Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Nemo bis (talk | contribs)
→‎Bot approval: Add another summary as people keep asking
→‎Bot approval: the word "identifier" doesn't even appear on the bot 5 RfAppr page: the examples given were either corrections of otherwise malformed template data, or suboptimal changes (e.g. forgetting to link the free copy of the article via url); gave the nine official function overviews for the completed approval procedures instead
Line 104: Line 104:


== Bot approval ==
== Bot approval ==
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DOI bot]]
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DOI bot]]: Adds DOIs to citations provided using {{tl|cite journal}}
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DOI bot 2]]
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DOI bot 2]]: Add missing parameters to citations from CrossRef database, and tidy citations
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DOI bot 3]]
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DOI bot 3]]: Replace hyphens with en-dashes in page number ranges
** This request was denied with rationale: "If there is consensus for changing it your bot is already approved to do so"
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 4]]: Use uniform citation template families for uniform formatting.
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 5]]
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 4]]: Where pages use a mixture of 'citation' and 'cite journal' templates (which produce different output styles), use the dominant template in all cases
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 6]]
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 5]]: Change 'Cite ArXiV' to 'Cite Journal' where appropriate
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 7]]
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 6]]: Add names to anonymous reference tags
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 7]]: Facilitate the addition of references by adding ref tags where requested.
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 8]]: Conversion of URL citations, including work on [[Wikipedia:Bare URLs|bare URLs]], duplicate URLs for [[Help:Citation_Style_1#Online_sources|online sources]] and [[Help:Citation_Style_1#Identifiers|identifiers]] (like [[special:diff/424898867|JSTOR]], [[special:diff/424896886|bibcode]] and [[special:diff/424759921|ASIN]]).
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 9]]: Null editing
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 8]]: Convert bare URLs to "Cite Journal" or "Citation" templates
* [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Citation bot 9]]: Perform null edits to update category membership


== External links ==
== External links ==

Revision as of 12:23, 19 September 2020

Activate Guide Bugs/Features Emergency shutoff
Activate the bot on a specific page or all articles in a category. How do you get the best results? Want an activation link on every page you edit? Consult the guide! Something wrong? Report it!
Have an idea? Suggest it!
Source code available at GitHub.
Admins: Follow instructions.
Non-admins: Report to WP:ANI.

Function summary

This bot was originally designed to add digital object identifiers (DOIs) to references; it now does much more, adding other identifiers (PMIDs, ISBNs), links to open access repositories, and fixing common formatting errors.

The bot obtains citation data from a range of sources including Google Books, Google Books API Family, CrossRef, AdsAbs, arXiv, oaDOI and PubMed. Because scraping data from web pages is unreliable and resource-intensive, these databases are the main source of data; unfortunately the bot is unable to tell when these databases contain errors or incomplete information. Any such error or omission should be reported directly to the data repository maintainer.

Data sources

Open source links are from mostly oaDOI.

Development

A stable version of the bot is always available at https://citations.toolforge.org/

Time commitments preclude regular updates; maintenance is attempted every few months. The source code can be found at https://github.com/ms609/citation-bot.

Interpreting bot edit summaries

The bot edit summaries try to strike a balance between providing too little information to be useful and so much information as to exceed the line limits and to just duplicate the edit content itself. Sometimes the edit summary will include items that did occur in the final edit because multiple actions cancelled each other out. Also, if a URL is removed, then the edit summary might say that other things (such as access-date) were removed because there was no URL, even though there was originally a URL: this is because the bot works in phases.

Stopping the bot from editing

  • To prevent Citation bot from editing a page entirely, add the following text anywhere on the page
    {{bots|deny=Citation bot}}
  • To prevent Citation bot from editing a specific citation, add a comment to the citation template before the first |, such as
    {{cite journal <!-- Citation bot bypass--> |last=Smith |first=John |year=2018 |...}}
  • If the bot is erroneously adding or modifying a parameter (e.g. adding a wrong |last=/|first=, or a wrong |doi=) to a citation), put a comment in place of the appropriate parameter such as
    |doi = <!-- Citation bot adds wrong DOI-->

Although the content of the comment is not relevant to the Citation Bot, it is best to include some text within the comment so that human editors understand why there is a comment. Also, it makes it clear why, such if the comment was "Citation bot grabs invalid issue number from pubmed", then a human might know that they too should not believe pubmed. Lastly, random empty comments are prone to being deleted by human editors as "extraneous".

