Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
→‎May 2019 edits: new section
Line 34: Line 34:
Can we stop with this nonsense please? Putting up with it is quite tiresome.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 03:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Can we stop with this nonsense please? Putting up with it is quite tiresome.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 03:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
: Regular appearences actually, not one. Please show why Gontarczyk's radio interview is DUE, given Gontarczyk's record in these matters and coverage of Gontarczyk - who works in the archive of the much maligned IPN - {{tq|"After 2015 the IPN converted into an institution promoting revisionism in reference to Polish-Jewish relations. Previously open attitudes to research and teaching about the Holocaust were amended.}}[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17504902.2019.1567668 Ambrosewicz-Jacobs, Jolanta. "The uses and the abuses of education about the Holocaust in Poland after 1989." Holocaust Studies (2019): 1-22.]. If we were to include opinions of IPN personnel, then we would have to start with an introduction on the present (as opposed to early 2000s) fringe status of the IPN.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 06:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
: Regular appearences actually, not one. Please show why Gontarczyk's radio interview is DUE, given Gontarczyk's record in these matters and coverage of Gontarczyk - who works in the archive of the much maligned IPN - {{tq|"After 2015 the IPN converted into an institution promoting revisionism in reference to Polish-Jewish relations. Previously open attitudes to research and teaching about the Holocaust were amended.}}[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17504902.2019.1567668 Ambrosewicz-Jacobs, Jolanta. "The uses and the abuses of education about the Holocaust in Poland after 1989." Holocaust Studies (2019): 1-22.]. If we were to include opinions of IPN personnel, then we would have to start with an introduction on the present (as opposed to early 2000s) fringe status of the IPN.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 06:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
::Gontarczyk is a professional historian. "Much maligned IPN" is your own POV and bias. Not even gonna take that extremist nonsense form you seriously.[[User:Volunteer Marek|Volunteer Marek]] ([[User talk:Volunteer Marek|talk]]) 15:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)


== May 2019 edits ==
== May 2019 edits ==

Revision as of 15:06, 18 May 2019

psychologist, sociologist

She is psychologist, sociologist,Xx236 (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's quoted by the Center [1]. Poor Center, with friends like Icewhiz they will loose. Xx236 (talk) 10:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dzieje Najnowsze is academic

Please don't remove the reference.Xx236 (talk) 07:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unclear what this is about or why it needs to be included

Maybe you should read something to obtain a clear view?Xx236 (talk) 07:19, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Any critics by Gontarczyk is being remved but prizes by Chrobaczyński are quoted. Xx236 (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Czy bracia Hryć byli polskimi mordercami Żydów? Czyli uwagi na temat naukowej wiarygodności badań prof. Barbary Engelking - ~Were Hryć brothers Polish killers of Jews? Remrks regarding academic reliability of Professor Barbara Engelking's research.Xx236 (talk) 06:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know what's a BLP vio?

Derisively calling a bone fide historian a "radio historian" just because he gave an interview on the radio. More to the point the very idea that just "speaking on the radio" turns an actual historian into a non-reliable radio historian is so freakin' absurd that it's hard to see how anyone could advance such an argument with a straight face. NPR just interviewed some Pulitzer winning authors. Does that turn them from "authors" into "radio-authors".

Can we stop with this nonsense please? Putting up with it is quite tiresome.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regular appearences actually, not one. Please show why Gontarczyk's radio interview is DUE, given Gontarczyk's record in these matters and coverage of Gontarczyk - who works in the archive of the much maligned IPN - "After 2015 the IPN converted into an institution promoting revisionism in reference to Polish-Jewish relations. Previously open attitudes to research and teaching about the Holocaust were amended.Ambrosewicz-Jacobs, Jolanta. "The uses and the abuses of education about the Holocaust in Poland after 1989." Holocaust Studies (2019): 1-22.. If we were to include opinions of IPN personnel, then we would have to start with an introduction on the present (as opposed to early 2000s) fringe status of the IPN.Icewhiz (talk) 06:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Gontarczyk is a professional historian. "Much maligned IPN" is your own POV and bias. Not even gonna take that extremist nonsense form you seriously.Volunteer Marek (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019 edits

Preserving here by providing this link. See #Neutrality please on my Talk page why some of the edits were problematic. On more recent edits, IIRC, the chapter in question was written by a contributor; this material is coatrack for this BLP and belongs in the article on the book. --K.e.coffman (talk) 14:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]