Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
m clean up using AWB (9803)
1ST7 (talk | contribs)
It's been three years since this article was created, and there hasn't been even one heated debate
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|22:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:1ST7|1ST7]] ([[User talk:1ST7|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Law|status=|note=}}
{{GA nominee|22:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:1ST7|1ST7]] ([[User talk:1ST7|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Law|status=|note=}}
{{controversial}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{calm talk}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes

Revision as of 23:18, 20 December 2013

Why were Facebook references removed?

Why were the FB references removed? They are very relevant. Please elaborate. 69.121.234.152 (talk) 02:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove them but would speculate someone thought they weren't very notable. There are FB pages on many topics and we usually don't link them in Wikipedia articles. I moved it to the "External links" section at the bottom, where it is more appropriate. Jonathanwallace (talk) 02:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While I'm all in favor of supporting her in every way, unfortunately unofficial facebook groups spring up around every event, and while they're very good, they aren't material for an encyclopedia. Sorry.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why was her statement removed from the page?

A few weeks ago I added the statement attributed to Asia Bibi on which the court based her blasphemy conviction. A Huffinton Post reference was provided, a CNN reference can also be added: http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/11/christian-woman-sentenced-to-death-for-blasphemy-in-pakistan/. I wonder why would someone need to remove that, because that statement is the very basis of the sentencing that made Asia Bibi's issue important. The "Case" section in the absence of that statement provides only the context and verdict of the case without providing the details of the charge, hence rendering the section incomplete. I would ask the page administrators to please undo the removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.128.109 (talk) 06:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]