Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Artistboynyc (talk | contribs)
Line 40: Line 40:


I appreciate the work you're doing on the SCA article. You may not know that it was once deleted, because the information contained in the article was not supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and it contained a lot of [[WP:OR|original research]], and didn't maintain a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. It was one of many twelve-step articles I re-wrote so it wouldn't get axed again. If you can provide citations for the information you added, and and re-write it to keep and encyclopedic tone, then I won't revert the changes. -- [[User:Craigtalbert|Craigtalbert]] ([[User talk:Craigtalbert|talk]]) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate the work you're doing on the SCA article. You may not know that it was once deleted, because the information contained in the article was not supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and it contained a lot of [[WP:OR|original research]], and didn't maintain a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. It was one of many twelve-step articles I re-wrote so it wouldn't get axed again. If you can provide citations for the information you added, and and re-write it to keep and encyclopedic tone, then I won't revert the changes. -- [[User:Craigtalbert|Craigtalbert]] ([[User talk:Craigtalbert|talk]]) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


There is no original research now sited. Thank you for your interest in SCA but our membership is now contributing to this article and we do not need your help. A warning has been left on your talk page, and will be escalated as necessary. We appreciate all the hard work at deleting you have done. Appropriate citations to the SCA website have been added, and our general membership has been alerted to the obnoxious deletions that have been occuring.

Thank you

Revision as of 20:56, 19 November 2007

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made inappropriate edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Craigtalbert (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sexual Compulsives Anonymous, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. -- Craigtalbert (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't start an edit war

I appreciate the work you're doing on the SCA article. You may not know that it was once deleted, because the information contained in the article was not supported by reliable sources and it contained a lot of original research, and didn't maintain a neutral point of view. It was one of many twelve-step articles I re-wrote so it wouldn't get axed again. If you can provide citations for the information you added, and and re-write it to keep and encyclopedic tone, then I won't revert the changes. -- Craigtalbert (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


There is no original research now sited. Thank you for your interest in SCA but our membership is now contributing to this article and we do not need your help. A warning has been left on your talk page, and will be escalated as necessary. We appreciate all the hard work at deleting you have done. Appropriate citations to the SCA website have been added, and our general membership has been alerted to the obnoxious deletions that have been occuring.

Thank you