Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Izno (talk | contribs)
clean refs
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Highpeaks35 (talk | contribs)
Per User:Bbb23 comment, undid the unjust rollback by User:AshLin. Removed mainly unreferenced content, most since 2016, added a reference, and fixed spelling.
Line 46: Line 46:
| caption2 =
| caption2 =
}}
}}
The Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) encompassed much of [[Pakistan]], western [[India]], and northeastern [[Afghanistan]]; extending from Pakistani [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]] in the west to [[Uttar Pradesh]] in the east, northeastern Afghanistan in the north and [[Maharashtra]] in the south. The largest number of sites are in [[Gujarat]], [[Haryana]], [[Punjab, India|Punjab]], [[Rajasthan]], [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Jammu and Kashmir]] states in India,<ref name="Singh2008"/> and [[Sindh]], [[Punjab, Pakistan|Punjab]], and [[Balochistan (Pakistan)|Balochistan]] provinces in Pakistan.<ref name="Singh2008"/> Coastal settlements extended from [[Sutkagan Dor]]<ref>{{cite journal|last=Dales|first=George F.|year=1962|title=Harappan Outposts on the Makran Coast|journal=Antiquity|volume=36|issue=142|page=86}}</ref> in Western Baluchistan to [[Lothal]]<ref>{{cite book|first=Shikaripura Ranganatha|last=Rao|authorlink=Shikaripura Ranganatha Rao|year=1973|title=Lothal and the Indus civilization|location=London|publisher=Asia Publishing House|isbn=978-0210222782}}</ref> in Gujarat. An Indus Valley site has been found on the [[Oxus River]] at [[Shortugai]] in northern Afghanistan,<ref>{{Harvnb|Kenoyer|1998|p=96}}</ref> in the [[Gomal River]] valley in northwestern Pakistan,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Dani|first=Ahmad Hassan|year=1970–1971|title=Excavations in the Gomal Valley|journal=Ancient Pakistan|issue=5|pages=1–177|authorlink=Ahmad Hasan Dani}}</ref> at [[Manda, Jammu]] on the [[Beas River]] near [[Jammu]],<ref>{{cite book|title=Harappan Civilization: A recent perspective|last=Joshi|first=J.P.|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1982|location=New Delhi|pages=185–195|chapter=Manda: A Harappan site in Jammu and Kashmir|author2=Bala, M.|editor=Possehl Gregory L.}}</ref> India, and at [[Alamgirpur]] on the [[Hindon River]], only 28&nbsp;km from Delhi.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology, A Review (1958–1959)|publisher=Archaeol. Surv. India|editor=A. Ghosh|location=Delhi|pages=51–52|chapter=Excavations at Alamgirpur}}<!-- Needs clarification --></ref> The southern most site of the Indus valley civilisation is [[Daimabad]] in Maharashtra. Indus Valley sites have been found most often on rivers, but also on the ancient seacoast,<ref>{{cite book|last=Ray|first=Himanshu Prabha|year=2003|title=The Archaeology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0521011099|page=95}}</ref> for example, Balakot,<ref>{{cite book|title=South Asian Archaeology 1977|last=Dales|first=George F.|publisher=Seminario di Studi Asiatici Series Minor 6. Instituto Universitario Orientate|year=1979|location=Naples|pages=241–274|chapter=The Balakot Project: summary of four years excavations in Pakistan|editor=Maurizio Taddei}}</ref> and on islands, for example, [[Dholavira]].<ref>{{cite book|title=History and Archaeology|last=Bisht|first=R.S.|publisher=Ramanand Vidya Bhawan|year=1989|isbn=978-8185205465|location=New Delhi|pages=379–408|chapter=A new model of the Harappan town planning as revealed at Dholavira in Kutch: a surface study of its plan and architecture|editor=Chatterjee Bhaskar}}</ref>
The Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) encompassed much of [[Pakistan]], western [[India]], and northeastern [[Afghanistan]]; extending from Pakistani [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]] in the west to [[Uttar Pradesh]] in the east, northeastern Afghanistan in the north and [[Maharashtra]] in the south.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.harappa.com/har/indus-saraswati-geography.html | title=The Largest Bronze Age Urban Civilization | publisher=harappa.com | accessdate=29 April 2013}}</ref> [[Shortugai]] to the north is on the [[Oxus River]], the Afghan border with [[Tajikistan]], and in the west [[Sutkagan Dor]] is close to the Iranian border. The [[Kulli culture]] of Balochistan, of which more than 100 settlement sites are known, can be regarded as a local variant of the IVC, or a related culture.


It flourished along the system of monsoon-fed perennial rivers in the basins of the Ghaggar-Hakra River in northwest India, and the Indus River flowing through the length of Pakistan.{{Sfn|Wright|2010|p=1}}<ref name=agu-198>{{citation|last1=Maemoku|first1=Hideaki|last2=Shitaoka|first2=Yorinao|last3=Nagatomo|first3=Tsuneto; Yagi, Hiroshi|editor=Giosan, Liviu |editor2=Fuller, Dorian Q. |editor3=Nicoll, Kathleen |title=Climates, Landscapes, and Civilizations|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D7aw5mfscBMC|series=American Geophysical Union Monograph Series 198|year=2013|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1118704431|chapter=Geomorphological Constraints on the Ghaggar River Regime During the Mature Harappan Period}}</ref><ref name="Giosan">{{cite journal|last=Giosan|first=L.|title=Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|year=2012|volume=109|issue=26|url=http://www.pnas.org/content/109/26/E1688.full|display-authors=etal|doi=10.1073/pnas.1112743109|pages=E1688–E1694|pmid=22645375|pmc=3387054|bibcode=2012PNAS..109E1688G}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|name="Giosan"|Giosan: "Numerous speculations have advanced the idea that the Ghaggar-Hakra fluvial system, at times identified with the lost mythical river of Sarasvati (e.g., 4, 5, 7, 19), was a large glacier fed Himalayan river. Potential sources for this river include the Yamuna River, the Sutlej River, or both rivers. However, the lack of large-scale incision on the interfluve demonstrates that large, glacier-fed rivers did not flow across the Ghaggar-Hakra region during the Holocene [...] The present Ghaggar-Hakra valley and its tributary rivers are currently dry or have seasonal flows. Yet rivers were undoubtedly active in this region during the Urban Harappan Phase. We recovered sandy fluvial deposits approximately 5,400 y old at Fort Abbas in Pakistan (SI Text), and recent work (33) on the upper Ghaggar-Hakra interfluve in India also documented Holocene channel sands that are approximately 4,300 y old. On the upper interfluve, fine-grained floodplain deposition continued until the end of the Late Harappan Phase, as recent as 2,900 y ago (33) (Fig. 2B). This widespread fluvial redistribution of sediment suggests that reliable monsoon rains were able to sustain perennial rivers earlier during the Holocene and explains why Harappan settlements flourished along the entire Ghaggar-Hakra system without access to a glacier-fed river."<ref name="Giosan"/>}} There is evidence of dry river beds overlapping with the [[Ghaggar-Hakra River|Ghaggar River]] in India and [[Hakra]] channel in Pakistan. Along the dried up river beds of the [[Ghaggar-Hakra River]] and its tributaries and the Indus River valley, 616 sites have been discovered in India,<ref name="Singh2008"/> while 406 sites have been found in Pakistan.<ref name="Singh2008"/>
The geography of the Indus Valley put the civilisations that arose there in a highly similar situation to those in [[Egypt]] and [[Peru]], with rich agricultural lands being surrounded by highlands, desert, and ocean. Recently, Indus sites have been discovered in Pakistan's [[Khyber Pakhtunkhwa]] as well. Other IVC colonies can be found in Afghanistan while smaller isolated colonies can be found as far away as [[Turkmenistan]] and in Maharashtra. The largest number of sites are in [[Gujarat]], [[Haryana]], [[Punjab, India|Punjab]], [[Rajasthan]], [[Uttar Pradesh]], [[Jammu and Kashmir]] states in India,<ref name="Singh2008"/> and [[Sindh]], [[Punjab, Pakistan|Punjab]], and [[Balochistan (Pakistan)|Balochistan]] provinces in Pakistan.<ref name="Singh2008"/> Coastal settlements extended from [[Sutkagan Dor]]<ref>{{cite journal|last=Dales|first=George F.|year=1962|title=Harappan Outposts on the Makran Coast|journal=Antiquity|volume=36|issue=142|page=86}}</ref> in Western Baluchistan to [[Lothal]]<ref>{{cite book|first=Shikaripura Ranganatha|last=Rao|authorlink=Shikaripura Ranganatha Rao|year=1973|title=Lothal and the Indus civilization|location=London|publisher=Asia Publishing House|isbn=978-0210222782}}</ref> in Gujarat. An Indus Valley site has been found on the [[Oxus]] River at Shortughai in northern Afghanistan,<ref>{{Harvnb|Kenoyer|1998|p=96}}</ref> in the [[Gomal River]] valley in northwestern Pakistan,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Dani|first=Ahmad Hassan|year=1970–1971|title=Excavations in the Gomal Valley|journal=Ancient Pakistan|issue=5|pages=1–177|authorlink=Ahmad Hasan Dani}}</ref> at [[Manda, Jammu]] on the [[Beas River]] near [[Jammu]],<ref>{{cite book|title=Harappan Civilization: A recent perspective|last=Joshi|first=J.P.|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1982|location=New Delhi|pages=185–195|chapter=Manda: A Harappan site in Jammu and Kashmir|author2=Bala, M.|editor=Possehl Gregory L.}}</ref> India, and at [[Alamgirpur]] on the [[Hindon River]], only 28&nbsp;km from Delhi.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology, A Review (1958–1959)|publisher=Archaeol. Surv. India|editor=A. Ghosh|location=Delhi|pages=51–52|chapter=Excavations at Alamgirpur}}<!-- Needs clarification --></ref> The southern most site of the Indus valley civilisation is [[Daimabad]] in Maharashtra. Indus Valley sites have been found most often on rivers, but also on the ancient seacoast,<ref>{{cite book|last=Ray|first=Himanshu Prabha|year=2003|title=The Archaeology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0521011099|page=95}}</ref> for example, Balakot,<ref>{{cite book|title=South Asian Archaeology 1977|last=Dales|first=George F.|publisher=Seminario di Studi Asiatici Series Minor 6. Instituto Universitario Orientate|year=1979|location=Naples|pages=241–274|chapter=The Balakot Project: summary of four years excavations in Pakistan|editor=Maurizio Taddei}}</ref> and on islands, for example, [[Dholavira]].<ref>{{cite book|title=History and Archaeology|last=Bisht|first=R.S.|publisher=Ramanand Vidya Bhawan|year=1989|isbn=978-8185205465|location=New Delhi|pages=379–408|chapter=A new model of the Harappan town planning as revealed at Dholavira in Kutch: a surface study of its plan and architecture|editor=Chatterjee Bhaskar}}</ref>