It may be possible to fix the underlying problem if you report the error – but there are a few, rare instances (such as false positives and editor preference) where it is impossible to implement an automatic fix.

False positives

If the bot is adding seemingly-unrelated data to a citation, it is probably receiving a false positive from the citation databases it consults. Unfortunately, there's no way for the bot to know this, so there are two ways of avoiding it:

  • Change the citation template to one which the bot doesn't modify, such as cite news, etc;
  • Add a comment into one or more of the parameters – these comments will not be over-ridden by the bot, and will reduce the chance of the citation databases throwing false positives.
  • If the journal title has non-standard casing (Such as PLOS One), then special code should be requested on the bug report page, or better yet, make a pull request on https://github.com/ms609/citation-bot/blob/master/constants.php

Page numbers with hyphens

The bot replaces hyphens with en dash in page number ranges. On rare occasions when a hyphen is right and an en dash is wrong (hyphen in the page number itself, often because the page number includes the chapter too), manually use the {{hyphen}} template instead of the dash/hyphen character. An alternative is to use the template's |at= parameter.

Valid parameters

The bot draws all parameters specified in Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist with the format "['parameter_name'] = true", and treats these as valid spellings. The bot maintains its own copy at https://github.com/ms609/citation-bot/blob/master/constants/parameters.php

Internationalization

There have been a number of requests for the bot to be adapted to foreign-language wikipedias. When time permits, I will be happy to work towards this. For me to adapt the bot for a foreign wiki I first need:

  • A valid bot account on that wiki with the appropriate permission for its edits
  • A translation of each of the template names and parameters used.

If you have both of these available, please let me know and I will set to work on the necessary coding.

Function

Automatic or manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): PHP

Function summary: Maintains and expands citations; ensures standards are complied to.

Edit period(s) Can run in a continuous mode that automatically revisits articles, but currently used on specific articles whenever requested by a user.

Function details:

  1. Replaces "id=identifier" or "url=http://resource.org/identifier=# with "identifier=#"
  2. Fixes common typos in parameter names (not values), using the closest match if the typo is not in a list of frequent mistakes https://github.com/ms609/citation-bot/blob/master/constants/parameters.php
  3. Removes redundant parameters
  4. Searches for missing parameters (including URL), then adds them if available. This is especially convenient when only an identifier is included within the template
    • The bot uses a range of databases including Google Books API, Google Books, PubMed, CrossRef, AdsAbs, doi.org, and JSTOR
  5. Converts an endnote citation to a Wikipedia citation — Example
  6. Is authorized to, but not currently add names to references and combine duplicates
  7. Expands {{cite arXiv}} templates with an eprint parameter, and updates them to use {{cite journal}} where appropriate
  8. Where a mixture of {{citation}} and {{cite xxx}} family templates are used in an article, is authorized to standardize to the dominant format, but does not currently do that
  9. Convert bare references to citation template based references

User box you can add to show support

Wikitext userbox where used
{{User wikipedia/Citation bot}}
This user fixes citations with the help of Citation bot.
linked pages

Bot approval

External links

Bot Recognitions

The Original Barnstar
Thank you, you have been very helpful to me as a new user and contributor. Tonythetiger89 (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

This kitten is  Fixed

Vivian

Kashment (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 05:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

The Citation Barnstar
For all of your citation fixes! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
Amazing,

Im out of words! It's Indeed very helpful Dadhush (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

The Editor's Barnstar
Good job. Keep it up man !!! Taal Saptak (talk) 10:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
That's really great Jackwilliam2 (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The Technical Barnstar
Thank you for your dedication that eases my workload! It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


The Original Barnstar
Thank you Ackee123 (talk) 11:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


Good job! Azilmark89 (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar
Hey, I was just there suffering in cite date. Any way thanks CBOT. F5pillar (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)