Hi N1TH Music! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mjroots (talk) 07:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mulinetti, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Victor Schmidt (talk) 11:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mulinetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mulinetti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As written, this draft does not satisfy geographic notability.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has been reference-bombed with low-quality search results.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mulinetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mulinetti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mulinetti railway station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia).

Wikipedia may not be used as a reference. See the policy against circular references. References to Wikipedia may and should be converted to in-line links. Although links do not take the place of references, which are required, links will facilitate the evaluation of this draft by providing context.

This draft should be revised and resubmitted with valid references and without using Wikipedia as a reference. You may ask for advice about references and/or links at the Teahouse.

The draft also has tone issues. The last sentence has a breezy informal tone that is not encyclopedic.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nozarego".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bricherhaff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kréintgeshaff, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kréintgeshaff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mulinetti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mulinetti railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Leslie Railway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Unless there are references showing how this was independently notable, it would be best to include information at Edinburgh and Northern Railway (where it is already talked about).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leslie Railway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leslie Railway, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very short, unsourced. Please continue.Xx236 (talk) 08:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bricherhaff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Additionally, Google Maps is not a meaningful source, and vdl.lu contains no useful information to verify the article contents.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Welcome Beach, British Columbia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leslie Railway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leslie Railway, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Railscot is a reliable source, more that half of all railway based articles on this site cute railscot N1TH Music (talk) 10:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, English Corner Nova Scotia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:09, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bricherhaff, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on N1TH, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Slenderman7676. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 442, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Slender (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please avoid using Google search results as a reference, as that is not a WP:RELIABLE source. It may be used to find sources as per WP:GOOGLE, but is not a source in itself in that context. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

N1TH Music, I just noticed that Kj cheetham had called your attention to using Google search results as references. Thanks for all you do but be more specific. I have removed your reference in Railway Driving Motor Car with hopes that you will consider what we are trying to say. Danidamiobi (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article London Underground Driving Motor 3706 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Not everything that's kept in a museum is by default notable, it needs independent reliable sourcing to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article London Underground Driving Motor 3701 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article London Underground Driving Motor 3690 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article British Rail Locomotive 02 004 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article British rail Locomotive 02 001 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article British Rail Locomotive 02 003 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article London Underground Driving Motor 3370 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (talk) 10:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Underground Driving Motor 3209, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Island Line. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Underground Driving Motor 3701 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Underground Driving Motor 3701 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Note this nomnination also covers:

• London Underground Driving Motor 3209
• London Underground Driving Motor 3690
• London Underground Driving Motor 3706
• London Underground Driving Motor 3370

Thryduulf (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British rail Locomotive 02 001 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British rail Locomotive 02 001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Black Kite (talk) 11:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:British Rail Locomotive 02 003, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thryduulf (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Put simply, this is an encyclopedia, not a repository for every last piece of information about individual items of rolling stock, no matter how insignificant. The key thing to bear in mind is that the subject has to be notable, not just another item in a long list of identical (for all practical purposes) items. Your point about 08s is very relevant, who wants 850 separate articles all saying more or less the same thing? The same thing applies to the class 02s, if on a smaller scale. There were ony a few of them, they did nothing special in their careers, all of which can be summed up in one article. The 37s and 47s (and some other classes) warrant a bit more information because the various sub-classes were created to fulfill different roles. Hence my two lists to help clarify the situation. The 02s were shunters and remained shunters.

There are enthusiast pages on the web that carry the sort of detailed information that an enthusiast like yourself might want to know, see for Class 66 for instance. There may be one for class 02s, and other classes that you are interested in, that would welcome the in-depth information you have. --Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please do not use Flickr for references (let alone over 40 times in a single article, as you did at British Rail Class 02). Per WP:USERGENERATED, sources such as Flickr are not acceptable for Wikipedia. In general, the level of detail you are adding to locomotive articles is excessive for Wikipedia's standards as well. As others have mentioned, such contributions would be welcome on fansites, but not here. Before creating more articles, I strongly recommend that you review Wikipedia's policies on notability and reliable sources. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loch Urigull is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loch Urigull until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Allnabad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a farmstead, not a village or similar place, fails WP:NGEO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Railway Driving Motor Car has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirely unsourced, failing WP:V and some outright wrong statements as detailed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_Railways#Other_articles_by_N1TH_Music. Could potentially be made into something, but looks more like a candidate for TNT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ceathramh Garbh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Something that is 58m higher than its surroundings is not a mountain, by definition. If not deleted, should be redirected to its parent Arkle (Sutherland).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (talk) 23:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trainsandotherthings (talk • contribs) 01:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• To avoid any ambiguity from that {{ANI-notice}} I would like to confirm the discussion thread is here. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kréintgeshaff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO: it's a farm, nothing more.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your post at ANI. It is always better to engage when issues are raised at ANI rather than to stay silent. As I said there, were were all new once and we've all made mistakes.

Moving forward, I've added a Welcome notice to the top of your talk page. Please take the time to read the pages linked from it, as it will be of benefit. WP:RS is also worth a read. As you now seem to appreciate, Flickr should only ever be used as a source of photographs that are suitably licenced for use on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the majority of them aren't.