It flourished along the system of monsoon-fed perennial rivers in the basins of the Ghaggar-Hakra River in northwest India, and the Indus River flowing through the length of Pakistan.{{Sfn|Wright|2010|p=1}}<ref name=agu-198>{{citation|last1=Maemoku|first1=Hideaki|last2=Shitaoka|first2=Yorinao|last3=Nagatomo|first3=Tsuneto; Yagi, Hiroshi|editor=Giosan, Liviu |editor2=Fuller, Dorian Q. |editor3=Nicoll, Kathleen |title=Climates, Landscapes, and Civilizations|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D7aw5mfscBMC|series=American Geophysical Union Monograph Series 198|year=2013|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1118704431|chapter=Geomorphological Constraints on the Ghaggar River Regime During the Mature Harappan Period}}</ref><ref name="Giosan">{{cite journal|last=Giosan|first=L.|title=Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|year=2012|volume=109|issue=26|url=http://www.pnas.org/content/109/26/E1688.full|display-authors=etal|doi=10.1073/pnas.1112743109|pages=E1688–E1694|pmid=22645375|pmc=3387054|bibcode=2012PNAS..109E1688G}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|name="Giosan"|Giosan: "Numerous speculations have advanced the idea that the Ghaggar-Hakra fluvial system, at times identified with the lost mythical river of Sarasvati (e.g., 4, 5, 7, 19), was a large glacier fed Himalayan river. Potential sources for this river include the Yamuna River, the Sutlej River, or both rivers. However, the lack of large-scale incision on the interfluve demonstrates that large, glacier-fed rivers did not flow across the Ghaggar-Hakra region during the Holocene [...] The present Ghaggar-Hakra valley and its tributary rivers are currently dry or have seasonal flows. Yet rivers were undoubtedly active in this region during the Urban Harappan Phase. We recovered sandy fluvial deposits approximately 5,400 y old at Fort Abbas in Pakistan (SI Text), and recent work (33) on the upper Ghaggar-Hakra interfluve in India also documented Holocene channel sands that are approximately 4,300 y old. On the upper interfluve, fine-grained floodplain deposition continued until the end of the Late Harappan Phase, as recent as 2,900 y ago (33) (Fig. 2B). This widespread fluvial redistribution of sediment suggests that reliable monsoon rains were able to sustain perennial rivers earlier during the Holocene and explains why Harappan settlements flourished along the entire Ghaggar-Hakra system without access to a glacier-fed river."<ref name="Giosan"/>}} There is evidence of dry river beds overlapping with the [[Ghaggar-Hakra River|Ghaggar River]] in India and [[Hakra]] channel in Pakistan. According to Shereen Ratnagar, the Ghaggar-Hakra area has more remaining sites than the alluvium of the Indus Valley, since the Ghaggar-Hakra desert area has been left untouched by settlements and agriculture since the end of the Indus Valley Civilisation.<ref name="s2016"/> Along the dried up river beds of the [[Ghaggar-Hakra River]] and its tributaries and the Indus River valley, 616 sites have been discovered in India,<ref name="Singh2008"/> while 406 sites have been found in Pakistan.<ref name="Singh2008"/>


== Discovery and history of excavation ==
== Discovery and history of excavation ==
Line 187: Line 185:
According to J.G. Shaffer and D.A. Lichtenstein,<ref>{{cite book|title=Old Problems and New Perspectives in the Archaeology of South Asia|last=Shaffer|first=Jim G.|year=1989|series=Wisconsin Archaeological Reports 2|pages=117–126|chapter=Ethnicity and Change in the Indus Valley Cultural Tradition|authorlink=Jim G. Shaffer|author2=Lichtenstein, Diane A.}}</ref> the Mature Harappan Civilisation was "a fusion of the Bagor, Hakra, and Kot Diji traditions or 'ethnic groups' in the Ghaggar-Hakra valley on the borders of India and Pakistan".<ref name="possehl" />
According to J.G. Shaffer and D.A. Lichtenstein,<ref>{{cite book|title=Old Problems and New Perspectives in the Archaeology of South Asia|last=Shaffer|first=Jim G.|year=1989|series=Wisconsin Archaeological Reports 2|pages=117–126|chapter=Ethnicity and Change in the Indus Valley Cultural Tradition|authorlink=Jim G. Shaffer|author2=Lichtenstein, Diane A.}}</ref> the Mature Harappan Civilisation was "a fusion of the Bagor, Hakra, and Kot Diji traditions or 'ethnic groups' in the Ghaggar-Hakra valley on the borders of India and Pakistan".<ref name="possehl" />


By 2600 BCE, the Early Harappan communities turned into large urban centres. Such urban centres include [[Harappa]], [[Ganeriwala]], [[Mohenjo-daro]] in modern-day Pakistan, and [[Dholavira]], [[Kalibangan]], [[Rakhigarhi]], [[Rupar]], and [[Lothal]] in modern-day India.<ref name="re-enters">{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indus-river-re-enters-india/1/158976.html |title=Indus re-enters India after two centuries, feeds Little Rann, Nal Sarovar |publisher=India Today|date=7 November 2011 |accessdate=7 November 2011}}</ref> In total, more than 1,052 cities and settlements have been found, mainly in the general region of the Indus Rivers and their tributaries.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}}
By 2600 BCE, the Early Harappan communities turned into large urban centres. Such urban centres include [[Harappa]], [[Ganeriwala]], [[Mohenjo-daro]] in modern-day Pakistan, and [[Dholavira]], [[Kalibangan]], [[Rakhigarhi]], [[Rupar]], and [[Lothal]] in modern-day India.<ref name="re-enters">{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indus-river-re-enters-india/1/158976.html |title=Indus re-enters India after two centuries, feeds Little Rann, Nal Sarovar |publisher=India Today|date=7 November 2011 |accessdate=7 November 2011}}</ref> In total, more than 1,000 cities and settlements have been found, mainly in the general region of the Indus and Ghaggar-Hakra Rivers and their tributaries.<ref name="MorrisonJunker2002"/>


=== Cities ===
=== Cities ===
[[File:Sokhta Koh.jpg|right|thumb|Computer-aided reconstruction of coastal Harappan settlement at Sokhta Koh near [[Pasni City|Pasni]], Pakistan]]
[[File:Sokhta Koh.jpg|right|thumb|Computer-aided reconstruction of coastal Harappan settlement at Sokhta Koh near [[Pasni City|Pasni]], Pakistan]]
A sophisticated and technologically advanced urban culture is evident in the Indus Valley Civilisation, making them the first urban centre in the region. The quality of municipal town planning suggests the knowledge of [[urban planning]] and efficient municipal governments which placed a high priority on [[hygiene]], or, alternatively, accessibility to the means of religious ritual.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}}
A sophisticated and technologically advanced urban culture is evident in the Indus Valley Civilisation, making them the first urban centre in the region. The quality of municipal town planning suggests the knowledge of [[urban planning]] and efficient municipal governments which placed a high priority on [[hygiene]], or, alternatively, accessibility to the means of religious ritual.<ref name="Possehl2002">{{cite book|author=Gregory L. Possehl|title=The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XVgeAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA193|date=11 November 2002|publisher=Rowman Altamira|isbn=978-0-7591-1642-9|pages=193–}}</ref>


As seen in Harappa, Mohenjo-daro and the recently partially excavated [[Rakhigarhi]], this urban plan included the world's first known urban [[sanitation]] systems: see [[hydraulic engineering of the Indus Valley Civilisation]]. Within the city, individual homes or groups of homes obtained water from [[water well|wells]]. From a room that appears to have been set aside for bathing, [[wastewater|waste water]] was directed to covered drains, which lined the major streets. Houses opened only to inner [[courtyard]]s and smaller lanes. The house-building in some villages in the region still resembles in some respects the house-building of the Harappans.<ref>It has been noted that the courtyard pattern and techniques of flooring of Harappan houses has similarities to the way house-building is still done in some villages of the region. {{Harvnb|Lal|2002|pp=93–95}}</ref>
As seen in Harappa, Mohenjo-daro and the recently partially excavated [[Rakhigarhi]], this urban plan included the world's first known urban [[sanitation]] systems: see [[hydraulic engineering of the Indus Valley Civilisation]]. Within the city, individual homes or groups of homes obtained water from [[water well|wells]]. From a room that appears to have been set aside for bathing, [[wastewater|waste water]] was directed to covered drains, which lined the major streets. Houses opened only to inner [[courtyard]]s and smaller lanes. The house-building in some villages in the region still resembles in some respects the house-building of the Harappans.<ref>It has been noted that the courtyard pattern and techniques of flooring of Harappan houses has similarities to the way house-building is still done in some villages of the region. {{Harvnb|Lal|2002|pp=93–95}}</ref>
Line 198: Line 196:


[[File:Mohenjo-daro Priesterkönig.jpeg|thumb|right|So-called "Priest King" statue, [[Mohenjo-daro]], late [[Mature Harappan]] period, National Museum, Karachi, Pakistan]]
[[File:Mohenjo-daro Priesterkönig.jpeg|thumb|right|So-called "Priest King" statue, [[Mohenjo-daro]], late [[Mature Harappan]] period, National Museum, Karachi, Pakistan]]
The purpose of the citadel remains debated. In sharp contrast to this civilisation's contemporaries, [[Mesopotamia]] and [[ancient Egypt]], no large monumental structures were built. There is no conclusive evidence of palaces or temples – or of kings, armies, or priests. Some structures are thought to have been granaries. Found at one city is an enormous well-built bath (the "[[Great Bath, Mohenjo-daro|Great Bath]]"), which may have been a public bath. Although the citadels were walled, it is far from clear that these structures were defensive. They may have been built to divert flood waters.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}}
The purpose of the citadel remains debated. In sharp contrast to this civilisation's contemporaries, [[Mesopotamia]] and [[ancient Egypt]], no large monumental structures were built. There is no conclusive evidence of palaces or temples – or of kings, armies, or priests. Some structures are thought to have been granaries. Found at one city is an enormous well-built bath (the "[[Great Bath, Mohenjo-daro|Great Bath]]"), which may have been a public bath. Although the citadels were walled, it is far from clear that these structures were defensive.


Most city dwellers appear to have been traders or artisans, who lived with others pursuing the same occupation in well-defined neighbourhoods. Materials from distant regions were used in the cities for constructing seals, beads and other objects. Among the [[artifact (archaeology)|artefacts]] discovered were beautiful glazed [[faïence]] beads. [[Steatite]] seals have images of animals, people (perhaps gods), and other types of inscriptions, including the yet un-deciphered [[Indus script|writing system of the Indus Valley Civilisation]]. Some of the seals were used to stamp clay on trade goods and most probably had other uses as well.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}}
Most city dwellers appear to have been traders or artisans, who lived with others pursuing the same occupation in well-defined neighbourhoods. Materials from distant regions were used in the cities for constructing seals, beads and other objects. Among the [[artifact (archaeology)|artefacts]] discovered were beautiful glazed [[faïence]] beads. [[Steatite]] seals have images of animals, people (perhaps gods), and other types of inscriptions, including the yet un-deciphered [[Indus script|writing system of the Indus Valley Civilisation]]. Some of the seals were used to stamp clay on trade goods.


