was many years ago). ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 14:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also saw that there's a hoshuko in New Orleans, and I could get a picture the next time I'm down there. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 14:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! I'm not exactly sure which building the Jackson Hoshuko holds its classes in. Its address is c/o Wesley Biblical Seminary. Anyway, if you are interested in taking more photos in the Jackson area, if it's okay I would like to show a list of photo requests. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BTW the New Orleans Hoshuko is held at The Waldorf School of New Orleans. It used to be held at Tulane University. Hoshuko typically rent classroom space from universities/schools/churches since they only operate on weekends, and an office somewhere else houses the school administration. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: not a problem! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 14:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Here is a list of ideas for Southern Mississippi and New Orleans:

Mississippi photo request ideas:

Hattiesburg

*Hattiesburg Public School District headquarters: 301 Mamie Street, Hattiesburg, MS 39401

• Hattiesburg High School: 301 Hutchinson Ave. - Hattiesburg, MS 39401
• If you want to photograph the elementary and middle schools that would be fine too!

Jackson area

• Jackson
  • Mississippi Department of Public Safety - 1900 East Woodrow Wilson Drive Jackson, MS 39216
  • Jackson Public School District headquarters - 662 S. President Street Jackson, MS 39201
  • Mississippi Department of Mental Health - 1101 Robert E. Lee Building 239 N. Lamar Street • Jackson, MS 39201
  • Mississippi Department of Public Safety headquarters - 1900 East Woodrow Wilson Drive Jackson, MS 39216
  • Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce - 121 North Jefferson Street Jackson, MS 39201
  • Mississippi Department of Education 359 North West Street Jackson, MS 39201 (former Central High School)
  • Mississippi Department of Corrections headquarters, 723 N. President Street Jackson, MS 39202 - See Google Street View
  • Mississippi Department of Human Services headquarters, 750 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39202 WhisperToMe (talk) 04:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Pearl
  • Pearl Public School District headquarters, 3375 Highway 80 East, Pearl, MS 39208
  • Pearl High School - 500 Pirate Cove, Pearl, MS 39208
• Rankin County (unincorporated area near Pearl)
  • Central Mississippi Correctional Facility: 3794 Mississippi 468, Pearl, MS 39208
• Hinds County:
  • Oakley Youth Development Center entrance sign, 2375 Oakley Road, Raymond, MS 39154 - See Google map image

Biloxi:

• Mississippi Department of Marine Resources - 1141 Bayview Avenue, Biloxi, MS, USA

Columbia area:

• Columbia Training School entrance, 1730 Highway 44 Columbia, MS

Greene County/Leakesville area:

• South Mississippi Correctional Institution - 22689 Hwy 463 North Leakesville, MS 39451 - See google maps image

Woodville

• Wilkinson County Correctional Center entrance sign (I don't know the visiting address yet!)

Louisiana photo request ideas:

• New Orleans Public Schools offices: 121 North Jefferson Street Jackson, MS 39201 (in Algiers)
• Waldorf School of New Orleans (location of New Orleans Hoshuko)

WhisperToMe (talk) 16:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you go into southern Alabama (Mobile and Atmore areas) I'll be happy to make a list for those too! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: alrighty, well I can upload the Hattiesburg and Columbia pictures tomorrow, and maybe I'll get the Jackson area pictures either this weekend or in about three weeks. New Orleans might be in July (I'll be in Fort Knox for the entire month of June). As for South Alabama, I won't be going through there again until early August. Cheers! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 16:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :D WhisperToMe (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: Just got the Hattiesburg pictures, I'll go through Columbia later today and upload them when I get home. Also, I don't know where any of the middle or elementary schools are around here, so I just got HBHS. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 14:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will get the addresses for Hattiesburg schools from the official website. * Burger Middle School - 174 Wsf Tatum Dr, Hattiesburg, MS 39401

• Harper-Wallin Family Education Center - 516 Forrest Street, across from Hawkins
• Mary Bethune Alternative Center - 610 Dumas Avenue, Hattiesburg, MS 39401
• Woodley Elementary - 2006 O'Ferrall Street - Hattiesburg, MS 39401
• Rowan Elementary School - 500 Martin Luther King Drive - Hattiesburg, MS 39401
• Thames Elementary School - 2900 Jamestown Road - Hattiesburg, MS 39402

* Grace Christian Elementary - 2207 West Seventh St. Hattiesburg, MS 39401

• Hawkins Elementary School - 526 Forrest Street - Hattiesburg, MS 3940
• Lillie Burney Elementary School - 901 Ida Ave. Hattiesburg, MS 39401

WhisperToMe (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if there is already a photo of the Hattiesburg city hall. If not, it is at 200 Forrest St.Hattiesburg, MS 39401

