Artistboynyc (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I appreciate the work you're doing on the SCA article. You may not know that it was once deleted, because the information contained in the article was not supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and it contained a lot of [[WP:OR|original research]], and didn't maintain a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. It was one of many twelve-step articles I re-wrote so it wouldn't get axed again. If you can provide citations for the information you added, and and re-write it to keep and encyclopedic tone, then I won't revert the changes. -- [[User:Craigtalbert|Craigtalbert]] ([[User talk:Craigtalbert|talk]]) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC) |
I appreciate the work you're doing on the SCA article. You may not know that it was once deleted, because the information contained in the article was not supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and it contained a lot of [[WP:OR|original research]], and didn't maintain a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. It was one of many twelve-step articles I re-wrote so it wouldn't get axed again. If you can provide citations for the information you added, and and re-write it to keep and encyclopedic tone, then I won't revert the changes. -- [[User:Craigtalbert|Craigtalbert]] ([[User talk:Craigtalbert|talk]]) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
There is no original research now sited. Thank you for your interest in SCA but our membership is now contributing to this article and we do not need your help. A warning has been left on your talk page, and will be escalated as necessary. We appreciate all the hard work at deleting you have done. Appropriate citations to the SCA website have been added, and our general membership has been alerted to the obnoxious deletions that have been occuring. |
|||
Thank you |
Revision as of 20:56, 19 November 2007
Welcome
November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sexual Compulsives Anonymous, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. -- Craigtalbert (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Please don't start an edit war
I appreciate the work you're doing on the SCA article. You may not know that it was once deleted, because the information contained in the article was not supported by reliable sources and it contained a lot of original research, and didn't maintain a neutral point of view. It was one of many twelve-step articles I re-wrote so it wouldn't get axed again. If you can provide citations for the information you added, and and re-write it to keep and encyclopedic tone, then I won't revert the changes. -- Craigtalbert (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
There is no original research now sited. Thank you for your interest in SCA but our membership is now contributing to this article and we do not need your help. A warning has been left on your talk page, and will be escalated as necessary. We appreciate all the hard work at deleting you have done. Appropriate citations to the SCA website have been added, and our general membership has been alerted to the obnoxious deletions that have been occuring.
Thank you