SEMI-RETIRED

Your autoblock should be cleared now. Edit the sandbox or something to be sure. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Maunus is only human)) sometimes mistakes happen lol. Alexandre8 (talk) 00:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops again. I guess I am All too human!·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alexandre8. You have new messages at Steven J. Anderson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Steven J. Anderson (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've given up trying to formulate a good article from that one, as those editing it seem to have an agenda against the article subject. Seems a game of fitting in as much "right-wing extremism", "xenophobia" and "racism" remarks as possible, rather than writing a NPOV article. Sad really. You and I both said a passing reference (from a source who has a political bias) wouldn't do, but the agenda-squad don't seem interested in quality sourcing, only enforcing their BBC, career politican created narrow view of the subject.

What you've put on the talk page of the article is spot on! If you already have a hatred of something, then how can your work possibly be neutral, let alone used a source on a site which is meant to be neutral?!?!?!?! Having been through the "reknowned" British education system, an "educator" becomes respected by the establishment for simply having pro-establishment, often socialist leanings. If you hold such views, you'll become "respected"! I do love the "racist" remarks though. Guess that's why the nephew of the former Prime Minister of Guyana has recently joined the party. I guess when people fear a movement, they lie about it and try to paint it in bad light. Regards. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't envy your task in trying to get that article at least semi-decent! Seems unfortunately agenda led editors will constantly bombard that page with their person misconceptions. Best of luck anyway! Regards. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well just stick to the rules and the article will be good as new again. Don't fear a bit of heavy editing, it occurs. Alexandre8 (talk) 17:43, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-islamic is sourced in the main body of the article. Its not normal to put sources in the lede. You might want to self-revert --Snowded ^TALK 00:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My computer is playing up massively, I just was just writing a longish piece and it just crashed. My ability to get this done quickly is now jepordised, will get a technician to have a look at it over Christmas. Every time I open up a few pages or more for quoting it just freezes. Will try my best for the moment with just opening two at a time. If you could removed the offending material yourself I'd be much appreciated. Thanks Alexandre8 (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have just had a look and can't find the sources in the main body. Could you show me please. thanks. Alexandre8 (talk) 02:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For striving to create and maintain a politically neutral Wikipedia. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! My first barnstar :)! See with Ukip, a little perseverance goes a long way. Alexandre8 (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I don't know who it is. I always log in if I want to edit articles. If you presume that someone uses sockpuppets, why don't you initiate a sockpuppet inquiry? As Xijky is banned, it is not completely unlikely that this user continues editing anonymously. Regards --RJFF (talk) 11:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]