And if you have time for more in Columbia (if you don't have time or want to do these on a different day, it's okay!): * Columbia School District (Mississippi) HQ: 613 Bryan Avenue, Columbia, MS 39429

• Columbia High School (Mississippi): 1009 Broad Street Columbia, MS 39429
• Jefferson Middle School: 611 Owens Street Columbia, MS 39429
• Columbia Elementary School: 401 Mary Street Columbia, MS 39429
• Columbia Primary School: 913 West Avenue Columbia, MS 39429

WhisperToMe (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: sorry for the late response! I took an APFT this morning and felt too tired to drive to Columbia, then passed out and only just woke up, but I got pictures of city hall and all of the schools (except for Thames because of construction). I'll upload them after I post this, and tomorrow I'll get the Columbia pictures and one of Thames! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My contribs at Commons. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Because of this more people will you about what the important institutions in Hattiesburg and other cities! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you already took photos of Hattiesburg libraries. If not... * The Hattiesburg Library - 329 HARDY STREET Hattiesburg Mississippi 39401

• The Petal Library - 714 SOUTH MAIN STREET Petal Mississippi 39465

Also:

In Hattiesburg:

• Presbyterian Christian School Elementary School: 103 WSF Tatum Drive

In Petal:

• Petal city hall: 119 W. Eighth Ave. Petal MS, 39465
• Petal post office: 121 Morris St, Petal, MS
• Petal School District HQ: 617 South Main Street Petal, MS 394965
• Petal High School: 1145 Highway 42 East Petal, MS 39465
• Petal Primary School: 60 Herrington Rd. Petal, MS 39465
• Petal Elementary School: Petal Elementary School 1179 Hwy 42 Petal, MS 39465
• Petal Upper Elementary School: 400 Hillcrest Loop Petal, MS 39465
• Petal Middle School: 203 E Central Ave Petal, Mississippi 39465

WhisperToMe (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: I just realized I might be a little busy today and tomorrow with personal business that needs taking care of (It'll take me all day and I prefer to get daytime pictures). Friday I'll finish off Hattiesburg/Petal/Columbia and Saturday I'll hit Leaksville and maybe Biloxi (you can add Gulfport photo requests too). ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 17:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine! I know it's a large number of requests, so please take your time :) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want more Leakesville pics:

• Greene County School District (Mississippi)
  • District HQ: 528 West Oak Street, Leakesville, MS 39451-2998
  • Alternative learning center: 400 Hardy Avenue Leakesville, MS 39451

** Greene County High School: 4336 High School Road Leakesville, MS 39451-9801

• • Vo-Tech High School: 173 Vo-tech Road Leakesville, MS 39451-9512
  • Leakesville Junior High School: 620 Main Street Leakesville, MS 39451-1479
  • Leakesville Elementary School: 175 Annex Road Leakesville, MS 39451-1299
  • Sand Hill Attendance Center: 39455 Hwy 63 N Richton, MS 39476

** McLain Attendance Center: 300 Shows St/198 Bypass Mclain, MS 39456 WhisperToMe (talk) 21:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: well I went through Columbia and Leaksville today and got most of the pictures. Some of those addresses were wrong though (CSD office was a bench in the middle of a park?), and I honestly could not find the correctional facility. I found a trailer park full of Greene County police cruisers and some "State property: keep out" signs, but there wasn't much else to indicate that it was there. Also, there was a death in my extended family, so I'll be in Florida until next week. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 03:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that it happened. I hope your family will recover. I'll have to double-check the CSD address.

WhisperToMe (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This webpage shows an image of the CSD headquarters and gives the address: "613 Bryan Avenue, Columbia, MS 39429" - I know some addresses may be hard to find or conflict with mapping programs. It's unfortunate.... WhisperToMe (talk) 06:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: yeah, 613 Bryan is in the middle of a park, but on the corner of Bryan and Broad was File:Columbia School District Office Annex.jpg (close enough). Very unfortunate. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 06:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One trick for next time is using alternate mapping software that may pinpoint the location better. Another is to search in Google Maps street view until you see the real building. In the country I'm in right now I can't use Google Maps easily... - Also, do you often visit the place in Florida in happier times? If so I can post requests for that area too. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: Well like with the correctional facility, I used two different mapping softwares (considered going to the courthouse and asking for a real map) to find where it was supposed to be, but I just couldn't find a way in. And no, I only come out to Florida about twice a year at most. What country are you in? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 13:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I'm in Mainland China WhisperToMe (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another good photo op for the Jackson area: Piney Woods Country Life School (Rankin County) WhisperToMe (talk) 22:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

