Old discussions now at /Archive 1 / /Archive 2 / /Archive 3 / /Archive 4 / /Archive 5 / /Archive 6 / /Archive 7 / /Archive 8 / /Archive 9 / /Archive 10 / /Archive 11 / /Archive 12 / /Archive 13 / /Archive 14 / /Archive 15 / /Archive 16 / /Archive 17 / /Archive 18 / /Archive 19 / /Archive 20 / /Archive 21 / /Archive 22 / /Archive 23 / /Archive 24

Please add new comments below.

==ChrisO if fucken idiot and international criminal==

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Dear Wiki usser do not contact this idiot and motherfucker. He is fucken homo and you can see more about ChrisO at www.ChrisO.homo.com

Hiya, if it's helpful, you can automate your archive listing with this syntax: {{archives|auto=short}} (or if you like the longer format, just use {{archives}}). That'll automatically keep track of your archives for you, and you won't have to keep adding links to new pages. If you'd like, I could also setup a bot for you, which would autoarchive old threads. Up to you though!  :) --Elonka 17:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You recently left a suggestion on my talk page[1] that I report some Israel / Palestine edit warring, BLP concerns, etc. concerning Historicist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), to WP:AE. I was reluctant because that could be seen as a process fork of an active WP:AN/I report, but no action was taken there so after announcing my intentions, and after the edit war/incivility problem persisted[2] I did file an AE report. Phil Knight opined that the arbitration decision does not apply to BLP articles. Do you think that is the case? If so are there any other things for me to do? Go to 2RR and beyond on the latest BLP vios? File a new arbcom case or ask for Arbcom enforcement / clarification on RFA? I'm kind of stuck right now and I don't want to let editors turn biographies into partisan screeds just because other editors are more tendentious in adding the material than I am in removing it. Wikidemon (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand you had a problem with User:Brewcrewer statements on my userpage series of personal attacks against other editors and a call to treat Wikipedia as a battlefield. I wasn't familiar with the rules and didn't object/defend his statements at the time, but as a result I've found something you might be interested in: Spotfixer, another by Eleland Jewish and obsessively Zionist admin baited me until he ran out of his 3 reverts on User:Eleland's Talk page.

This is all according to Wikipedia is not a battlefield, which you introduced to me at my arbitration.

Sorting through Eleland's talk page will bring up more discussions similar to the ones posted above. After comparing it to Brew, I thought you might be intrigued as it surpasses any negative/personal attack interpreted there in my opinion.

Let me know what you think!

Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rammstein_inferno.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've lost track of how to get onto the Admin IRC channel, could you email me about it? You can just reply to my email I sent you which I don't think you've read yet. Thanks. dougweller (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sceptre ^(talk) 04:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chris! I noticed that you reverted my last edit on Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa (the removal of the infobox). While I believe the section being summarized to be too small to warrant summary by an infobox, I'll concede to your wishes and leave it to be decided by others. I did remove the casualty and injury numbers from the infobox as was discussed in the discussion page. If you'd like to discuss the change, please do so there.

I'm relatively new to Wiki and fully accept the fact that I will make mistakes and be wrong but discussion is the only way I'll learn. If you'd lke to talk more, we can do it here, my talk page, or preferably the Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa discussion page.

Thanks for your time. OlYeller^Talktome 08:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a Request for Arbitration regarding the use of northern/southern West Bank vs. Judea and Samaria. Since you have been involved in this debate, I have included you in the request.

Cheers, pedrito - talk - 25.02.2009 09:33

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tznkai (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris,

In the upcoming J+S ArbCom case, I'm worried Elonka's limited topic ban will be used again to cast undue doubt on my conduct. Since 1) Elonka confirmed it was based on a misunderstanding on her part and 2) she promised to lift or at least reduce it after one week, then forgot about it and went on a Wikibreak, and 3) the stated infraction was first changed, then never specified beyond a vague "based on the recent pattern of reverts, and working your way through several Israel-Palestine articles and making Samaria-related reverts", and 4) the only two Samaria-related reverts I had made in the preceding week [3] were in order to fix problems with claims that were either unsourced [4] or sourced exclusively with highly partisan refs [5], I wonder if and where I can appeal to have the ban lifted? MeteorMaker (talk) 08:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update: PhilKnight informed me about the proper procedure and the whole affair is now a thing of the past [6]. Will now focus on the ArbCom case. MeteorMaker (talk) 11:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed that he was the first person to bring Indian hemp to England. Would you be so kind as to provide a reliable source for that please. 72.255.26.202 (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - you are absolutely right. I've been seeing so much crap today that I've become lazy in reviewing edits. I'm drinking more coffee to compensate. -- Scjessey (talk) 00:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - coffee should help. I've semi-protected the article for a few days while the fallout from the WND article settles - hopefully that will make your life a bit easier. :-) -- ChrisO (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't want you to be confused as to why that yellow bar has appeared, so I'm just leaving this to tell you I reverted some talk-page vandalism here (check the history if you're interested). BalkanFever 09:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you had noticed Amerana (talk · contribs) but a CU has turned up the fact that Amerana was a sockpuppet of Ariobarza. I don't know if anything should be done about subpages of both users, what do you think? dougweller (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

My suggestion was made to insure neutrality. without going through the hisory of all the incidents I made a suggestion. I am in no way saying that you should incur administrative actions, if you were not involved in editing the article, but to insure neutrality on both sides of the issue, I think it better if at least by consensus, both editors are prevented from editing the topic. I will specify this on the noticeboard. Thoughts? Sephiroth storm (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm writing a bachelor's thesis about the 2006 Lebanon War, and I would love to include the map you made[7] as an appendix. Unfortunately, my school has a pretty big bias against Wikipedia, so I can't cite it in its current form. I was wondering if you run another another website that I might be able to cite instead? Or even better, if you would be willing to email it to me as an attachment, then I could simply cite it as a 'personal communication.' Or if you have any other ideas, that would be great. Thanks for your time, Maethordaer (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]