Hello Dudhhr. I am just letting you know that I deleted Geo Varghese Peter, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which didn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dudhhr, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of CES Records, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I received your message regarding an edit to centering prayer. As an expert in this area, and to maintain neutrality on the topic, it is significantly more neutral to state "claims to be" (my edit) rather than a definitive statement as "is" as was previously on page. Due to the increasing amount of articles, studies, and information out and continuing to be released showing that it is not what it claims to be. Therefore, "claims to be" is the most neutral statement. Thanks! Curdie of the Cross (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curdie of the Cross: The use of "claims to be" should be avoided per MOS:CLAIM. Information regarding criticism of the method is provided in the relevant section of the article. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Thank you for explaining. This certainly makes it far more difficult to provide true neutrality. 162.213.240.179 (talk) 17:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article was very helpful. Thank you! 162.213.240.179 (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:McAleer § McAleer - Cenel Moain. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:22, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...this,[1] thanks for your advice. I'm trying to avoid any controversy. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:34, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I notified everyone who had significantly contributed to the discussion (excluding Valjean because he was alerted to GENSEX several months ago). I couldn't tell if you had been alerted before as the edit filter log for your talk page only contains entries from its current incarnation (because you archive it by moving the entire page instead of by moving the individual discussions). – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 21:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I had not gotten that alert before about Mattea Roach. The previous discussion, a year or so ago, was merely about whether to include her opinions of the hosts. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to your talk page (in that I couldn't tell if you had been previously alerted to WP:GENSEX), not Roach's. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 01:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understood that. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]