Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Swedishbrittisk (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Swedishbrittisk (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 17: Line 17:
:::The only ono who is reverted by other users is you. And as I checked your profile history, it is definitely not the first time as I saw you were even blocked for days. Your edits makes no sense. I asked you multiple times to explain some edits you did, but you never answered, only said that my behaviour is disrupting. What you did with Ora's discography is a MESS and as the user Helptottt said...you don't own the page, so please think about your behaviour because you are acting like a child with no reasonable arguments and explanation. [[User:Jakubik.v|Jakubik.v]] ([[User talk:Jakubik.v|talk]]) 14:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
:::The only ono who is reverted by other users is you. And as I checked your profile history, it is definitely not the first time as I saw you were even blocked for days. Your edits makes no sense. I asked you multiple times to explain some edits you did, but you never answered, only said that my behaviour is disrupting. What you did with Ora's discography is a MESS and as the user Helptottt said...you don't own the page, so please think about your behaviour because you are acting like a child with no reasonable arguments and explanation. [[User:Jakubik.v|Jakubik.v]] ([[User talk:Jakubik.v|talk]]) 14:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
::::What????. The article is well written, it complies with the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|manual of style]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style|discography]] guidelines, it is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and contains reliable sources, so what "makes no sense"? Argue with Wikipedia's guidelines, I'm here to improve articles and not waste my time with absurdity. [[User:Iaof2017|Iaof2017]] ([[User talk:Iaof2017|talk]]) 12:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
::::What????. The article is well written, it complies with the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|manual of style]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style|discography]] guidelines, it is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and contains reliable sources, so what "makes no sense"? Argue with Wikipedia's guidelines, I'm here to improve articles and not waste my time with absurdity. [[User:Iaof2017|Iaof2017]] ([[User talk:Iaof2017|talk]]) 12:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::Hey, I’ve been off Wikipedia for some time for personal reasons, but I still know the rules and guidelines perfectly. What [[user:Iaof2017|Iaof2017]] is doing is against Wikipedia rules, so, guys, keep reverting if this user keeps on doing these senseless edits, this isn’t a war of who is the best, so stop acting like a little kid, if not, go to the park, but not disrupt Wikipedia pages, because you are going to undermine the seriousness of it as a reliable source of information. So, please, we all ask you to stop doing these edits, it’s for the best. Thank you. [[User:Swedishbrittisk|Swedishbrittisk]] ([[User talk:Swedishbrittisk|talk]]) 14:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::Hey, I’ve been off Wikipedia for some time for personal reasons, but I still know the rules and guidelines perfectly. What [[user:Iaof2017|Iaof2017]] is doing is against Wikipedia rules, so, guys, keep reverting if this user keeps on doing these senseless edits, this isn’t a war about who is the best, so stop acting like a little kid, if not, go to the park, but not disrupt Wikipedia pages, because you are going to undermine the seriousness of it as a reliable source of information. So, please, we all ask you to stop doing these edits, it’s for the best. Thank you. [[User:Swedishbrittisk|Swedishbrittisk]] ([[User talk:Swedishbrittisk|talk]]) 14:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:43, 26 October 2022

Disruptive editing of basically the entire article

The user laof2017 has altered the entire article and added so many unnecessary changes. The lead section is filled with superfluous and badly written information. Inexplicably, the user split the singles section into decades, removed charts and unnecessarily added new (less relevant) ones. At one point, the user even included "other charted songs" into the singles section.

It almost feels like this user's edits are done in bad faith because, as another editor wrote, the edits are senseless. It feels like this article is being held hostage. Helptottt (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are constantly being reverted not only by me but also by other users for your disruptions. I would recommend you to do your research and become familiar with Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies or take part on the featured list review. Add your concerns there and contribute to the article instead of unnecessarily disrupting it. Iaof2017 (talk) 18:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please point out where I'm being "constantly" reverted by other editors on this article? I was reverted on another article and the issue was solved. Your edits have been reverted by three editors on this article. The only editor who's engaging in disruption is yourself. So, your only motive in editing these Rita Ora articles is to get a "featured article" for yourself? This is appalling. Helptottt (talk) 23:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The only ono who is reverted by other users is you. And as I checked your profile history, it is definitely not the first time as I saw you were even blocked for days. Your edits makes no sense. I asked you multiple times to explain some edits you did, but you never answered, only said that my behaviour is disrupting. What you did with Ora's discography is a MESS and as the user Helptottt said...you don't own the page, so please think about your behaviour because you are acting like a child with no reasonable arguments and explanation. Jakubik.v (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What????. The article is well written, it complies with the manual of style and discography guidelines, it is verifiable and contains reliable sources, so what "makes no sense"? Argue with Wikipedia's guidelines, I'm here to improve articles and not waste my time with absurdity. Iaof2017 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I’ve been off Wikipedia for some time for personal reasons, but I still know the rules and guidelines perfectly. What Iaof2017 is doing is against Wikipedia rules, so, guys, keep reverting if this user keeps on doing these senseless edits, this isn’t a war about who is the best, so stop acting like a little kid, if not, go to the park, but not disrupt Wikipedia pages, because you are going to undermine the seriousness of it as a reliable source of information. So, please, we all ask you to stop doing these edits, it’s for the best. Thank you. Swedishbrittisk (talk) 14:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]