Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SEAL Team Six, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - wolf 09:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Special Operations Command (Philippines). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.
Note: The content you added is still there as of the posting of this notice. But you should be aware that it can be challenged or removed at anytime, by any user, as unsourced material. You should research this content and add reliable sources to support it as soon as you can. FYI. (and don't forget to add edit summaries to all your edits) - wolf 09:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at SEAL Team Six. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. - wolf 20:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]