Although some houses were larger than others, Indus Civilisation cities were remarkable for their apparent, if relative, [[egalitarianism]]. All the houses had access to water and drainage facilities. This gives the impression of a society with relatively low [[wealth concentration]], though clear social levelling is seen in personal adornments. {{clarify|date=March 2016}}
Although some houses were larger than others, Indus Civilisation cities were remarkable for their apparent, if relative, [[egalitarianism]]. All the houses had access to water and drainage facilities. This gives the impression of a society with relatively low [[wealth concentration]], though clear social levelling is seen in personal adornments. {{clarify|date=March 2016}}
Line 275: Line 273:
Thousands of steatite seals have been recovered, and their physical character is fairly consistent. In size they range from {{fraction|3|4}} inch to 1{{fraction|1|2}} inches square. In most cases they have a pierced boss at the back to accommodate a cord for handling or for use as personal adornment.
Thousands of steatite seals have been recovered, and their physical character is fairly consistent. In size they range from {{fraction|3|4}} inch to 1{{fraction|1|2}} inches square. In most cases they have a pierced boss at the back to accommodate a cord for handling or for use as personal adornment.


Seals have been found at [[Mohenjo-daro]] depicting a figure standing on its head, and another sitting cross-legged in what some call a [[yoga]]-like pose (see image, the so-called ''Pashupati'', below).{{citation needed|date=May 2016}} This figure, sometimes known as a [[Pashupati seal|Pashupati]], has been variously identified. Sir John Marshall identified a resemblance to the Hindu god, Shiva.<ref>Marshall, Sir John. Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilisation, 3 vols, London: Arthur Probsthain, 1931</ref> If this can be validated, it would be evidence that some aspects of Hinduism predate the earliest texts, the Veda.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}}
Seals have been found at [[Mohenjo-daro]] depicting a figure standing on its head, and another sitting cross-legged in what some call a [[yoga]]-like pose (see image, the so-called ''Pashupati'', below).{{citation needed|date=May 2016}} This figure, sometimes known as a [[Pashupati seal|Pashupati]], has been variously identified. Sir John Marshall identified a resemblance to the Hindu god, Shiva.<ref>Marshall, Sir John. Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilisation, 3 vols, London: Arthur Probsthain, 1931</ref>


A harp-like instrument depicted on an Indus seal and two shell objects found at Lothal indicate the use of stringed musical instruments.
A harp-like instrument depicted on an Indus seal and two shell objects found at Lothal indicate the use of stringed musical instruments.
Line 288: Line 286:


There was an extensive maritime trade network operating between the Harappan and Mesopotamian civilisations as early as the middle Harappan Phase, with much commerce being handled by "middlemen merchants from Dilmun" (modern [[Bahrain]] and [[Failaka]] located in the [[Persian Gulf]]).<ref>{{cite book|title=Underwater archaeology proceedings of the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference at Kingston, Jamaica 1992|last=Neyland|first=R.S.|publisher=Society for Historical Archaeology|year=1992|location=Tucson, AZ|pages=68–74|chapter=The seagoing vessels on Dilmun seals|editor=Keith, D.H.|editor2=Carrell T.L.}}</ref> Such long-distance sea trade became feasible with the development of plank-built watercraft, equipped with a single central mast supporting a sail of woven rushes or cloth.<ref name="Maurizio Tosi 1993, pp. 745-61">Maurizio Tosi, "Black Boats of Magan. Some Thoughts on Bronze Age Water Transport in Oman and beyond from the Impressed Bitumen Slabs of Ra's al-Junayz", in A. Parpola (ed), South Asian Archaeology 1993, Helsinki, 1995, pp. 745–761 (in collaboration with Serge Cleuziou)</ref>
There was an extensive maritime trade network operating between the Harappan and Mesopotamian civilisations as early as the middle Harappan Phase, with much commerce being handled by "middlemen merchants from Dilmun" (modern [[Bahrain]] and [[Failaka]] located in the [[Persian Gulf]]).<ref>{{cite book|title=Underwater archaeology proceedings of the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference at Kingston, Jamaica 1992|last=Neyland|first=R.S.|publisher=Society for Historical Archaeology|year=1992|location=Tucson, AZ|pages=68–74|chapter=The seagoing vessels on Dilmun seals|editor=Keith, D.H.|editor2=Carrell T.L.}}</ref> Such long-distance sea trade became feasible with the development of plank-built watercraft, equipped with a single central mast supporting a sail of woven rushes or cloth.<ref name="Maurizio Tosi 1993, pp. 745-61">Maurizio Tosi, "Black Boats of Magan. Some Thoughts on Bronze Age Water Transport in Oman and beyond from the Impressed Bitumen Slabs of Ra's al-Junayz", in A. Parpola (ed), South Asian Archaeology 1993, Helsinki, 1995, pp. 745–761 (in collaboration with Serge Cleuziou)</ref>

Several coastal settlements like Sotkagen-dor (astride Dasht River, north of Jiwani), [[Sokhta Koh]] (astride Shadi River, north of [[Pasni City|Pasni]]), and Balakot (near Sonmiani) in Pakistan along with Lothal in western India, testify to their role as Harappan trading outposts. Shallow harbours located at the estuaries of rivers opening into the sea allowed brisk maritime trade with Mesopotamian cities.{{citation needed|date=May 2016}}


<blockquote>It is generally assumed that most trade between the Indus Valley (ancient Meluhha?) and western neighbors proceeded up the Persian Gulf rather than overland. Although there is no incontrovertible proof that this was indeed the case, the distribution of Indus-type artifacts on the Oman peninsula, on Bahrain and in southern Mesopotamia makes it plausible that a series of maritime stages linked the Indus Valley and the Gulf region.<ref>Daniel T. Potts (2009), [http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/maritime-trade-i-pre-islamic-period Maritime Trade: Pre-Islamic Period] iranicaonline.org</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>It is generally assumed that most trade between the Indus Valley (ancient Meluhha?) and western neighbors proceeded up the Persian Gulf rather than overland. Although there is no incontrovertible proof that this was indeed the case, the distribution of Indus-type artifacts on the Oman peninsula, on Bahrain and in southern Mesopotamia makes it plausible that a series of maritime stages linked the Indus Valley and the Gulf region.<ref>Daniel T. Potts (2009), [http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/maritime-trade-i-pre-islamic-period Maritime Trade: Pre-Islamic Period] iranicaonline.org</ref></blockquote>

Revision as of 01:04, 30 January 2019

Indus Valley Civilization
IVC major sites
Geographical rangeSouth Asia
PeriodBronze Age South Asia
Datesc. 3300 – c. 1300 BCE
Preceded byCeramic Neolithic
(Bhirrana
Kot Diji
Mehrgarh II–VI
Rakhigarhi)
Followed byPainted Grey Ware culture
Cemetery H culture
Jhukar culture
Rangpur culture
(all northern Indian subcontinent)
Dravidianization of southern India
Excavated ruins of Mohenjo-daro, Sindh province, Pakistan, showing the Great Bath in the foreground. Mohenjo-daro, on the right bank of the Indus River, is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, the first site in South Asia to be so declared.
Dholavira in Gujarat, India, is one of the largest cities of Indus Valley Civilisation, with stepwell steps to reach the water level in artificially constructed reservoirs.[1]

The Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) was a Bronze Age civilisation (3300–1300 BCE; mature period 2600–1600 BCE) mainly in the northwestern regions of South Asia, extending from what today is northeast Afghanistan to Pakistan and northwest India.[2] Along with ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia it was one of three early civilisations of the Old World, and of the three, the most widespread.[3][note 1] It flourished in the basins of the Indus River, which flows through the length of Pakistan, and along a system of perennial, mostly monsoon-fed, rivers that once coursed in the vicinity of the seasonal Ghaggar-Hakra river in northwest India and eastern Pakistan.[2][4][5] Aridification of this region during the 3rd millennium BCE may have been the initial spur for the urbanisation associated with the civilisation, but eventually also reduced the water supply enough to cause the civilisation's demise, and to scatter its population eastward.[6][7][5][8][note 2]

At its peak, the Indus Civilisation may have had a population of over five million.[9] Inhabitants of the ancient Indus river valley developed new techniques in handicraft (carnelian products, seal carving) and metallurgy (copper, bronze, lead, and tin). The Indus cities are noted for their urban planning, baked brick houses, elaborate drainage systems, water supply systems, and clusters of large non-residential buildings.[10]

The Indus Valley Civilisation is also known as the Harappan Civilisation, after Harappa, the first of its sites to be excavated in the 1920s, in what was then the Punjab province of British India, and now is Pakistan.[11] The discovery of Harappa, and soon afterwards, Mohenjo-Daro, was the culmination of work beginning in 1861 with the founding of the Archaeological Survey of India in the British Raj.[12] Excavation of Harappan sites has been ongoing since 1920, with important breakthroughs occurring as recently as 1999.[13] There were earlier and later cultures, often called Early Harappan and Late Harappan, in the same area as the Mature Harappan Civilisation. The Harappan civilisation is sometimes called the Mature Harappan' culture to distinguish it from these cultures. The early Harappan cultures were preceded by local Neolithic agricultural villages, from where the river plains were populated.[14][15] By 2002, over 1,000 Mature Harappan cities and settlements had been reported, of which just under a hundred had been excavated,[16][17][18][19] mainly in the general region of the Indus and Ghaggar-Hakra Rivers and their tributaries; however, there are only five major urban sites at the peak of the settlement hierarchy:[19] Harappa, Mohenjo-daro (UNESCO World Heritage Site), Dholavira, Ganeriwala in Cholistan and Rakhigarhi.[20]

The Harappan language is not directly attested, and its affiliation is uncertain since the Indus script is still undeciphered.[21] A relationship with the Dravidian or Elamo-Dravidian language family is favoured by a section of scholars.[22][23]

Name

The Indus Valley Civilisation was named after the Indus Valley, where the first remains were found. The Indus Valley Civilisation was also named as the Harappan civilisation after Harappa, the first of its sites to be excavated in the 1920s, in what was then the Punjab province of British India.[24]

The Indus Valley Civilisation has also been called by some the "Sarasvati culture", the "Sarasvati Civilisation", the "Indus-Sarasvati Civilisation" or the "Sindhu-Saraswati Civilisation", as the Ghaggar-Hakra river is identified by some with the mythological Sarasvati River,[25][26][27] suggesting that the Indus Valley Civilisation was the Vedic civilisation as perceived by traditional Hindu beliefs.[28][29][30][note 3]

Extent

Locations of IVC-sites
Diorama reconstruction of everyday life in Indus Valley Civilisation (National Science Centre, Delhi, India).

The Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) encompassed much of Pakistan, western India, and northeastern Afghanistan; extending from Pakistani Balochistan in the west to Uttar Pradesh in the east, northeastern Afghanistan in the north and Maharashtra in the south. The largest number of sites are in Gujarat, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir states in India,[25] and Sindh, Punjab, and Balochistan provinces in Pakistan.[25] Coastal settlements extended from Sutkagan Dor[33] in Western Baluchistan to Lothal[34] in Gujarat. An Indus Valley site has been found on the Oxus River at Shortugai in northern Afghanistan,[35] in the Gomal River valley in northwestern Pakistan,[36] at Manda, Jammu on the Beas River near Jammu,[37] India, and at Alamgirpur on the Hindon River, only 28 km from Delhi.[38] The southern most site of the Indus valley civilisation is Daimabad in Maharashtra. Indus Valley sites have been found most often on rivers, but also on the ancient seacoast,[39] for example, Balakot,[40] and on islands, for example, Dholavira.[41]

It flourished along the system of monsoon-fed perennial rivers in the basins of the Ghaggar-Hakra River in northwest India, and the Indus River flowing through the length of Pakistan.[42][4][5][note 4] There is evidence of dry river beds overlapping with the Ghaggar River in India and Hakra channel in Pakistan. Along the dried up river beds of the Ghaggar-Hakra River and its tributaries and the Indus River valley, 616 sites have been discovered in India,[25] while 406 sites have been found in Pakistan.[25]

Discovery and history of excavation

Indus Valley pottery, 2500–1900 BCE

The ruins of Harappa were described in 1842 by Charles Masson in his Narrative of Various Journeys in Balochistan, Afghanistan, and the Punjab, where locals talked of an ancient city extending "thirteen cosses" (about 25 miles or 41 km).[note 5]

Archaeological ruins at Mohenjo-daro, Sindh, Pakistan

In 1856, Alexander Cunningham, later director-general of the Archaeological Survey of Northern India, visited Harappa where the British engineers John and William Brunton were laying the East Indian Railway Company line connecting the cities of Karachi and Lahore. John wrote, "I was much exercised in my mind how we were to get ballast for the line of the railway". They were told of an ancient ruined city near the lines, called Harappa. Visiting the city, he found it full of hard well-burnt bricks, and, "convinced that there was a grand quarry for the ballast I wanted", the city of Harappa was reduced to ballast.[44] A few months later, further north, John's brother William Brunton's "section of the line ran near another ruined city, bricks from which had already been used by villagers in the nearby village of Harappa at the same site. These bricks now provided ballast along 93 miles (150 km) of the railroad track running from Karachi to Lahore".[44]

In 1872–75, Cunningham published the first Harappan seal (with an erroneous identification as Brahmi letters).[45] More Harappan seals were discovered in 1912 by John Faithfull Fleet, prompting an archaeological campaign under Sir John Hubert Marshall. Marshall, Rai Bahadur Daya Ram Sahni and Madho Sarup Vats began excavating Harappa in 1921, finding buildings and artefacts indicative of an ancient civilisation. These were soon complemented by discoveries at Mohenjo-daro by Rakhal Das Banerjee, Ernest J.H. Mackay, and Marshall. By 1931, much of Mohenjo-daro had been excavated, but excavations continued, such as that led by Sir Mortimer Wheeler, director of the Archaeological Survey of India in 1944. Among other archaeologists who worked on IVC sites before the independence in 1947 were Ahmad Hasan Dani, Brij Basi Lal, Nani Gopal Majumdar, and Sir Marc Aurel Stein.[46]

Following independence, the bulk of the archaeological finds were inherited by Pakistan where most of the IVC was based; but due to more recent discoveries, India now has 50% more sites than Pakistan. Outposts of the Indus Valley civilisation were excavated as far west as Sutkagan Dor in Pakistani Balochistan, as far north as at Shortugai on the Amu Darya (the river's ancient name was Oxus) in current Afghanistan, as far east as at Alamgirpur, Uttar Pradesh, India and as far south as at Malwan, in modern-day Surat, Gujarat, India.[25]

In 2010, heavy floods hit Haryana in India and damaged the archaeological site of Jognakhera, where ancient copper smelting furnaces were found dating back almost 5,000 years. The Indus Valley Civilisation site was hit by almost 10 feet of water as the Sutlej Yamuna link canal overflowed.[47]

Chronology

The cities of the Indus Valley Civilisation had "social hierarchies, their writing system, their large planned cities and their long-distance trade [which] mark them to archaeologists as a full-fledged 'civilisation.'"[48] The mature phase of the Harappan civilisation lasted from c. 2600 to 1900 BCE. With the inclusion of the predecessor and successor cultures – Early Harappan and Late Harappan, respectively – the entire Indus Valley Civilisation may be taken to have lasted from the 33rd to the 14th centuries BCE. It is part of the Indus Valley Tradition, which also includes the pre-Harappan occupation of Mehrgarh, the earliest farming site of the Indus Valley.[15][49]

Several periodisations are employed for the periodisation of the IVC.[15][49] The most commonly used classifies the Indus Valley Civilisation into Early, Mature and Late Harappan Phase.[50] An alternative approach by Shaffer divides the broader Indus Valley Tradition into four eras, the pre-Harappan "Early Food Producing Era," and the Regionalisation, Integration, and Localisation eras, which correspond roughly with the Early Harappan, Mature Harappan, and Late Harappan phases.[14][51]

Dates Main Phase Mehrgarh phases Harappan phases Post-Harappan phases Era
7000–5500 BCE Pre-Harappan Mehrgarh I
(aceramic Neolithic)
Early Food Producing Era
5500–3300 BCE Pre-Harappan/Early Harappan[52] Mehrgarh II–VI
(ceramic Neolithic)
Regionalisation Era
c. 4000–2500/2300 BCE (Shaffer)[53]
c. 5000–3200 BCE (Coningham & Young)[54]
3300–2800 BCE Early Harappan[52]
c. 3300–2800 BCE (Mughal)[55][52][56]
c. 5000–2800 BCE (Kenoyer)[52]
Harappan 1
(Ravi Phase; Hakra Ware)
2800–2600 BCE Mehrgarh VII Harappan 2
(Kot Diji Phase,
Nausharo I)
2600–2450 BCE Mature Harappan (Indus Valley Civilisation) Harappan 3A (Nausharo II) Integration Era
2450–2200 BCE Harappan 3B
2200–1900 BCE Harappan 3C
1900–1700 BCE Late Harappan Harappan 4 Cemetery H[57]
Ochre Coloured Pottery[57]
Localisation Era
1700–1300 BCE Harappan 5
1300–600 BCE Post-Harappan
Iron Age India
Painted Grey Ware (1200–600 BCE)
Vedic period (c. 1500–500 BCE)
Regionalisation
c. 1200–300 BCE (Kenoyer)[52]
c. 1500[58] – 600 BCE (Coningham & Young)[59]
600–300 BCE Northern Black Polished Ware (Iron Age)(700–200 BCE)
Second urbanisation (c. 500–200 BCE)
Integration[59]

Pre-Harappan era

Haplogroup L-M20 has a high frequency in the Indus Valley. McElreavy & Quintana-Murci (2005) note that "both the frequency distribution and estimated expansion time (~7,000 YBP) of this lineage suggest that its spread in the Indus Valley may be associated with the expansion of local farming groups during the Neolithic period."[60][note 6]

Bhirrana

According to Rao, the oldest layer of Bhirrana dates back to the 8th–7th millennium BCE, and contains Hakra Ware.[61][62][63] Hakra Ware culture is a material culture which is usually contemporaneous with the early Harappan Ravi phase culture (3300–2800 BCE) of the Indus Valley;[64][65] Bhirrana is the only site where Hakra Ware is said to be pre-Harappan.[66] According to Dikshit and Rami, the estimation for the antiquity of the Hakra Ware at Bhirrana as pre-Harappan is based on two calculations of charcoal samples, giving two dates of respectively 7570–7180 BCE, and 6689–6201 BCE.[61][62][note 7]

The earliest phase of Bhirrana concerns fourteen shallow dwelling-pits which "could accommodate about 3–4 people."[67] According to Dikshit, in the lowest level of these pits wheel-made Hakra Ware was found which was "not well finished,"[67] together with other wares.[68][note 7] According to the ASI, Bhirrana shows the full development of the Harappan culture, from pre-Harappan Hakra Ware to "a full-fledged Mature Harappan city."[66][69][note 8]

Mehrgarh

Mehrgarh is a Neolithic (7000 BCE to c. 2500 BCE) site to the west of the Indus River valley near the Bolan Pass,[70] which gave new insights on the emergence of the Indus Valley Civilization.[48][note 9] Mehrgarh is one of the earliest sites with evidence of farming and herding in South Asia.[71][72][note 7] Mehrgarh was influenced by the Near Eastern Neolithic,[80] with similarities between "domesticated wheat varieties, early phases of farming, pottery, other archaeological artefacts, some domesticated plants and herd animals."[81][note 10] According to Parpola, the culture migrated into the Indus Valley and became the Indus Valley Civilisation.[82]

Jean-Francois Jarrige argues for an independent origin of Mehrgarh. Jarrige notes "the assumption that farming economy was introduced full-fledged from Near-East to South Asia,"[83][note 10] and the similarities between Neolithic sites from eastern Mesopotamia and the western Indus valley, which are evidence of a "cultural continuum" between those sites. But given the originality of Mehrgarh, Jarrige concludes that Mehrgarh has an earlier local background," and is not a "'backwater' of the Neolithic culture of the Near East."[83]

Lukacs and Hemphill suggest an initial local development of Mehrgarh, with a continuity in cultural development but a change in population. According to Lukacs and Hemphill, while there is a strong continuity between the neolithic and chalcolithic (Copper Age) cultures of Mehrgarh, dental evidence shows that the chalcolithic population did not descend from the neolithic population of Mehrgarh,[99] which "suggests moderate levels of gene flow."[99][note 11] Mascarenhas et al. (2015) note that "new, possibly West Asian, body types are reported from the graves of Mehrgarh beginning in the Togau phase (3800 BCE)."[100] According to Narasimhan et al. (2018), the IVC-population likely resulted from a mixture of Iranian agriculturalists and South Asian hunter-gatherers, and came into being between c. 4700–3000 BCE.[101][note 12]

Gallego Romero et al. (2011) state that their research on lactose tolerance in India suggests that "the west Eurasian genetic contribution identified by Reich et al. (2009) principally reflects gene flow from Iran and the Middle East."[102] They further note that "[t]he earliest evidence of cattle herding in south Asia comes from the Indus River Valley site of Mehrgarh and is dated to 7,000 YBP."[102][note 13]

Early Harappan

Early Harappan Period, c. 3300–2600 BCE

The Early Harappan Ravi Phase, named after the nearby Ravi River, lasted from c. 3300 BCE until 2800 BCE. It is related to the Hakra Phase, identified in the Ghaggar-Hakra River Valley to the west, and predates the Kot Diji Phase (2800–2600 BCE, Harappan 2), named after a site in northern Sindh, Pakistan, near Mohenjo-daro. The earliest examples of the Indus script date to the 3rd millennium BCE.[104][105]

The mature phase of earlier village cultures is represented by Rehman Dheri and Amri in Pakistan.[106] Kot Diji represents the phase leading up to Mature Harappan, with the citadel representing centralised authority and an increasingly urban quality of life. Another town of this stage was found at Kalibangan in India on the Hakra River.[107]

Trade networks linked this culture with related regional cultures and distant sources of raw materials, including lapis lazuli and other materials for bead-making. By this time, villagers had domesticated numerous crops, including peas, sesame seeds, dates, and cotton, as well as animals, including the water buffalo. Early Harappan communities turned to large urban centres by 2600 BCE, from where the mature Harappan phase started. The latest research shows that Indus Valley people migrated from villages to cities.[108][109]