check ur inbox sturmgewehr

Hi Sturmgewehr88, I came across several photos on Wikipedia that you have recently taken in and around Hattiesburg, MS. That led me to your Talk page, where WhisperToMe had made several photo requests. If you are still amenable to photo requests, there are two buildings located at Camp Shelby that are on the National Register of Historic Places, but lack photos. Those structures are items #2 (Building 1071) and #3 (Building 6981) on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Forrest County, Mississippi. Images of those two buildings would complete the current NRHP listings in Forrest County. Thanks for your consideration. Woodlot (talk) 11:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodlot: I'm in Florida for the week, but when I get back I can easily get the pictures. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 13:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Believe it or not, Curtis has actually started an ANI thread asking for me to TBANned for supposedly engaging in "battleground" behaviour. Even though said battleground behaviour consists of pointing out the blatantly obvious fact that he has been misreading/misrepresenting sources, something you yourself have pointed out too. The thread is TLDR but several users who don't like me for other reasons have already voiced their support without actually reading the discussion. Little help convincing the community/admin corps that he is the one who needs a TBAN? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Italic text[reply]

Hey Sturmgewehr, I noticed that your signature is causing a bit of problems with Wikipedia's syntax highlighting, and I would appreciate if you could fix it as a courtesy to myself and others.

Your current signature:

'''[[User:Sturmgewehr88|<span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">ミーラー強斗武</span>]]</span>''' ([[User_talk:Sturmgewehr88|StG88ぬ会話]])

What it creates:

ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話)

Fixed version:

'''[[User:Sturmgewehr88|<span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">ミーラー強斗武</span></span>]]''' ([[User_talk:Sturmgewehr88|StG88ぬ会話]])

What it creates:

ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話)

Thanks, Pishcal — ♣ 02:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pishcal: please see this discussion. Originally, my signature was how you are asking me to change it to, but another user a few months ago asked me to change it because it interfered with some gadget. I'll go ahead and ping @McGeddon:. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I actually believe that we've both suggested the same change, and are referring to the same "gadget", the syntax highlighter. Just to clarify, I am asking to to change your signature to the bottom version. I've reformatted my original post just to make it a bit more clear. As you can see and as McGeddon said previously, they both render the same, but the bottom version doesn't cause problems to the syntax highlighter. Pishcal — ♣ 02:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pishcal: No, you're asking me to change my signature back to how it had been previously. My current signature is how McGeddon asked me to change it to fix the syntax highlighter. I will change it back now because you're asking me to, but I want to hear from McGeddon. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nisour Square massacre. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you recently reverted my edit on an article. The reason for this you claimed was that my edit was unnecessary. However, I utterly fail to understand why my edit would be unnecessary, all my edit consisted of was adding a metric measurement alongside the measurement in feet. The reason behind my edit is that the majority of the World's population are not brought up with feet as a measurement (including myself), therefore it is much harder to visually what six feet actually means. Therefore, I added the measurement in the metric system. I fail to understand why this is supposedly unnecessary. Yes, the metric measurement is mentioned in the fact box, but so is the measurement in feet, would it not then also be unnecessary to have the measurement in feet in the article? I sincerely hope that you do respond since I am genuinely intrigued to your thought process behind this. --Hejligan (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hejligan: The source that stated his height used feet, so that's what I used in the article, and I put meters in the infobox for convenience of metric users, so yes I thought it was unnecessary. But I'm inclined to agree with you now, and I'll readd meters to the article. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 16:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! It is pleasurable that we could reach agreement! --Hejligan (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Slovakia. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Croatia in the union with Hungary. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debate on the monarchy in Canada. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you put Uni-Ufugusuku in a more specific subcat than "15th-century Asian people"? It's the only article sitting in a vague categorization there. --Slivicon (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Slivicon:  Done ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 16:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1982 Lebanon War. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosovo. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 ForbiddenRocky (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 182.249.10.206 (talk) 02:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:India. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Sturmgewehr88, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 23:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you not leave the sockpuppet templates that suggest the user was blocked? That should be up the blocking admin when they really are blocked...

Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 07:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgewilliamherbert: sorry about that, I'm just trying to link these socks to their master account and I assumed they'd been blocked. Is there a better template for this, or should I manually add Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of ShantaePirate? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 14:49, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Who-wass? is the latest sock. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 14:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yep... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseon. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Legobot: you invited me to participate in my own RfC FYI.. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sturmgewehr88. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hello, Sturmgewehr88. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Just so you know, you're assisting in the harassment of Hijiri88 against other editors. He has only placed the tags on the article out of spite to irritate CurtisNaito. Perhaps you are unaware that Hijiri88's actions are being investigated at ANI.  — Calvin999 17:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: how is challenging the reliability of a source (which to me isn't reliable) a form of harrassment? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 17:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because he's cropped up on every article and nomination CurtisNaito works on and nominates since Curtis commented about the course of action that should be applied to him on ANI.  — Calvin999 21:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvin999: and that would be History of Japan and that one other article right? Two articles over the course of several days is still not hounding. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd really rather you do it, and I back you up, since I think another AN thread started by me is a bad idea at this exact moment.

