Note to self - action. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

[title width guide]

Just an FYI since you were involved before: [1] -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Oregon Entrepreneurs Network has been removed. It was removed by Ryanjlewis with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Ryanjlewis before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Sorry to have forced you to start your weekend with a moan, and thanks for adding the redirect.

Rsloch (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Luftwaffe bomber crash near Kingsdown, Kent in November 1940 has been removed. It was removed by Kbaughan1 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Kbaughan1 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Since you expressed an opinion in the last AfD regarding UK service areas at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donington Park services, I'd like to inform you of a new AfD discussion which has recently been started by another user at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norton Canes services (2nd nomination). In the interests of keeping this within the rules regarding canvassing, I am sending this to everyone involved with that original debate, regardless of if they voted keep or delete, or if they appear to be active or inactive. Jeni ^(talk) 14:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from Mehernosh shroff, by User:NawabMohammedsultan, with summary '(Mehernosh Shroff is a Pioneer creator and inventor , ship builder , port and terminal managment , Towages)'
• PROD removed from Wade R. Meisberger, by User:Jclemens, with summary '(Decline prod. [{WP:SOFIXIT]], Google News archive shows plenty of hits for this person, indicating he meets the GNG)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Hi I noticed that Agenor Muniz is now a redirect to Agenor Muñiz. Would you be able to restore the content of Agenor Muniz in some form, perhaps as Agenor Muniz (Australian footballer) if appropriate? Thanks The Hack 02:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

• Very sorry about merging two different people. I don't think any admin action is required. You have recovered the text about the Australian and created a new article. I would suggest: move Agenor Muñiz to Agenor Muñiz (Uruguayan footballer) and convert Agenor Muñiz into a disambig page. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 04:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC

Thank you for your message. I am not sure I understand how to fix your comment. Could you explain. Apologize for being a newbie. I am trying to understand. Thank you for your patience. Beach4444 (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks for cleaning up references. Was trying to figure out how you did it in "edit this page", but doesn't show up yet.. I did add "categories"" to the bottom of article. Will try to clean up external links. Thanks. Beach4444 (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I added to the html site "http://sites.google.com/site/narimanbmehta/"... It now shows the link "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence" in the article.. Beach4444 (talk) 04:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• But you dropped "Text is available under the" - why? But don't worry - it is not important! — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 21:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

You recently blocked SxyKing (talk · contribs) as a new sockpuppet of Kkandler (talk · contribs), based on the obvious behavioural evidence. Based on the same behavioural evidence, I think it is obvious that Siciliangambit (talk · contribs) is another sockpuppet. If you agree and block, I think most of that user's edits need to be cleaned up as well (which I can help with, since it looks like just content removal, not article deletion). Thanks! Singularity42 (talk) 20:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• If there was any doubt about sockpuppetry, this clumsy edit would confirm it! However re these edits to pilot licensing and certification: obviously the spammy link/s must be deleted (I will let you) but the text itself seems perfectly acceptable. Kyle does seem to have worked out that he can write about the license but not about the course his company offers. So I am reluctant to block him. But I shall warn. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 20:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. Singularity42 (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: deleting a list of "notable scholars" and their bios in the International Political Economy entry.

20:19, 8 September 2009 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted "David E. Spiro" ‎ (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

Jeff Hart, who is head of the International Political Economy section of the International Studies Association contacted selected scholars and asked them to add their names to the entry "International Political Economy" on wikipedia. I added my name at his request, and wrote a brief professional biography to link to the entry. Both were tagged and I've since removed both. I understand why it is important to highlight self-referential entries. And I've recommended to Prof. Hart that he make the changes in wikipedia himself. The net result of all this is that while the rule on self-reference is understandable, in this case it has not helped the community of International Political Economy scholars build a meaningful wikipedia entry. The entries were not "vanity entries". It is a list of people who've changed the way other scholars think about their field of study. Retrieved from User talk:DavidESpiro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidESpiro (talk • contribs) 00:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