The final stages of the Early Harappan period are characterised by the building of large walled settlements, the expansion of trade networks, and the increasing integration of regional communities into a "relatively uniform" material culture in terms of pottery styles, ornaments, and stamp seals with Indus script, leading into the transition to the Mature Harappan phase.[110]

Mature Harappan

Mature Harappan Period, c. 2600–1900 BCE
Mohenjo-daro
View of Granary and Great Hall on Mound F in Harappa

According to Giosan et al. (2012), the slow southward migration of the monsoons across Asia initially allowed the Indus Valley villages to develop by taming the floods of the Indus and its tributaries. Flood-supported farming led to large agricultural surpluses, which in turn supported the development of cities. The IVC residents did not develop irrigation capabilities, relying mainly on the seasonal monsoons leading to summer floods.[5] Brooke further notes that the development of advanced cities coincides with a reduction in rainfall, which may have triggered a reorganisation into larger urban centers.[8][note 2]

According to J.G. Shaffer and D.A. Lichtenstein,[111] the Mature Harappan Civilisation was "a fusion of the Bagor, Hakra, and Kot Diji traditions or 'ethnic groups' in the Ghaggar-Hakra valley on the borders of India and Pakistan".[112]

By 2600 BCE, the Early Harappan communities turned into large urban centres. Such urban centres include Harappa, Ganeriwala, Mohenjo-daro in modern-day Pakistan, and Dholavira, Kalibangan, Rakhigarhi, Rupar, and Lothal in modern-day India.[113] In total, more than 1,000 cities and settlements have been found, mainly in the general region of the Indus and Ghaggar-Hakra Rivers and their tributaries.[16]

Cities

Computer-aided reconstruction of coastal Harappan settlement at Sokhta Koh near Pasni, Pakistan

A sophisticated and technologically advanced urban culture is evident in the Indus Valley Civilisation, making them the first urban centre in the region. The quality of municipal town planning suggests the knowledge of urban planning and efficient municipal governments which placed a high priority on hygiene, or, alternatively, accessibility to the means of religious ritual.[114]

As seen in Harappa, Mohenjo-daro and the recently partially excavated Rakhigarhi, this urban plan included the world's first known urban sanitation systems: see hydraulic engineering of the Indus Valley Civilisation. Within the city, individual homes or groups of homes obtained water from wells. From a room that appears to have been set aside for bathing, waste water was directed to covered drains, which lined the major streets. Houses opened only to inner courtyards and smaller lanes. The house-building in some villages in the region still resembles in some respects the house-building of the Harappans.[115]

The ancient Indus systems of sewerage and drainage that were developed and used in cities throughout the Indus region were far more advanced than any found in contemporary urban sites in the Middle East and even more efficient than those in many areas of Pakistan and India today. The advanced architecture of the Harappans is shown by their impressive dockyards, granaries, warehouses, brick platforms, and protective walls. The massive walls of Indus cities most likely protected the Harappans from floods and may have dissuaded military conflicts.[116]

So-called "Priest King" statue, Mohenjo-daro, late Mature Harappan period, National Museum, Karachi, Pakistan

The purpose of the citadel remains debated. In sharp contrast to this civilisation's contemporaries, Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt, no large monumental structures were built. There is no conclusive evidence of palaces or temples – or of kings, armies, or priests. Some structures are thought to have been granaries. Found at one city is an enormous well-built bath (the "Great Bath"), which may have been a public bath. Although the citadels were walled, it is far from clear that these structures were defensive.

Most city dwellers appear to have been traders or artisans, who lived with others pursuing the same occupation in well-defined neighbourhoods. Materials from distant regions were used in the cities for constructing seals, beads and other objects. Among the artefacts discovered were beautiful glazed faïence beads. Steatite seals have images of animals, people (perhaps gods), and other types of inscriptions, including the yet un-deciphered writing system of the Indus Valley Civilisation. Some of the seals were used to stamp clay on trade goods.

Although some houses were larger than others, Indus Civilisation cities were remarkable for their apparent, if relative, egalitarianism. All the houses had access to water and drainage facilities. This gives the impression of a society with relatively low wealth concentration, though clear social levelling is seen in personal adornments. [clarification needed]

Dholavira's sophisticated water reservoir, evidence for hydraulic sewage systems in the ancient Indus Valley Civilisation.

Toilets that used water were used in the Indus Valley Civilisation. The cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro had a flush toilet in almost every house, attached to a sophisticated sewage system.[117]

Authority and governance

Archaeological records provide no immediate answers for a centre of power or for depictions of people in power in Harappan society. But, there are indications of complex decisions being taken and implemented. For instance, the majority of the cities were constructed in a highly uniform and well-planned grid pattern, suggesting they were planned by a central authority; extraordinary uniformity of Harappan artefacts as evident in pottery, seals, weights and bricks; presence of public facilities and monumental architecture; heterogeneity in the mortuary symbolism and in grave goods (items included in burials).[citation needed]

These are the major theories:[citation needed]

  • There was a single state, given the similarity in artefacts, the evidence for planned settlements, the standardised ratio of brick size, and the establishment of settlements near sources of raw material.
  • There was no single ruler but several cities like Mohenjo-daro had a separate ruler, Harappa another, and so forth.
  • Harappan society had no rulers, and everybody enjoyed equal status.[118]

Technology

Unicorn seal of Indus Valley, Indian Museum.
Elephant seal of Indus Valley, Indian Museum.
Indus Valley seals at the British Museum.

The people of the Indus Civilisation achieved great accuracy in measuring length, mass, and time. They were among the first to develop a system of uniform weights and measures. A comparison of available objects indicates large scale variation across the Indus territories. Their smallest division, which is marked on an ivory scale found in Lothal in Gujarat, was approximately 1.704 mm, the smallest division ever recorded on a scale of the Bronze Age. Harappan engineers followed the decimal division of measurement for all practical purposes, including the measurement of mass as revealed by their hexahedron weights.[119]

These chert weights were in a ratio of 5:2:1 with weights of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 units, with each unit weighing approximately 28 grams, similar to the English Imperial ounce or Greek uncia, and smaller objects were weighed in similar ratios with the units of 0.871. However, as in other cultures, actual weights were not uniform throughout the area. The weights and measures later used in Kautilya's Arthashastra (4th century BCE) are the same as those used in Lothal.[120]

Harappans evolved some new techniques in metallurgy and produced copper, bronze, lead, and tin. The engineering skill of the Harappans was remarkable, especially in building docks.[121]

In 2001, archaeologists studying the remains of two men from Mehrgarh, Pakistan, discovered that the people of the Indus Valley Civilisation, from the early Harappan periods, had knowledge of proto-dentistry. Later, in April 2006, it was announced in the scientific journal Nature that the oldest (and first early Neolithic) evidence for the drilling of human teeth in vivo (i.e., in a living person) was found in Mehrgarh. Eleven drilled molar crowns from nine adults were discovered in a Neolithic graveyard in Mehrgarh that dates from 7,500–9,000 years ago. According to the authors, their discoveries point to a tradition of proto-dentistry in the early farming cultures of that region.[122]

A touchstone bearing gold streaks was found in Banawali, which was probably used for testing the purity of gold (such a technique is still used in some parts of India).[112]

Arts and crafts

Fragment of a large deep vessel; circa 2500 BC; red pottery with red and black slip-painted decoration; 12.5 x 15.5 cm (41516 x 618 in.) ; Brooklyn Museum (New York City)

Various sculptures, seals, bronze vessels pottery, gold jewellery, and anatomically detailed figurines in terracotta, bronze, and steatite have been found at excavation sites.[123] The Harappans also made various toys and games, among them cubical dice (with one to six holes on the faces), which were found in sites like Mohenjo-Daro.[124]

A number of gold, terracotta and stone figurines of girls in dancing poses reveal the presence of some dance form. These terracotta figurines included cows, bears, monkeys, and dogs. The animal depicted on a majority of seals at sites of the mature period has not been clearly identified. Part bull, part zebra, with a majestic horn, it has been a source of speculation. As yet, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate claims that the image had religious or cultic significance, but the prevalence of the image raises the question of whether or not the animals in images of the IVC are religious symbols.[125]

Many crafts including, "shell working, ceramics, and agate and glazed steatite bead making" were practised and the pieces were used in the making of necklaces, bangles, and other ornaments from all phases of Harappan culture. Some of these crafts are still practised in the subcontinent today.[126] Some make-up and toiletry items (a special kind of combs (kakai), the use of collyrium and a special three-in-one toiletry gadget) that were found in Harappan contexts still have similar counterparts in modern India.[127] Terracotta female figurines were found (c. 2800–2600 BCE) which had red colour applied to the "manga" (line of partition of the hair).[127]

The Dancing Girl

The Dancing Girl; 2400–1900 BC; bronze; height: 10.8 cm (414 in.); National Museum (New Delhi, India)

Sir John Marshall reacted with surprise when he saw the famous Indus bronze statuette of a slender-limbed dancing girl in Mohenjo-daro:

When I first saw them I found it difficult to believe that they were prehistoric; they seemed to completely upset all established ideas about early art, and culture. Modeling such as this was unknown in the ancient world up to the Hellenistic age of Greece, and I thought, therefore, that some mistake must surely have been made; that these figures had found their way into levels some 3000 years older than those to which they properly belonged .... Now, in these statuettes, it is just this anatomical truth which is so startling; that makes us wonder whether, in this all-important matter, Greek artistry could possibly have been anticipated by the sculptors of a far-off age on the banks of the Indus.[128]

Seals

The Pashupati seal; circa 1400-1900 BC; steatite; height: 3.6 cm (112 in.); National Museum (New Delhi, India)
Stamp seals, some of them with Indus script; probably made of steatite; British Museum (London)

Thousands of steatite seals have been recovered, and their physical character is fairly consistent. In size they range from 34 inch to 112 inches square. In most cases they have a pierced boss at the back to accommodate a cord for handling or for use as personal adornment.

Seals have been found at Mohenjo-daro depicting a figure standing on its head, and another sitting cross-legged in what some call a yoga-like pose (see image, the so-called Pashupati, below).[citation needed] This figure, sometimes known as a Pashupati, has been variously identified. Sir John Marshall identified a resemblance to the Hindu god, Shiva.[129]

A harp-like instrument depicted on an Indus seal and two shell objects found at Lothal indicate the use of stringed musical instruments.

