Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Highpeaks35 (talk | contribs)
→‎3RR: reply
Highpeaks35 (talk | contribs)
→‎3RR: reply
Line 24: Line 24:
:{{user|Highpeaks35}} What is this? ''You'' have made 3 reverts, not I. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 02:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
:{{user|Highpeaks35}} What is this? ''You'' have made 3 reverts, not I. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 02:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
:: {{user|Fowler&fowler}} No, my reverts were after the talk page. It was agreed some info can stay, while others needed consensus. That is what we are working on in the talk-page. ([[User:Highpeaks35|Highpeaks35]] ([[User talk:Highpeaks35|talk]]) 02:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC))
:: {{user|Fowler&fowler}} No, my reverts were after the talk page. It was agreed some info can stay, while others needed consensus. That is what we are working on in the talk-page. ([[User:Highpeaks35|Highpeaks35]] ([[User talk:Highpeaks35|talk]]) 02:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC))
:::{{user|Fowler&fowler}} Wait... Above you stated: "I will no longer be working on India-related topics." Change of heart? Missing edit-warring on India related topics with you Eurocentric view? ([[User:Highpeaks35|Highpeaks35]] ([[User talk:Highpeaks35|talk]]) 02:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC))

Revision as of 02:25, 2 January 2019

3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 02:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Highpeaks35 (talk · contribs) What is this? You have made 3 reverts, not I. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fowler&fowler (talk · contribs) No, my reverts were after the talk page. It was agreed some info can stay, while others needed consensus. That is what we are working on in the talk-page. (Highpeaks35 (talk) 02:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]
Fowler&fowler (talk · contribs) Wait... Above you stated: "I will no longer be working on India-related topics." Change of heart? Missing edit-warring on India related topics with you Eurocentric view? (Highpeaks35 (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]