Content deleted Content added
→Bibliography: fix |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The '''Puyas''' ({{lang-mni|ꯄꯨꯌꯥ}}) are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.{{sfnp|Laishram}} They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including [[genealogy]], [[literature]], [[history]], [[royalties]], administration, [[creation myth|creation]] and [[cosmology]], [[philosophy]], [[poetry]], [[religious belief]]s, etc.{{sfnp|Laishram}} |
The '''Puyas''' ({{lang-mni|ꯄꯨꯌꯥ}}) are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.{{sfnp|Laishram}} They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including [[genealogy]], [[literature]], [[history]], [[royalties]], administration, [[creation myth|creation]] and [[cosmology]], [[philosophy]], [[poetry]], [[religious belief]]s, etc.{{sfnp|Laishram}} |
||
== Criticism == |
|||
Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=10}} Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11}} Scholars have noted that Puyas had been forged by [[Meitei nationalism|Meitei Nationalists]] to support their [[Invented tradition|reinvention of history and tradition]].{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11,17}}{{sfnp|Brandt|2005|pp=128}}{{sfnp|Naorem|2015|pp=219}} |
Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=10}} Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11}} Scholars have noted that Puyas had been forged by [[Meitei nationalism|Meitei Nationalists]] to support their [[Invented tradition|reinvention of history and tradition]].{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11,17}}{{sfnp|Brandt|2005|pp=128}}{{sfnp|Naorem|2015|pp=219}} |
||
Revision as of 03:50, 12 June 2022
 ꯄꯨꯌꯥ ꯂꯥꯢꯔꯤꯛ | |
| Language | Meetei language |
|---|---|
| No. of books | more than 120 (Nongsamei Puya, Sanamahi Laihui, Numit Kappa, etc.) |
The Puyas (Meitei: ꯄꯨꯌꯥ) are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.[1] They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including genealogy, literature, history, royalties, administration, creation and cosmology, philosophy, poetry, religious beliefs, etc.[1]
Criticism
Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.[2] Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.[3] Scholars have noted that Puyas had been forged by Meitei Nationalists to support their reinvention of history and tradition.[4][5][6]
See Also
References
- ^ a b Laishram.
- ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 10.
- ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11.
- ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11, 17.
- ^ Brandt (2005), pp. 128.
- ^ Naorem (2015), pp. 219.
Bibliography
- Brandt, Carmen (5 December 2017). "Writing off domination: the Chakma and Meitei script movements". South Asian History and Culture. doi:10.1080/19472498.2017.1411050. ISSN 1947-2498.
- Laishram, Sadhana. "Conservation and preservation of Manuscripts in Manipur" (PDF).
- Naorem, Naorem Malemsanba (2015). "Centrality of body politics in Thokachanba's script and cultural revivalism in Manipur". Colonialism and Resistance: Society and State in Manipur. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315638317.
- Rajshekhar, M. "In violence-scarred Manipur, ancient scrolls show why AFSPA will not work". Scroll.in. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
- Parratt, Saroj Nalini Arambam (2005). The Court Chronicle of the Kings of Manipur: The Cheitharon Kumpapa : Original Text, Translation, and Notes. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-34430-1.
| Production | |
|---|---|
| Consumption | |
| By country | |
| Other |
|
| Related | |