Trade and transportation

The docks of ancient Lothal as they are today (2006)

The Indus civilisation's economy appears to have depended significantly on trade, which was facilitated by major advances in transport technology. The IVC may have been the first civilisation to use wheeled transport.[130] These advances may have included bullock carts that are identical to those seen throughout South Asia today, as well as boats. Most of these boats were probably small, flat-bottomed craft, perhaps driven by sail, similar to those one can see on the Indus River today; however, there is secondary evidence of sea-going craft. Archaeologists have discovered a massive, dredged canal and what they regard as a docking facility at the coastal city of Lothal in western India (Gujarat state). An extensive canal network, used for irrigation, has however also been discovered by H.-P. Francfort.[131]

During 4300–3200 BCE of the chalcolithic period (copper age), the Indus Valley Civilisation area shows ceramic similarities with southern Turkmenistan and northern Iran which suggest considerable mobility and trade. During the Early Harappan period (about 3200–2600 BCE), similarities in pottery, seals, figurines, ornaments, etc. document intensive caravan trade with Central Asia and the Iranian plateau.[132]

Judging from the dispersal of Indus civilisation artefacts, the trade networks economically integrated a huge area, including portions of Afghanistan, the coastal regions of Persia, northern and western India, and Mesopotamia. Studies of tooth enamel from individuals buried at Harappa suggest that some residents had migrated to the city from beyond the Indus Valley.[133] There is some evidence that trade contacts extended to Crete and possibly to Egypt.[134]

There was an extensive maritime trade network operating between the Harappan and Mesopotamian civilisations as early as the middle Harappan Phase, with much commerce being handled by "middlemen merchants from Dilmun" (modern Bahrain and Failaka located in the Persian Gulf).[135] Such long-distance sea trade became feasible with the development of plank-built watercraft, equipped with a single central mast supporting a sail of woven rushes or cloth.[136]

It is generally assumed that most trade between the Indus Valley (ancient Meluhha?) and western neighbors proceeded up the Persian Gulf rather than overland. Although there is no incontrovertible proof that this was indeed the case, the distribution of Indus-type artifacts on the Oman peninsula, on Bahrain and in southern Mesopotamia makes it plausible that a series of maritime stages linked the Indus Valley and the Gulf region.[137]

In the 1980s, important archaeological discoveries were made at Ras al-Jinz (Oman), demonstrating maritime Indus Valley connections with the Arabian Peninsula.[136][138][139]

Agriculture

According to Gangal et al. (2014), there is strong archeological and geographical evidence that neolithic farming spread from the Near East into north-west India, but there is also "good evidence for the local domestication of barley and the zebu cattle at Mehrgarh."[80][note 14]

According to Jean-Francois Jarrige, farming had an independent origin at Mehrgarh, despite the similarities which he notes between Neolithic sites from eastern Mesopotamia and the western Indus valley, which are evidence of a "cultural continuum" between those sites. Nevertheless, Jarrige concludes that Mehrgarh has an earlier local background," and is not a "'backwater' of the Neolithic culture of the Near East."[83] Archaeologist Jim G. Shaffer writes that the Mehrgarh site "demonstrates that food production was an indigenous South Asian phenomenon" and that the data support interpretation of "the prehistoric urbanisation and complex social organisation in South Asia as based on indigenous, but not isolated, cultural developments".[140]

Jarrige notes that the people of Mehrgarh used domesticated wheats and barley,[141] while Shaffer and Liechtenstein note that the major cultivated cereal crop was naked six-row barley, a crop derived from two-row barley.[142] Gangal agrees that "Neolithic domesticated crops in Mehrgarh include more than 90% barley," noting that "there is good evidence for the local domestication of barley." Yet, Gangal also notes that the crop also included "a small amount of wheat," which "are suggested to be of Near-Eastern origin, as the modern distribution of wild varieties of wheat is limited to Northern Levant and Southern Turkey.[80][note 15]"

Zebu cattle in Pune, India
Indus Valley seals with a Zebu Bull, Elephant, and Rhinoceros, 2500–1900 BCE

The cattle that are often portrayed on Indus seals are humped Indian aurochs, which are similar to Zebu cattle. Zebu cattle is still common in India, and in Africa. It is different from the European cattle, and had been originally domesticated on the Indian subcontinent, probably in the Baluchistan region of Pakistan.[143][80][note 14]

Research by J. Bates et al. (2016) confirms that Indus populations were the earliest people to use complex multi-cropping strategies across both seasons, growing foods during summer (rice, millets and beans) and winter (wheat, barley and pulses), which required different watering regimes.[144] J. Bates et al. (2016) also found evidence for an entirely separate domestication process of rice in ancient South Asia, based around the wild species Oryza nivara. This led to the local development of a mix of "wetland" and "dryland" agriculture of local Oryza sativa indica rice agriculture, before the truly "wetland" rice Oryza sativa japonica arrived around 2000 BCE.[145]

Language

It has often been suggested that the bearers of the IVC corresponded to proto-Dravidians linguistically, the break-up of proto-Dravidian corresponding to the break-up of the Late Harappan culture.[146] Finnish Indologist Asko Parpola concludes that the uniformity of the Indus inscriptions precludes any possibility of widely different languages being used, and that an early form of Dravidian language must have been the language of the Indus people.[147] Today, the Dravidian language family is concentrated mostly in southern India and northern and eastern Sri Lanka, but pockets of it still remain throughout the rest of India and Pakistan (the Brahui language), which lends credence to the theory.

According to Heggarty and Renfrew, Dravidian languages may have spread into the Indian subcontinent with the spread of farming.[148] According to David McAlpin, the Dravidian languages were brought to India by immigration into India from Elam.[note 16] In earlier publications, Renfrew also stated that proto-Dravidian was brought to India by farmers from the Iranian part of the Fertile Crescent,[149][150][151][note 17] but more recently Heggarty and Renfrew note that "a great deal remains to be done in elucidating the prehistory of Dravidian." They also note that "McAlpin's analysis of the language data, and thus his claims, remain far from orthodoxy."[148] Heggarty and Renfrew conclude that several scenarios are compatible with the data, and that "the linguistic jury is still very much out."[148][note 19]

Possible writing system

Ten Indus characters from the northern gate of Dholavira, India, dubbed the Dholavira Signboard.

Between 400 and as many as 600 distinct Indus symbols[156] have been found on seals, small tablets, ceramic pots and more than a dozen other materials, including a "signboard" that apparently once hung over the gate of the inner citadel of the Indus city of Dholavira. Typical Indus inscriptions are no more than four or five characters in length, most of which (aside from the Dholavira "signboard") are tiny; the longest on a single surface, which is less than 1 inch (2.54 cm) square, is 17 signs long; the longest on any object (found on three different faces of a mass-produced object) has a length of 26 symbols.

While the Indus Valley Civilisation is generally characterised as a literate society on the evidence of these inscriptions, this description has been challenged by Farmer, Sproat, and Witzel (2004)[157] who argue that the Indus system did not encode language, but was instead similar to a variety of non-linguistic sign systems used extensively in the Near East and other societies, to symbolise families, clans, gods, and religious concepts. Others have claimed on occasion that the symbols were exclusively used for economic transactions, but this claim leaves unexplained the appearance of Indus symbols on many ritual objects, many of which were mass-produced in moulds. No parallels to these mass-produced inscriptions are known in any other early ancient civilisations.[158]

In a 2009 study by P.N. Rao et al. published in Science, computer scientists, comparing the pattern of symbols to various linguistic scripts and non-linguistic systems, including DNA and a computer programming language, found that the Indus script's pattern is closer to that of spoken words, supporting the hypothesis that it codes for an as-yet-unknown language.[159][160]

Farmer, Sproat, and Witzel have disputed this finding, pointing out that Rao et al. did not actually compare the Indus signs with "real-world non-linguistic systems" but rather with "two wholly artificial systems invented by the authors, one consisting of 200,000 randomly ordered signs and another of 200,000 fully ordered signs, that they spuriously claim represent the structures of all real-world non-linguistic sign systems".[161] Farmer et al. have also demonstrated that a comparison of a non-linguistic system like medieval heraldic signs with natural languages yields results similar to those that Rao et al. obtained with Indus signs. They conclude that the method used by Rao et al. cannot distinguish linguistic systems from non-linguistic ones.[162]

The messages on the seals have proved to be too short to be decoded by a computer. Each seal has a distinctive combination of symbols and there are too few examples of each sequence to provide a sufficient context. The symbols that accompany the images vary from seal to seal, making it impossible to derive a meaning for the symbols from the images. There have, nonetheless, been a number of interpretations offered for the meaning of the seals. These interpretations have been marked by ambiguity and subjectivity.[162]: 69 

Photos of many of the thousands of extant inscriptions are published in the Corpus of Indus Seals and Inscriptions (1987, 1991, 2010), edited by Asko Parpola and his colleagues. The most recent volume republished photos taken in the 1920s and 1930s of hundreds of lost or stolen inscriptions, along with many discovered in the last few decades; formerly, researchers had to supplement the materials in the Corpus by study of the tiny photos in the excavation reports of Marshall (1931), MacKay (1938, 1943), Wheeler (1947), or reproductions in more recent scattered sources.

Edakkal Caves in Wayanad district of Kerala contain drawings that range over periods from as early as 5000 BCE to 1000 BCE. The youngest group of paintings have been in the news for a possible connection to the Indus Valley Civilisation.[163]

Religion

Female figure, possibly a fertility goddess, Harappan Phase, 2500–1900 BCE
The Pashupati seal, showing a seated and possibly tricephalic figure, surrounded by animals

The religion and belief system of the Indus Valley people have received considerable attention, especially from the view of identifying precursors to deities and religious practices of Indian religions that later developed in the area. However, due to the sparsity of evidence, which is open to varying interpretations, and the fact that the Indus script remains undeciphered, the conclusions are partly speculative and largely based on a retrospective view from a much later Hindu perspective.[164][165]

An early and influential work in the area that set the trend for Hindu interpretations of archaeological evidence from the Harappan sites[166] was that of John Marshall, who in 1931 identified the following as prominent features of the Indus religion: a Great Male God and a Mother Goddess; deification or veneration of animals and plants; symbolic representation of the phallus (linga) and vulva (yoni); and, use of baths and water in religious practice. Marshall's interpretations have been much debated, and sometimes disputed over the following decades.[167][168]

Swastika seals of Indus Valley Civilisation in British Museum

One Indus Valley seal shows a seated figure with a horned headdress, possibly tricephalic and possibly ithyphallic, surrounded by animals. Marshall identified the figure as an early form of the Hindu god Shiva (or Rudra), who is associated with asceticism, yoga, and linga; regarded as a lord of animals; and often depicted as having three eyes. The seal has hence come to be known as the Pashupati Seal, after Pashupati (lord of all animals), an epithet of Shiva.[167][169] While Marshall's work has earned some support, many critics and even supporters have raised several objections. Doris Srinivasan has argued that the figure does not have three faces, or yogic posture, and that in Vedic literature Rudra was not a protector of wild animals.[170][171] Herbert Sullivan and Alf Hiltebeitel also rejected Marshall's conclusions, with the former claiming that the figure was female, while the latter associated the figure with Mahisha, the Buffalo God and the surrounding animals with vahanas (vehicles) of deities for the four cardinal directions.[172][173] Writing in 2002, Gregory L. Possehl concluded that while it would be appropriate to recognise the figure as a deity, its association with the water buffalo, and its posture as one of ritual discipline, regarding it as a proto-Shiva would be going too far.[169] Despite the criticisms of Marshall's association of the seal with a proto-Shiva icon, it has been interpreted as the Tirthankara Rishabhanatha by Jains and Vilas Sangave[174] or an early Buddha by Buddhists.[166] Historians such as Heinrich Zimmer and Thomas McEvilley believe that there is a connection between first Jain Tirthankara Rishabhanatha and the Indus Valley civilisation.[175][176]

