Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Ricky81682 (talk | contribs)
→‎November 2008: last warning
Raven in Orbit (talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 164: Line 164:


: Ok, you deserve more than this. I want you to strike out your comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ephebophilia&diff=prev&oldid=254656283 here]. Do '''NOT''' call anyone a "pedo POV-pusher" again or you will be blocked indefinitely. And your "LOL!" edit summary just makes it more clear. That kind of behavior is not appropriate at all. If you want, there is a discussion about your conduct at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attack_by_Raven_in_Orbit.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_.28Pedophilia-related_accusation.29|WP:ANI]]. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 02:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
: Ok, you deserve more than this. I want you to strike out your comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ephebophilia&diff=prev&oldid=254656283 here]. Do '''NOT''' call anyone a "pedo POV-pusher" again or you will be blocked indefinitely. And your "LOL!" edit summary just makes it more clear. That kind of behavior is not appropriate at all. If you want, there is a discussion about your conduct at [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attack_by_Raven_in_Orbit.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_.28Pedophilia-related_accusation.29|WP:ANI]]. -- [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 02:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

:: I did consider removing that comment for a while just to conclude it had already been removed. Concerning the comment itself: I'd absolutely agree it is to "[[Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|disrupt Wikipedia to make a point]]" but I can't agree it is a personal attack. I was making fun of Flyer22s style of contribution on that talk pages but the comment was not addressing Flyer22 personally. Furthermore, the Ephebophilia article itself is saying most people call it paedophilia and then you want to see me blocked for calling those who insist the article should say "it's perfectly normal, we all do it" pedo POV-pushers.

:: To give you a simple example:
:: In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ephebophilia&diff=221280458&oldid=221272608 a comment] Flyer22 suggest [[Mark Foley]] should have been called an ephebophile (not a paedophile)-- failing to explain why his "normal behaviour" resulted in a [[Mark Foley scandal|scandal]]. Flyer22 insist I can't distinguish between someone 7 and 17 just to proceed to discuss why kids "who already has breasts and menstrual cycles" are legitimate objects.
:: I certainly don't want to be associated with anything vaguely related to all this. If you have to block me for calling these people pedo POV-pusher -- please go ahead.
:: / [[User:Raven in Orbit|Raven in Orbit]] ([[User talk:Raven in Orbit|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Raven_in_Orbit|contribs]]) 21:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:56, 3 December 2008

Welcome to my talk page. New entries at bottom.

/ Raven

Archives
Archive 1, December 2006 - June 2007; Archive 2, July 2007 - June 2008; Archive 3

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 25 23 June 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Board elections completed; results forthcoming WikiWorld: "John Hodgman" 
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones Dispatches: How Wikipedia's 1.0 assessment scale has evolved 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 26 26 June 2008 About the Signpost

Ting Chen wins 2008 Board Election ArbCom's BLP "special enforcement" remedy proves controversial 
Global group discussions in progress WikiWorld: "Raining animals" 
News and notes: Foundation hires, milestones Dispatches: Reliable sources in content review processes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
News and notes: The Price is Right, milestones Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens: Over $500,000 raised in first week ArbCom elections: Nominations open 
Book review: How Wikipedia Works MediaWiki search engine improved 
Four Board resolutions, including financials, approved News and notes: Vietnamese Wiki Day 
Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost

Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license 
Wikimedia Events Roundup News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Regarding your comments on Talk:Ephebophilia: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. neuro(talk) 23:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you deserve more than this. I want you to strike out your comment here. Do NOT call anyone a "pedo POV-pusher" again or you will be blocked indefinitely. And your "LOL!" edit summary just makes it more clear. That kind of behavior is not appropriate at all. If you want, there is a discussion about your conduct at WP:ANI. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did consider removing that comment for a while just to conclude it had already been removed. Concerning the comment itself: I'd absolutely agree it is to "disrupt Wikipedia to make a point" but I can't agree it is a personal attack. I was making fun of Flyer22s style of contribution on that talk pages but the comment was not addressing Flyer22 personally. Furthermore, the Ephebophilia article itself is saying most people call it paedophilia and then you want to see me blocked for calling those who insist the article should say "it's perfectly normal, we all do it" pedo POV-pushers.
To give you a simple example:
In a comment Flyer22 suggest Mark Foley should have been called an ephebophile (not a paedophile)-- failing to explain why his "normal behaviour" resulted in a scandal. Flyer22 insist I can't distinguish between someone 7 and 17 just to proceed to discuss why kids "who already has breasts and menstrual cycles" are legitimate objects.
I certainly don't want to be associated with anything vaguely related to all this. If you have to block me for calling these people pedo POV-pusher -- please go ahead.
/ Raven in Orbit (Talk | contribs) 21:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]