It seems pretty obvious that CN didn't read my comment before making his latest revert. They have thus far completely failed to use the talk page correctly (as with last time CN was told off on ANEW) and are therefore the only party who have been engaged in "edit-warring". BRD and BURDEN are both on our side as well.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hijiri88: I won't be able to do it until this evening, but at this point something needs to be done. You should also stop reverting him so it's not as bad when the finger-pointing starts (and it will). TH1980 is a different story, I'd rather leave him be for now. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 13:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree with you. I don't think blocks are warranted anyway -- I think what we should request is that an admin revert to the consensus version generally agreed to by you, me, Nishidani, Vivexdino and Phoenix7777 and protect the page for a coupla days.

Although if Rjensen responds to the message I left him the way I think he might, then it will no longer be five users independently opposing the reinsertion of those citations against two users who think they belong and two users who think any position I hold must be wrong, but five or six users independently opposing the reinsertion of those citations against one user who thinks they belong and two users who think any position I hold must be wrong.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although Calvin999 has been here far too long and made far too many good edits to actually be a "true believer" in the cause of forcing me off Wikipedia -- he could probably be won over with the proper well-reasoned, policy-based arguments. I just don't think I'm the one to do it. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 13:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, regarding the massive problems already demonstrated on the "good article" History of Japan -- would you mind helping me draft a GA reassessment proposal here? As you know, I have a habit of being kind of long-winded, and not very objective. In talk page discussions I can't reasonably ask you to write my posts for me, but I can ask for assistance drafting a proposal. As you are also aware, the article contains massive sourcing problems, with unreliable sources cited, and words put in the mouths of reliable sources -- I checked some of the areas I know more about than the Wikipedian who rewrote the article, and found about a 75% OR/misleading rate; but I don't know everything -- if you could check some of the other passages for problems and succinctly describe them in the draft, it would help. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hijiri88: which sections have you already checked? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 15:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sentences discussed in the draft, and the ones I edited since... Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 21:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Considering how much I've been trying to keep him from retiring, you shouldn't be surprised to have seen it coming. Luckily, one thing I pointed out to him, in e-mail, was that we have a lot of material which is still used in academic reference encyclopedias from older PD German-language encyclopedias, and a lot of it could be very beneficially used if it were translated. I am still, unfortunately, working on the list of works by number of times referred to from the Encyclopedia of Religion, but I hope to have it finished and added to the talk page of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Library page by the end of the week, with any luck. John Carter (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@John Carter: I think you're mistaken; I predicted he would come back out of "retirement", again, which he basically just did. If anything, he's just taking a wikibreak. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been in contact with him for some time, I don't think you have. I actually try to keep in regular e-mail for a while with a lot of editors who are considering leaving, as part of the efforts of WikiProject Editor Retention. And, actually, he had indicated earlier that he would be amenable to doing some translations from German-language sources like the RGG for articles we don't have here yet and maybe adding them to German wikisource first, perhaps translating to English wikisource second, and then, maybe, using that as a basis for an English article here. Not everyone place first priority on editing their user page first, and, apparently, he may not have forgotten the edit, or had it slip his mind, earlier. John Carter (talk) 23:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@John Carter: No, not since he stated he no longer wants to interact with me however-many months ago. And good for him and the project if he decides to do that. On another note, you study religion right? Which religions specifically? ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 01:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not so much any religion specifically. My own field, I guess, is primarily reference works. I live in St. Louis, which has a huge number of seminaries and divinities schools in the area, and also the St. Louis University divinity library, counted as being one of the best in the world in the broad field of religion as a whole. Washington University's library isn't so much a divinity library, but it isn't bad either. But the religious content has been for some time among the most contentious, and having reference works available tends to make resolving some of the arguments, particularly regarding those relating to weight, a bit easier. And, between all of them, I think I have access to pretty much every recent reference work in the field, somewhere in town anyway. I know Catholicism best, being one, but most of the content on that topic specifically is already fairly good. John Carter (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sefa-utaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryukyuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of Japan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does "No one has yet found any actual problems with the sourcing used in the article" seem like it "violates WP:IDHT"? Because that's how it looks to me. I don't think Dennis Brown would take to kindly to me reporting this violation to him directly, though. Thankfully, you already said you were on the lookout for this -- wanna field this one? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 18:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]