Marshall hypothesised the existence of a cult of Mother Goddess worship based upon excavation of several female figurines, and thought that this was a precursor of the Hindu sect of Shaktism. However the function of the female figurines in the life of Indus Valley people remains unclear, and Possehl does not regard the evidence for Marshall's hypothesis to be "terribly robust".[177] Some of the baetyls interpreted by Marshall to be sacred phallic representations are now thought to have been used as pestles or game counters instead, while the ring stones that were thought to symbolise yoni were determined to be architectural features used to stand pillars, although the possibility of their religious symbolism cannot be eliminated.[178] Many Indus Valley seals show animals, with some depicting them being carried in processions, while others show chimeric creations. One seal from Mohenjo-daro shows a half-human, half-buffalo monster attacking a tiger, which may be a reference to the Sumerian myth of such a monster created by goddess Aruru to fight Gilgamesh.[179]

In contrast to contemporary Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilisations, Indus Valley lacks any monumental palaces, even though excavated cities indicate that the society possessed the requisite engineering knowledge.[180][181] This may suggest that religious ceremonies, if any, may have been largely confined to individual homes, small temples, or the open air. Several sites have been proposed by Marshall and later scholars as possibly devoted to religious purpose, but at present only the Great Bath at Mohenjo-daro is widely thought to have been so used, as a place for ritual purification.[177][182] The funerary practices of the Harappan civilisation are marked by their diversity, with evidence of supine burial, fractional burial (in which the body is reduced to skeletal remains by exposure to the elements before final interment), and even cremation.[183][184]

Late Harappan

Late Harappan Period, c. 1900–1300 BCE
Late Harappan figures from a hoard at Daimabad, 2000 BCE

Around 1900 BCE signs of a gradual decline began to emerge, and by around 1700 BCE most of the cities had been abandoned. Recent examination of human skeletons from the site of Harappa has demonstrated that the end of the Indus civilisation saw an increase in inter-personal violence and in infectious diseases like leprosy and tuberculosis.[185][186]

According to historian Upinder Singh, "the general picture presented by the late Harappan phase is one of a breakdown of urban networks and an expansion of rural ones."[187]

During the period of approximately 1900 to 1700 BCE, multiple regional cultures emerged within the area of the Indus civilisation. The Cemetery H culture was in Punjab, Haryana, and Western Uttar Pradesh, the Jhukar culture was in Sindh, and the Rangpur culture (characterised by Lustrous Red Ware pottery) was in Gujarat.[188][189][190] Other sites associated with the Late phase of the Harappan culture are Pirak in Balochistan, Pakistan, and Daimabad in Maharashtra, India.[110]

The largest Late Harappan sites are Kudwala in Cholistan, Bet Dwarka in Gujarat, and Daimabad in Maharashtra, which can be considered as urban, but they are smaller and few in number compared with the Mature Harappan cities. Bet Dwarka was fortified and continued to have contacts with the Persian Gulf region, but there was a general decrease of long-distance trade.[191] On the other hand, the period also saw a diversification of the agricultural base, with a diversity of crops and the advent of double-cropping, as well as a shift of rural settlement towards the east and the south.[192]

The pottery of the Late Harappan period is described as "showing some continuity with mature Harappan pottery traditions," but also distinctive differences.[193] Many sites continued to be occupied for some centuries, although their urban features declined and disappeared. Formerly typical artifacts such as stone weights and female figurines became rare. There are some circular stamp seals with geometric designs, but lacking the Indus script which characterised the mature phase of the civilisation. Script is rare and confined to potsherd inscriptions.[193] There was also a decline in long-distance trade, although the local cultures show new innovations in faience and glass making, and carving of stone beads.[194] Urban amenities such as drains and the public bath were no longer maintained, and newer buildings were "poorly constructed". Stone sculptures were deliberately vandalised, valuables were sometimes concealed in hoards, suggesting unrest, and the corpses of animals and even humans were left unburied in the streets and in abandoned buildings.[195]

During the later half of the 2nd millennium BCE, most of the post-urban Late Harappan settlements were abandoned altogether. Subsequent material culture was typically characterised by temporary occupation, "the campsites of a population which was nomadic and mainly pastoralist" and which used "crude handmade pottery."[196] However, there is greater continuity and overlap between Late Harappan and subsequent cultural phases at sites in Punjab, Haryana, and western Uttar Pradesh, primarily small rural settlements.[192][197]

"Aryan invasion"

In 1953 Sir Mortimer Wheeler proposed that the invasion of an Indo-European tribe from Central Asia, the "Aryans", caused the decline of the Indus Civilisation. As evidence, he cited a group of 37 skeletons found in various parts of Mohenjo-daro, and passages in the Vedas referring to battles and forts. However, scholars soon started to reject Wheeler's theory, since the skeletons belonged to a period after the city's abandonment and none were found near the citadel. Subsequent examinations of the skeletons by Kenneth Kennedy in 1994 showed that the marks on the skulls were caused by erosion, and not by violence.[198]

Painted pottery urns from Harappa (Cemetery H period)

In the Cemetery H culture (the late Harappan phase in the Punjab region), some of the designs painted on the funerary urns have been interpreted through the lens of Vedic literature: for instance, peacocks with hollow bodies and a small human form inside, which has been interpreted as the souls of the dead, and a hound that can be seen as the hound of Yama, the god of death.[199][200] This may indicate the introduction of new religious beliefs during this period, but the archaeological evidence does not support the hypothesis that the Cemetery H people were the destroyers of the Harappan cities.[201]

Climate change and drought

Suggested contributory causes for the localisation of the IVC include changes in the course of the river,[202] and climate change that is also signalled for the neighbouring areas of the Middle East.[203][204] As of 2016 many scholars believe that drought, and a decline in trade with Egypt and Mesopotamia, caused the collapse of the Indus Civilisation.[205] The climate change which caused the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilisation was possibly due to "an abrupt and critical mega-drought and cooling 4,200 years ago," which marks the onset of the Meghalayan Age, the present stage of the Holocene.[206]

The Ghaggar-Hakra system was rain-fed,[5][note 4][207][note 20][208][note 21] and water-supply depended on the monsoons. The Indus Valley climate grew significantly cooler and drier from about 1800 BCE, linked to a general weakening of the monsoon at that time.[5] The Indian monsoon declined and aridity increased, with the Ghaggar-Hakra retracting its reach towards the foothills of the Himalaya,[5][209][210] leading to erratic and less extensive floods that made inundation agriculture less sustainable.

Aridification reduced the water supply enough to cause the civilisation's demise, and to scatter its population eastward.[6][7][8][note 2] According to Giosan et al. (2012), the IVC residents did not develop irrigation capabilities, relying mainly on the seasonal monsoons leading to summer floods. As the monsoons kept shifting south, the floods grew too erratic for sustainable agricultural activities. The residents then migrated towards the Ganges basin in the east, where they established smaller villages and isolated farms. The small surplus produced in these small communities did not allow development of trade, and the cities died out.[211][212]

Earthquakes

There are archaeological evidences of major earthquakes at Dholavira in 2200 BCE as well as at Kalibangan in 2700 and 2900 BCE. Such succession of earthquakes, along with drought, may have contributed to decline of Ghaggar-Harka system. Sea level changes are also found at two possible seaport sites along the Makran coast which are now inland. Earthquakes may have contributed to decline of several sites by direct shaking damage, by sea level change or by change in water supply.[213][214][215]

Continuity

Archaeological excavations indicate that the decline of Harappa drove people eastward.[216] According to Possehl, after 1900 BCE the number of sites in today's India increased from 218 to 853. According to Andrew Lawler, "excavations along the Gangetic plain show that cities began to arise there starting about 1200 BCE, just a few centuries after Harappa was deserted and much earlier than once suspected."[205][note 22] According to Jim Shaffer there was a continuous series of cultural developments, just as in most areas of the world. These link "the so-called two major phases of urbanisation in South Asia".[218]

At sites such as Bhagwanpura (in Haryana), archaeological excavations have discovered an overlap between the final phase of Late Harappan pottery and the earliest phase of Painted Grey Ware pottery, the latter being associated with the Vedic Culture and dating from around 1200 BCE. This site provides evidence of multiple social groups occupying the same village but using different pottery and living in different types of houses: "over time the Late Harappan pottery was gradually replaced by Painted Grey ware pottery," and other cultural changes indicated by archaeology include the introduction of the horse, iron tools, and new religious practices.[110]

There is also a Harappan site called Rojdi in Rajkot district of Saurashtra. Its excavation started under an archaeological team from Gujarat State Department of Archaeology and the Museum of the University of Pennsylvania in 1982–83. In their report on archaeological excavations at Rojdi, Gregory Possehl and M.H. Raval write that although there are "obvious signs of cultural continuity" between the Harappan Civilisation and later South Asian cultures, many aspects of the Harappan "sociocultural system" and "integrated civilization" were "lost forever," while the Second Urbanisation of India (beginning with the Northern Black Polished Ware culture, c. 600 BCE) "lies well outside this sociocultural environment".[219]

Post-Harappan

Previously, scholars believed that the decline of the Harappan civilisation led to an interruption of urban life in the Indian subcontinent. However, the Indus Valley Civilisation did not disappear suddenly, and many elements of the Indus Civilisation appear in later cultures. The Cemetery H culture may be the manifestation of the Late Harappan over a large area in the region of Punjab, Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh, and the Ochre Coloured Pottery culture its successor. David Gordon White cites three other mainstream scholars who "have emphatically demonstrated" that Vedic religion derives partially from the Indus Valley Civilisations.[220]

As of 2016, archaeological data suggests that the material culture classified as Late Harappan may have persisted until at least c. 1000–900 BCE and was partially contemporaneous with the Painted Grey Ware culture.[218] Harvard archaeologist Richard Meadow points to the late Harappan settlement of Pirak, which thrived continuously from 1800 BCE to the time of the invasion of Alexander the Great in 325 BCE.[205]

In the aftermath of the Indus Civilisation's localisation, regional cultures emerged, to varying degrees showing the influence of the Indus Civilisation. In the formerly great city of Harappa, burials have been found that correspond to a regional culture called the Cemetery H culture. At the same time, the Ochre Coloured Pottery culture expanded from Rajasthan into the Gangetic Plain. The Cemetery H culture has the earliest evidence for cremation; a practice dominant in Hinduism today.

Historical context

Near East

The mature (Harappan) phase of the IVC is contemporary to the Early and Middle Bronze Age in the Ancient Near East, in particular the Old Elamite period, Early Dynastic to Ur III Mesopotamia, Prepalatial Minoan Crete and Old Kingdom to First Intermediate Period Egypt.

