Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
edit details
Distraction
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 13: Line 13:


Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=10}} Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11}} Scholars have noted that Puyas were actively forged by [[Meitei nationalism|Meitei Nationalists]] to support their [[Invented tradition|reinvention of history and tradition]].{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11,17}}{{sfnp|Brandt|2005|pp=128}}{{sfnp|Naorem|2015|pp=219}}
Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=10}} Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11}} Scholars have noted that Puyas were actively forged by [[Meitei nationalism|Meitei Nationalists]] to support their [[Invented tradition|reinvention of history and tradition]].{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11,17}}{{sfnp|Brandt|2005|pp=128}}{{sfnp|Naorem|2015|pp=219}}

{{Infobox religious text
| religion = [[Sanamahism]]
| image = Wakching.jpg
| image_size = 300px
| language = [[Meetei language]]
| alt =
| chapters =
| caption = [[Sanamahi Laihui]]
}}


==See Also==
==See Also==

Revision as of 19:55, 23 May 2021

Puyas
LanguageMeetei language
No. of booksmore than 120 (Nongsamei Puya, Sanamahi Laihui, Numit Kappa, etc.)

The Puyas (Meitei: ꯄꯨꯌꯥ) are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.[1] They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including genealogy, literature, history, royalties, administration, creation and cosmology, philosophy, poetry, religious beliefs, etc.[1]

Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.[2] Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.[3] Scholars have noted that Puyas were actively forged by Meitei Nationalists to support their reinvention of history and tradition.[4][5][6]

See Also

References

  1. ^ a b Laishram.
  2. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 10.
  3. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11.
  4. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11, 17.
  5. ^ Brandt (2005), pp. 128.
  6. ^ Naorem (2015), pp. 219.

Bibliography

history