Mentioning later interpolation as an opinion rather than fact Tag: Reverted |
Reverted 1 edit by Jasksingh (talk): You are yet to show scholars disagreeing that this is interpolation |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Use Indian English|date=April 2017}} |
{{Use Indian English|date=April 2017}} |
||
[[File:Rama kill shambuka.jpg |thumb|Rama slays Shambuka]] |
[[File:Rama kill shambuka.jpg |thumb|Rama slays Shambuka]] |
||
'''Shambuka''' ([[IAST]]: śambūka) is |
'''Shambuka''' ([[IAST]]: śambūka) is an interpolation in [[Valmiki Ramayana]].<ref name="Paula_2008"/><ref>{{cite book|title=Indian Literature, Issues 213-218|page=163|publisher=[[Sahitya Akademi]]}}</ref> According to the story, Shambuka, a [[shudra]] ascetic, was slain by [[Rama]] for attempting to perform penance in violation of [[dharma]], the bad [[karma]] resulting from which caused the death of a [[Brahmin]]'s son.<ref>Government of Maharashtra, ''Nasik District Gazeteer: History - Ancient Period'' {{cite web |url=http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/gazetteer/nasik/005%20History/001%20AncientPeriod.htm |title=Archived copy |access-date=2006-10-01 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061107163101/http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/gazetteer/nasik/005%20History/001%20AncientPeriod.htm |archive-date=7 November 2006 |df=dmy-all }} (text credited to Mahamahopadhyaya Dr. V. V. Mirashi)</ref> |
||
Rama's killing of Shambuka or even the existence of the character Shambuka is highly disputed. The story is treated as a later [[interpolation (manuscripts)|interpolation]] to Valmiki's ''Ramayana'', being created at a later period in opposition to Brahmins.<ref name="Paula_2008">{{cite book |author=Paula Richman |title=Ramayana Stories in Modern South India: An Anthology |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c-p9Iyk3lpkC&pg=PA111 |year=2008 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-21953-4 |page=111 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=An Introduction to Eastern Ways of Thinking|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|page=158|quote=By now , it can be confirmly said the ' Uttarkand ' of Ramayana is an interpolation of quite later period}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Hinduism, a Gandhian Perspective|page=92|publisher=Anne Books|author=Mangesh Venktesh Nadkarni}}</ref> |
Rama's killing of Shambuka or even the existence of the character Shambuka is highly disputed. The story is treated as a later [[interpolation (manuscripts)|interpolation]] to Valmiki's ''Ramayana'', being created at a later period in opposition to Brahmins.<ref name="Paula_2008">{{cite book |author=Paula Richman |title=Ramayana Stories in Modern South India: An Anthology |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c-p9Iyk3lpkC&pg=PA111 |year=2008 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-21953-4 |page=111 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=An Introduction to Eastern Ways of Thinking|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|page=158|quote=By now , it can be confirmly said the ' Uttarkand ' of Ramayana is an interpolation of quite later period}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Hinduism, a Gandhian Perspective|page=92|publisher=Anne Books|author=Mangesh Venktesh Nadkarni}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 17:35, 30 April 2021
Shambuka (IAST: śambūka) is an interpolation in Valmiki Ramayana.[1][2] According to the story, Shambuka, a shudra ascetic, was slain by Rama for attempting to perform penance in violation of dharma, the bad karma resulting from which caused the death of a Brahmin's son.[3]
Rama's killing of Shambuka or even the existence of the character Shambuka is highly disputed. The story is treated as a later interpolation to Valmiki's Ramayana, being created at a later period in opposition to Brahmins.[1][4][5]
Story
When Rama was ruling Ayodhya, a Brahmin approached the court and told everyone that his young son has died due to the misrule of Rama. Rama immediately called a meeting with all his ministers and enquired about the cause of this. Narada, one of the sages, told him that this has happened due to violation of a rule of penance. Narada informed him that someone from the Shudra varna, who are not allowed to perform penance in this Yuga, is performing a penance due to which the child has died. So Rama went in search of that person and found the place where Shambuka was performing penance. After confirming that Shambuka is indeed a Shudra, Rama killed him. Gods praised Rama for this act of his and congratulated him for protecting their interests and for not allowing Shudra to attain heaven. Brahmin's son returned back to life after it.[1][6]
Reception
Authors such as Rabindranath Tagore, Mahatma Gandhi treat the character of Shambukha as interpolation.[7][8] The Pushtimarg Vaishnavite tradition points out that the Ramayana refers to other Shudras, such as Shabari, who lived in the forest. Shambuka therefore deliberately violated dharma in order to get Rama's attention, and attained salvation when he was beheaded.[9] The celebrated Kannada poet Kuvempu, in his play Shudra Tapasvi shows Rama as having to both carry out his duty by punishing Shambuka, and simultaneously protect Shambuka, as a pious and devout sage, from persecution, and thereby turns the story into a critique of Brahminical attitudes and a defense of Rama.[10]
In his seminal work Annihilation of Caste, Ambedkar points out the story of Shambuka while criticizing Chaturvarnya. He argues that not only it is impossible to accurately classify people into four definite classes but that the system of Chaturvarnya faces the problem of the transgressor. He further explains that unless the transgressor is punished, men will not keep to their respective classes i.e. the whole system will collapse. In Ramayana, according to Ambedkar, Rama ensured that transgression did not happen in his kingdom by killing Shambuka.[11][12][13]
Notes
- ^ a b c Paula Richman (2008). Ramayana Stories in Modern South India: An Anthology. Indiana University Press. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-253-21953-4.
- ^ Indian Literature, Issues 213-218. Sahitya Akademi. p. 163.
- ^ Government of Maharashtra, Nasik District Gazeteer: History - Ancient Period "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 7 November 2006. Retrieved 1 October 2006.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) (text credited to Mahamahopadhyaya Dr. V. V. Mirashi) - ^ An Introduction to Eastern Ways of Thinking. Concept Publishing Company. p. 158.
By now , it can be confirmly said the ' Uttarkand ' of Ramayana is an interpolation of quite later period
- ^ Mangesh Venktesh Nadkarni. Hinduism, a Gandhian Perspective. Anne Books. p. 92.
- ^ Hari Prasad Shastri (1957). The Ramayana of Valmiki. Shanti Sadan. pp. 1579–1584. ISBN 978-0-8542-4048-7.
- ^ Gangeya Mukherji. An Alternative Idea of India: Tagore and Vivekananda. Taylor & Francis. p. 83. ISBN 9781000083774.
- ^ D. K. Misra, Shambhu Lal Doshi, C. M. Jain (1972). Gandhi and Social Order. Research Publications in Social Sciences. p. 14.
Mahatma Gandhi , on the other hand, has regarded this entire story as an interpolation
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Motiramji Sastri, Ramayan (in Gujarati) (Ahmedabad, 1961).
- ^ 'M. Raghava, "The king and the protector of the devout" The Hindu (26 October 2004).
- ^ B.R. Ambedkar (2020). Ambedkar's India. Sristhi Publishers & Distributors. p. 47. ISBN 9789387022898.
- ^ Aishwary Kumar (2015). Radical Equality: Ambedkar, Gandhi, and the Risk of Democracy. Stanford University Press. p. 292. ISBN 9780804794268.
- ^ Kurukundi Raghavendra Rao (1993). Babasaheb Ambedkar. Sahitya Akademi. p. 25. ISBN 9788172011529.