• Jeff Hart should be severely reprimanded for encouraging people to write about themselves on Wikipedia. It is even dubious whether he should be adding bios. You should wait until editors with absolutely no COI decide you guys are notable. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 00:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I haven't a clue. I didn't even realize it was becoming an issue. If I see any other examples I'll let you know. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from Association montessori international / usa, by User:Sarah communications, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Jay Foreman (comedian), by User:Jbf500, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Saakshar Bharat, by User:122.167.79.253, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Bibliofilm, by User:Jclemens, with summary '(PROD challenged after deletion)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from FlowMon, by User:Ondra.lengal, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Organic Junk Fude, by User:76.89.120.17, with summary '(no edit summary)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

My page also includes white hole info which is not apart of your page therefor it does not need to be added to your page. The redirection is to allow someone to go to someone's page which I have at the bottom of my page. Lokiwintergersky (talk) 06:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I say my and your to keep the parties at dispute separated. Lokiwintergersky (talk) 06:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I have replied on Loki's talk page. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I've re-opened Template talk:Oscoor#External link failed because it's not been working these last two or three days --Redrose64 (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

• 18:16, 9 March 2008 RHaworth protected Self-replicating machine ‎ (rpeated trolling by blocked user [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

That was over 18 months ago. I'd like to review this to see if semiprotection is still necessary. See talk:Self-replicating machine. --TS 11:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 12:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Muhammad Yaseen nawaz, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Muhammad Yaseen nawaz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Muhammad Yaseen nawaz during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Dynaflow babble 13:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

• Done. If you spot any more: a) a quick Google check will probably enable you to mark them copyvio and b) just tell me and I will deal. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 14:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

It took me a second to realize why TW thought to send you the automatic original-contributor warning for the MfD nom. In any case, I'm glad the deletion discussion proved productive, though the incident has done little for my confidence in the products of Lahore University's MBA program. =)

My first thought upon seeing the original incarnation of this nonsense (I think it first appeared at User talk:Muhammad yaseen jutt (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)) was that it must be a copyvio. However, I could not get any Google hits out of a random sampling of sentences I submitted, aside from a couple of items which seemed to originate in corporate annual reports and which appeared to have been intended not necessarily as properly-formatted and cited quotes, but, from the context, were included at least in the "spirit" of quotes. My operating assumption has been that the material either originated with the posters themselves or was lifted from a source of such fathomless obscurity that Google hasn't seen fit to index it. --Dynaflow babble 20:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from BrainWare Safari, by User:Brjwiki, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Dance Marathon at Hope College, by User:198.110.111.216, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Learning Enhancement Corporation, by User:Brjwiki, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Motor-CAD, by User:Dougieh, with summary '(Have added more details and references to subject.)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Would you consider redirecting this article to Hope College right now?

The article is obviously not notable in its current form, so this material can be removed right now, with only a redirect remaining.

I could redirect the page right now for you and close the Afd, instead of having to wait 7 days.

Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can redirect the article and close the AFD.Ikip (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Also Motor-CAD >> Brushless DC electric motor thanks. Ikip (talk) 01:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Dance Marathon. I consider that the subject warrants a mention in the Hope College article and is not worthy of a redirect. But I want to see what other people think. I am surprised that people have not rushed up to express their opinions right now.

Motor-CAD. A very firm no to a redirect. Motor-CAD is for designing any type of elecric motor (in fact it probably does not do BLDCs). The BLDC article does not discuss design tools. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 08:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

thank you for considering this proposal. :) I am rather suprised about how these articles are not getting !votes either.