As you are interested in railways and also the Sutherland area, what do you think about writing an article on the Wester pipe railway. There is an article on de-Wiki, and the sources used are in English. Reply here as I'm going to temporarily watchlist this page. Mjroots (talk) 07:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've just curated both Loch Merkland and Loch Urigill and saw your messages on the talk pages. Don't worry, both are suitably sourced with a couple of solid references so it would be very doubtful that there would be any reason to delete them. Best Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:English Corner Nova Scotia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "English Corner Nova Scotia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi N1TH Music! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at British Rail Class 02 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leslie Railway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, N1TH Music. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Railway Driving Motor Car, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JohnFromPinckney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Contern, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I appreciate your additions and improvements, but the article was already tagged as needing further citations; there's no good reason to make the situation worse. Can you provide some reliable sources for your material and readd it? Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 10:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Brichermillen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this to drafts, because I'm not entirely convinced that the subject is notable even per WP:GEOLAND, and in any case the sources cited are less than WP:RS; please provide better sources and/or otherwise establish notability, and then put this through the AfC pre-publication review process. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brichermillen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for you're new articles for places in England. If you're interested I have a project at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes which lists missing parishes in England that need articles. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You moved Carignano to Carignano, Piedmont already a week ago, but Carignano, Liguria is not ready yet. Can you please answer in Talk:Carignano, Piedmont. Thanks, bye. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 19:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Comunal Documents of Santa Margherita Ligure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Comunal Documents of Santa Margherita Ligure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 09:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Santa Margherita Ligure has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You have included straight translations from the (copyrighted) municipality website and presumably other sources as well. Translation of a copyrighted text is just as much a copyright violation as posting the original text. Fram (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Urm if one section is copyrighted why would you delete everything including what isn't copyrighted. How do I get any of my work which I wrote myself back? N1TH Music (talk) 18:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I wrote for Geography, Tourism, Settlements, History, staffing (of municipality) had absoluely not copy and paste why did you eliminate everything, you could have just deleted everything that cited the comune. I had no idea that the trnaslations were still copyrighted. I spent weeks working on that did you have to literally DELETE every revision N1TH Music (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Santa Margherita Ligure has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. "no directly translated material"? You have sections which start with "View from the Seafront of Santa Margherita Castle " without an image in sight, and with text which is a direct translation of https://www.beniculturalionline.it/location-3306_Castello-di-Santa-Margherita-Ligure.php. The other sections seem to have the same problems. Again, please stop. Fram (talk) 12:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram What Copyright? All the information is either from the Italian Wikipedia (which last time I checked is the same website and therefore isn't copyright to translate) or from openstreet map or other small sources and is paraphrased. There's no copyrighted material there. N1TH Music (talk) 13:45, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Help:Translation. You may not simply translate other Wikipedia articles without providing proper attribution. You also shouldn't post machine translations but should check your translations carefully, which you clearly didn't. Each article you translate (even partially) needs individual attribution (not just a general "taken from itwiki" or some such). Fram (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram I don't know what this https://www.beniculturalionline.it/location-3306_Castello-di-Santa-Margherita-Ligure.php is. "View from the Seafront of Santa Margherita Castle "I wrote that myself or if not I got it from Italian Wikipedia and they stright copied it, I've never been to that sight and so not have any intentions to copy other material. I'm sorry for last time but I genuinely thought it was a loophole to translate material to avoid copyright and now I know better. But wouldn't it be better to only delete the one supposedly copied line rather than to remove all my work, no? N1TH Music (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram What are you talking about? The only translations are from the Italian Wikipedia which is not copyright because Italian Wikipedia is still Wikipedia, correct me if I'm wrong. N1TH Music (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which post are you replying to? Again, please see Help:Translation. Fram (talk) 14:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was no reply button to your message for some reason at the time so I replied to myself and then tagged you. I'll check Help:Tranlsation and then I'll try to readd my changed to Santa Margherita Ligure without copyrighting anyone. If you could maybe please tell me one more time exaclty which parts are in violation of copyright law? N1TH Music (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram I replied already but forgot to @ you please read the message N1TH Music (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"If you could maybe please tell me one more time exaclty which parts are in violation of copyright law?" As far as I can tell, all of it. Unattributed translations of Italian Wikipedia articles are violations of our copyright policies. Fram (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram Really? because many pages say that information can be taken from a corresponding article in another langauge. But anyway the link you gave me said that raw machine translations are not very good so if I edit everything it's ok, right? I didn't accidentally or unknowingly copy from an external site? N1TH Music (talk) 14:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"But wouldn't it be better to only delete the one supposedly copied line rather than to remove all my work, no?" Uh, nearly all you wrote was a translation from Italian, not just that one line. No idea where you got that idea. Fram (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kackerterhaff, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Loch Urigull requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FramI don’t understand why shouldn’t this redirect exist? N1TH Music (talk) 12:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

N1TH Music, the message from Fram is a notice that the page has been tagged, it is not the start of a discussion. If you disagree with the tagging, you need to follow the directions given above, beginning If you think this page should not be deleted. Posting here will not alter the outcome. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did that, I posted information on the talk page of Loch Urigull but I still wanted to clarify something. N1TH Music (talk) 04:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abellio, Ellesmere Port is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abellio, Ellesmere Port until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Conton and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 23#Conton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 08:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bocce (Locality) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 23#Bocce (Locality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 08:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Border of Santa Margherita Ligure and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 24#Border of Santa Margherita Ligure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Trudlerbrook requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Street Design of Santa Margherita and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 24#Street Design of Santa Margherita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blackslough Wood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackslough Wood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion about your edits, including a proposal to block you, is started at WP:ANI#WP:CIR block needed. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]