Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Notice: Incorrect use of minor edits check box on Perth.
Tag: Twinkle
→‎Rottnest: new section
Line 30: Line 30:


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi Simulaun! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at [[:Perth]] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia{{Snd}} it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as [[typographical error|typo corrections]] or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see [[Help:Minor edit]] for more information. ''Most of your edits are tagged as minor but are not minor.'' <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi Simulaun! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at [[:Perth]] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia{{Snd}} it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as [[typographical error|typo corrections]] or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see [[Help:Minor edit]] for more information. ''Most of your edits are tagged as minor but are not minor.'' <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

== Rottnest ==

Hey, it is great that you are keen on Rottnest history, but the content you've been adding about Terra Nullius go against Wikipedia policy of no original research as none of those sources make any claim about Rottnest being 'bona fide Terra Nullius'. The source provided that claims it was 'officially discovered' by Vlamingh is just a blurb about a pamphlet and is really insufficient for making the claim that a place that had already been inhabited, as well as visited by other explorers. I'd suggest using the Rottnest talk page if you want to make the case for either of those matters further, rather than making the same edits repeatedly.[[User:The Logical Positivist|The Logical Positivist]] ([[User talk:The Logical Positivist|talk]]) 07:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:24, 24 April 2022

Welcome

Here are some lamingtons to welcome you to WikiProject Australia!

G'day Simulaun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Article titles
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 11:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding interpretation of WP:STATUSQUO, which version should be maintained while the Etymology section is being discussed. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Perth".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Mitch Ames (talk) 05:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Information icon Hi Simulaun! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Perth that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Most of your edits are tagged as minor but are not minor. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rottnest

Hey, it is great that you are keen on Rottnest history, but the content you've been adding about Terra Nullius go against Wikipedia policy of no original research as none of those sources make any claim about Rottnest being 'bona fide Terra Nullius'. The source provided that claims it was 'officially discovered' by Vlamingh is just a blurb about a pamphlet and is really insufficient for making the claim that a place that had already been inhabited, as well as visited by other explorers. I'd suggest using the Rottnest talk page if you want to make the case for either of those matters further, rather than making the same edits repeatedly.The Logical Positivist (talk) 07:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]