Hello, And heg, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --PBS (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry old boy, but I exist. We all have to start somewhere, but this is a real bother. And heg (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Damwiki1 into which you can place a comment to explain the coincidence. --PBS (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Damwiki1/Archive it was never the intention of anyone to intimidate anyone else. You happened, through no fault of your own to get embroiled in a dispute between two editors. One of the thinks which we try to keep a lid on are edit wars, as they wast a lot of time and are stressful for the people involved. To keep a lid on these types of disputes we have a policy see WP:3RR). See User talk:Kurfürst#One day bock for breaching 3RR.

As I blocked user:Kurfürst under that policy and warned user:Damwiki1 under the same policy, when you made the same reversal as user:Damwiki1, I was duty bound to follow it up, as not to do so could have been seen by user:Kurfürst, not unreasonably, as showing favoritism.

However we have a behavioral guideline on Wikipedia called "assume good faith" so as the outcome of the sock puppet investigation was that you could be a friend, and that as a new editor you might well not have been aware of the rules, -- or it could be a coincidence and you are from the same city and share a specific interest but do not know each other -- and those are the inferences that all editors of good faith will draw. So as far as I am concerned the incident is closed, and I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia.

A word of warning though, if you are a friend of Damwiki1 (I am not asking if your are and I don't want you to tell me if you are), do not get drawn into disputes on pages that (s)he edits where you could be seen as either a meat puppet, or working as a tag team, as these too are a breach of Wikipia rules. --PBS (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]