This is a recent trend which has been discussed on WT:AFD. Ikip (talk) 21:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from Ergotopography, by User:Ben MacDui, with summary '(Prod declined. Very borderline - will drop author a note)'
• PROD removed from H.E. Waheed Waheedullah, by User:Shannon.barnes, with summary '(no edit summary)'
• PROD removed from Harold HyunSuk Oh, by User:Shannon.barnes, with summary '(Removed challenge after adding links and references to justify Dr Oh and the World Water Organization's notability.)'
• PROD removed from Standard argument against free will, by User:Cmsreview, with summary '(Removed marked for deletion as essay, after removing the essay material)'
• PROD removed from The World Water Organization, by User:Shannon.barnes, with summary '(Removed challenge after adding links and references to justify the organization and its board members' notability.)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Georgia Right to Life has been removed. It was removed by Mission:Life with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Mission:Life before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

• PROD removed from Coproduction of public services by service users and communities, by User:Tony Bovaird, with summary '(Removed some of the references)'
• PROD removed from Janet K. Brennan, by User:Jbstillwater, with summary '(no edit summary)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ballaghaderreen Cathedral 5385.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I started a wiki page for Wrapid, unfortunately I didn't get chance to finish the page and obviously it's been deleted. I would like to go and finish the page off, any chance you can make the page unprotected so I can do this?

Thanks Scottward86 (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

• Let us see your draft in User:Scottward86/sandbox including some evidence of notability. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 23:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Would you kindly archive my Talk Page? I never learned how to do it. Also, other pages have been archived - so if you just follow the previous format, that would be fine. On the other hand, I noticed someone having "automatic" archiving. Is there such a thing? If so, that would be my preference - i wouldn't need to bother you. Thanks either way. Hope all is well with you. --Ludvikus (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I tried doing it myself - but I messed up. And I don't know how to un-do the mess. Can you help me, please. --Ludvikus (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Did you wonder what this edit was all about? Just wait. If the MiszaBot has not done its job in the next 24 hours, then you may come back to me. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 10:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I have no idea what you're talking about. But you solved my Archiving mess - thanks a lot. (Now I'll try to figure out what you're talking about!) --Ludvikus (talk) 10:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I am trying hard not to be sarcastic but … Do you know how to read a diff listing? This link returns hundreds of kilobytes but the only bit that matters is near the top with a green background. You do not need to understand it but you should see the words "[ro]bot" and "archive" (three times!). You mentioned automatic archiving - did you not think that this might be the setting up of automatic archiving. See this which states that the bot runs once a day at a preset hour. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 10:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Got you. And I'll try to remember to look for sarcasm in your future remarks. Thanks. I've often failed to laugh at humor when told in a dead-pan manner. But writing on Wikipedia did not prepare me for humor - I guess because perhaps more than 90% of the time is spent trying to get another to understand one point. I'm surprised you are able to be sarcastic on Wikipedia - or perhaps you presumed something (positive I hope) about my intelligence, and from there you graced me with sarcasm - no doubt a benefit an idiot would be spared. Regarding "Bot" & "Robot" I got that - but I admit not having spent sufficient time learning Wikipedia jargon and procedures as would benefit me and Wikipedia. But now I'[m worried I may have forgotten some stuff due to my "vacation" (hope you get my sarcasm here). On that point, I'd like to say your one person I have a good memory of - though one might not deduce that from the photo you've posted on your User page. Anyway, the best to you. --Ludvikus (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Nice photo of her grave. I've added it to the BOAC Flight 712 article. (Found it when I visited newbie Kbaughan1's talk page to ask some questions about the Luftwaffe bomber article that had been deleted. I think he'll make a good editor once he learns a bit more about how Wikipedia works. Mjroots (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to FNPower100 has been removed. It was removed by FNMarketing with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with FNMarketing before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

I hope this is the right way to discuss this with you! I am the user that created the Occam Process page and wanted to inform you that I replied to your note, and started to see why it looked like an advert after all. I started a discussion on the talk page and also removed one of the External Links.

Hope to either improve the article or get you to move me to your way of thinking haha. Thanks for prompting this, I was impressed to see how quickly a new page received action on Wikipedia! Hope to talk to you soon. Mech sj (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

just a note--you seem to sometimes be neglecting to notify the authors. e.g. Zehava Gal, Mezzo-Soprano, Avioportolano. DGG ( talk ) 17:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)