Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Details
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
+
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Infobox book series
{{Infobox book series
| name = Puyas
| name = Puyas
| image =
| image = A picture of Puya(Meitei text).jpg
| image_caption = ꯄꯨꯌꯥ ꯂꯥꯢꯔꯤꯛ
| image_caption = {{manipuri|ꯄꯨꯌꯥ ꯂꯥꯢꯔꯤꯛ|xlit=yes}}
| books =
| books =
| language =[[Meetei language]]
| language =[[Meitei language]]
| number_of_books = more than 120 ([[Nongsamei Puya]], [[Sanamahi Laihui]], [[Numit Kappa]], etc.)
| number_of_books = more than 120
}}
}}


The '''Puyas''' ({{lang-mni|ꯄꯨꯌꯥ}}) are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.{{sfnp|Laishram}} They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including [[genealogy]], [[literature]], [[history]], [[royalties]], administration, [[creation myth|creation]] and [[cosmology]], [[philosophy]], [[poetry]], [[religious belief]]s, etc.{{sfnp|Laishram}}
The '''Puyas''' {{manipuri|ꯄꯨꯌꯥ}} are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.{{sfnp|Laishram}} They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including [[genealogy]], [[literature]], [[history]], [[royalties]], administration, [[creation myth|creation]] and [[cosmology]], [[philosophy]], [[poetry]], [[religious belief]]s, etc.{{sfnp|Laishram}}


Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=10}} Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat Puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri History.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11}} Scholars have noted that Puyas were actively forged by Meitei Nationalists to support their [[Invented tradition|reinvention of history and tradition]].{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11,17}}{{sfnp|Brandt|2005|pp=128}}{{sfnp|Naorem|2015|pp=219}}
Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet to be dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=10}} Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri history.{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11}} Scholars have noted that puyas had been forged by [[Meitei nationalism|Meitei nationalists]] to support their [[Invented tradition|reinvention of history and tradition]].{{sfnp|Parratt|2005|pp=11,17}}{{sfnp|Brandt|2005|pp=128}}{{sfnp|Naorem|2015|pp=219}}


⚫
==See also==
{{Infobox religious text
| religion = [[Sanamahism]]
| image = Wakching.jpg
| image_size = 300px
| language = [[Meetei language]]
| alt =
| chapters =
| caption = [[Sanamahi Laihui]]
}}

⚫
==See Also==
* [[Meitei literature]]
* [[Meitei literature]]
* [[Sanamahism]]
* [[Sanamahism]]
* [[Puya Meithaba]]


==References==
==References==
Line 37: Line 28:
* {{Cite web|last=Rajshekhar|first=M.|title=In violence-scarred Manipur, ancient scrolls show why AFSPA will not work|url=http://scroll.in/article/733295/in-violence-scarred-manipur-ancient-scrolls-show-why-afspa-will-not-work|access-date=23 October 2020|website=Scroll.in|language=en-US}}
* {{Cite web|last=Rajshekhar|first=M.|title=In violence-scarred Manipur, ancient scrolls show why AFSPA will not work|url=http://scroll.in/article/733295/in-violence-scarred-manipur-ancient-scrolls-show-why-afspa-will-not-work|access-date=23 October 2020|website=Scroll.in|language=en-US}}
* {{Cite book|last=Parratt|first=Saroj Nalini Arambam|title=The Court Chronicle of the Kings of Manipur: The Cheitharon Kumpapa : Original Text, Translation, and Notes|date=2005|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-34430-1|location=London}}
* {{Cite book|last=Parratt|first=Saroj Nalini Arambam|title=The Court Chronicle of the Kings of Manipur: The Cheitharon Kumpapa : Original Text, Translation, and Notes|date=2005|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0-415-34430-1|location=London}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Naorem |first=Deepak |date=October 2022 |title=Taming the ‘rude’ and ‘barbarous’ tongues of the frontier: Bor Saheps, Sutu Saheps and their encounters with languages, scripts, and texts (1835–1904) |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00194646221130814 |journal=The Indian Economic & Social History Review |language=en |volume=59 |issue=4 |pages=471–506 |doi=10.1177/00194646221130814 |issn=0019-4646}}


{{Books}}
{{Books}}
Line 44: Line 36:
[[Category:Meitei language]]
[[Category:Meitei language]]
[[Category:Meitei culture]]
[[Category:Meitei culture]]
[[Category:Puya (Meitei texts)| ]]
[[Category:History of Manipur]]
[[Category:History of Manipur]]
[[Category:Sanamahism]]
[[Category:Sanamahism]]
[[Category:Manipur]]

Latest revision as of 07:28, 4 April 2024

Puyas
(Manipuri: ꯄꯨꯌꯥ ꯂꯥꯢꯔꯤꯛ, romanized: pooyaa laaireek)
LanguageMeitei language
No. of booksmore than 120

The Puyas (Manipuri: ꯄꯨꯌꯥ) are archaic Manipuri manuscripts.[1] They encompass a wide spectrum of themes including genealogy, literature, history, royalties, administration, creation and cosmology, philosophy, poetry, religious beliefs, etc.[1]

Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet to be dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny.[2] Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri history.[3] Scholars have noted that puyas had been forged by Meitei nationalists to support their reinvention of history and tradition.[4][5][6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Laishram.
  2. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 10.
  3. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11.
  4. ^ Parratt (2005), pp. 11, 17.
  5. ^ Brandt (2005), pp. 128.
  6. ^ Naorem (2015), pp. 219.

Bibliography[edit]

history

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puya_(Meitei_texts)&diff=1217170724&oldid=1024698870