The IVC has been compared in particular with the civilisations of Elam (also in the context of the Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis) and with Minoan Crete (because of isolated cultural parallels such as the ubiquitous goddess worship and depictions of bull-leaping).[221] The IVC has been tentatively identified with the toponym Meluhha known from Sumerian records; the Sumerians called them Meluhhaites.[222]

Shahr-i-Sokhta, located in southeastern Iran shows trade route with Mesopotamia.[223][224] A number of seals with Indus script have been also found in Mesopotamian sites.[224][225][226]

Dasyu

After the discovery of the IVC in the 1920s, it was immediately associated with the indigenous Dasyu inimical to the Rigvedic tribes in numerous hymns of the Rigveda. Mortimer Wheeler interpreted the presence of many unburied corpses found in the top levels of Mohenjo-daro as the victims of a warlike conquest, and famously stated that "Indra stands accused" of the destruction of the IVC. The association of the IVC with the city-dwelling Dasyus remains alluring because the assumed timeframe of the first Indo-Aryan migration into India corresponds neatly with the period of decline of the IVC seen in the archaeological record. The discovery of the advanced, urban IVC however changed the 19th-century view of early Indo-Aryan migration as an "invasion" of an advanced culture at the expense of a "primitive" aboriginal population to a gradual acculturation of nomadic "barbarians" on an advanced urban civilisation, comparable to the Germanic migrations after the Fall of Rome, or the Kassite invasion of Babylonia. This move away from simplistic "invasionist" scenarios parallels similar developments in thinking about language transfer and population movement in general, such as in the case of the migration of the proto-Greek speakers into Greece, or the Indo-Europeanisation of Western Europe.

Munda

Proto-Munda (or Para-Munda) and a "lost phylum" (perhaps related or ancestral to the Nihali language)[227] have been proposed as other candidates for the language of the IVC. Michael Witzel suggests an underlying, prefixing language that is similar to Austroasiatic, notably Khasi; he argues that the Rigveda shows signs of this hypothetical Harappan influence in the earliest historic level, and Dravidian only in later levels, suggesting that speakers of Austroasiatic were the original inhabitants of Punjab and that the Indo-Aryans encountered speakers of Dravidian only in later times.[228]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Wright: "The Indus civilisation is one of three in the 'Ancient East' that, along with Mesopotamia and Pharaonic Egypt, was a cradle of early civilisation in the Old World (Childe 1950). Mesopotamia and Egypt were longer lived, but coexisted with Indus civilisation during its florescence between 2600 and 1900 B.C. Of the three, the Indus was the most expansive, extending from today's northeast Afghanistan to Pakistan and India."[3]
  2. ^ a b c Broke:[8] "The story in Harappan India was somewhat different (see Figure 111.3). The Bronze Age village and urban societies of the Indus Valley are some-thing of an anomaly, in that archaeologists have found little indication of local defense and regional warfare. It would seem that the bountiful monsoon rainfall of the Early to Mid-Holocene had forged a condition of plenty for all, and that competitive energies were channeled into commerce rather than conflict. Scholars have long argued that these rains shaped the origins of the urban Harappan societies, which emerged from Neolithic villages around 2600 BC. It now appears that this rainfall began to slowly taper off in the third millennium, at just the point that the Harappan cities began to develop. Thus it seems that this "first urbanisation" in South Asia was the initial response of the Indus Valley peoples to the beginning of Late Holocene aridification. These cities were maintained for 300 to 400 years and then gradually abandoned as the Harappan peoples resettled in scattered villages in the eastern range of their territories, into the Punjab and the Ganges Valley....'
    17 (footnote):
    a) Liviu Giosan et al., "Fluvial Landscapes of the Harappan Civilization," PNAS, 102 (2012), E1688–E1694;
    (b) Camilo Ponton, "Holocene Aridification of India," GRL 39 (2012), L03704;
    (c) Harunur Rashid et al., "Late Glacial to Holocene Indian Summer Monsoon Variability Based upon Sediment Records Taken from the Bay of Bengal," Terrestrial, Atmospheric, and Oceanic Sciences 22 (2011), 215–28;
    (d) Marco Madella and Dorian Q. Fuller, "Paleoecology and the Harappan Civilization of South Asia: A Reconsideration," Quaternary Science Reviews 25 (2006), 1283–301. Compare with the very different interpretations in Possehl, Gregory L. (2002), The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, Rowman Altamira, pp. 237–245, ISBN 978-0759101722, and Michael Staubwasser et al., "Climate Change at the 4.2 ka BP Termination of the Indus Valley Civilization and Holocene South Asian Monsoon Variability," GRL 30 (2003), 1425. Bar-Matthews and Avner Ayalon, "Mid-Holocene Climate Variations."
  3. ^ For example Michel Danino notes that an alternative dating of the Vedas to the third millennium BCE coincides with the mature phase of the Indus Valley civilisation,[31] and that it is "tempting" to equate the Indus Valley and Vedic cultures.[32] S.P. Gupta "argued that Vedic elements such as the horse, fire altars and animal sacrifices had existed at the socalled 'Indus-Sarasvati' culture sites."[29] These suggestions are rejected by mainstream scholarship.[28]
  4. ^ a b Giosan: "Numerous speculations have advanced the idea that the Ghaggar-Hakra fluvial system, at times identified with the lost mythical river of Sarasvati (e.g., 4, 5, 7, 19), was a large glacier fed Himalayan river. Potential sources for this river include the Yamuna River, the Sutlej River, or both rivers. However, the lack of large-scale incision on the interfluve demonstrates that large, glacier-fed rivers did not flow across the Ghaggar-Hakra region during the Holocene [...] The present Ghaggar-Hakra valley and its tributary rivers are currently dry or have seasonal flows. Yet rivers were undoubtedly active in this region during the Urban Harappan Phase. We recovered sandy fluvial deposits approximately 5,400 y old at Fort Abbas in Pakistan (SI Text), and recent work (33) on the upper Ghaggar-Hakra interfluve in India also documented Holocene channel sands that are approximately 4,300 y old. On the upper interfluve, fine-grained floodplain deposition continued until the end of the Late Harappan Phase, as recent as 2,900 y ago (33) (Fig. 2B). This widespread fluvial redistribution of sediment suggests that reliable monsoon rains were able to sustain perennial rivers earlier during the Holocene and explains why Harappan settlements flourished along the entire Ghaggar-Hakra system without access to a glacier-fed river."[5]
  5. ^ Masson: "A long march preceded our arrival at Haripah, through jangal of the closest description.... When I joined the camp I found it in front of the village and ruinous brick castle. Behind us was a large circular mound, or eminence, and to the west was an irregular rocky height, crowned with the remains of buildings, in fragments of walls, with niches, after the eastern manner.... Tradition affirms the existence here of a city, so considerable that it extended to Chicha Watni, thirteen cosses distant, and that it was destroyed by a particular visitation of Providence, brought down by the lust and crimes of the sovereign."[43] Note that the coss, a measure of distance used from Vedic period to Mughal times, is approximately 2 miles (3.2 km).
  6. ^ See also:* This map from Sahoo et al. (2006), A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: Evaluating demic diffusion scenarios
    * Sengupta et al. (2006), Polarity and Temporality of High-Resolution Y-Chromosome Distributions in India Identify Both Indigenous and Exogenous Expansions and Reveal Minor Genetic Influence of Central Asian Pastoralists
  7. ^ a b c Excavations at Bhirrana, Haryana, in India between 2006 and 2009, by archaeologist K.N. Dikshit, provided six artefacts, including "relatively advanced pottery," so-called Hakra ware, which were dated at a time bracket between 7380 and 6201 BCE.[73][74][75][76] These dates compete with Mehrgarh for being the oldest site for cultural remains in the area.[77]

    Yet, Dikshit and Mani clarify that this time-bracket concerns only charcoal samples, which were radio-carbon dated at respectively 7570–7180 BCE (sample 2481) and 6689–6201 BCE (sample 2333).[78][79] Dikshit further writes that the earliest phase concerns 14 shallow dwelling-pits which "could accommodate about 3–4 people."[67] According to Dikshit, in the lowest level of these pits wheel-made Hakra Ware was found which was "not well finished,"[67] together with other wares.[68]
  8. ^ ASI: "The excavation has revealed the remains of the Harappan culture right from its nascent stage, i.e., Hakra Wares Culture (antedating the earliest known Harappan culture in the Indian subcontinent, also known as Kalibangan-I) to a full-fledged Mature Harappan city. Prior to the excavation of Bhirrana, no Hakra Wares culture, predating the Early Harappan had been exposed in any Indian site. For the first time, the remains of this culture have been exposed at Bhirrana. This culture is characterised by structures in the form of subterranean dwelling pits, cut into the natural soil. The walls and floor of these pits were plastered with the yellowish alluvium of the Saraswati valley. The artefacts of this period comprised a copper bangle, a copper arrowhead, bangles of terracotta, beads of carnelian, lapis lazuli and steatite, bone point, stone saddle and quern. The pottery repertoire is very rich and the diagnostic wares of this period included Mud Applique Wares, Incised (Deep and Light), Tan/Chocolate Slipped Wares, Brown-on-Buff Wares, Bichrome Wares (Paintings on the exterior with black and white pigments), Black-on-Red Ware and Plain Red Wares."[66]
  9. ^ According to Ahmad Hasan Dani, professor emeritus at Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, the discovery of Mehrgarh "changed the entire concept of the Indus civilisation […] There we have the whole sequence, right from the beginning of settled village life."[48]
  10. ^ a b According to Gangal et al. (2014), there is strong archeological and geographical evidence that neolithic farming spread from the Near East into north-west India.[80][84] Gangal et al. (2014):[80] "There are several lines of evidence that support the idea of connection between the Neolithic in the Near East and in the Indian subcontinent. The prehistoric site of Mehrgarh in Baluchistan (modern Pakistan) is the earliest Neolithic site in the north-west Indian subcontinent, dated as early as 8500 BCE.[18][85]

    Neolithic domesticated crops in Mehrgarh include more than 90% barley and a small amount of wheat. There is good evidence for the local domestication of barley and the zebu cattle at Mehrgarh [19],[86] [20],[87] but the wheat varieties are suggested to be of Near-Eastern origin, as the modern distribution of wild varieties of wheat is limited to Northern Levant and Southern Turkey [21].[88] A detailed satellite map study of a few archaeological sites in the Baluchistan and Khybar Pakhtunkhwa regions also suggests similarities in early phases of farming with sites in Western Asia [22].[89] Pottery prepared by sequential slab construction, circular fire pits filled with burnt pebbles, and large granaries are common to both Mehrgarh and many Mesopotamian sites [23].[90] The postures of the skeletal remains in graves at Mehrgarh bear strong resemblance to those at Ali Kosh in the Zagros Mountains of southern Iran [19].[86] Clay figurines found in Mehrgarh resemble those discovered at Teppe Zagheh on the Qazvin plain south of the Elburz range in Iran (the 7th millennium BCE) and Jeitun in Turkmenistan (the 6th millennium BCE) [24].[91] Strong arguments have been made for the Near-Eastern origin of some domesticated plants and herd animals at Jeitun in Turkmenistan (pp. 225–227 in [25]).[92]

    The Near East is separated from the Indus Valley by the arid plateaus, ridges and deserts of Iran and Afghanistan, where rainfall agriculture is possible only in the foothills and cul-de-sac valleys [26].[93] Nevertheless, this area was not an insurmountable obstacle for the dispersal of the Neolithic. The route south of the Caspian sea is a part of the Silk Road, some sections of which were in use from at least 3,000 BCE, connecting Badakhshan (north-eastern Afghanistan and south-eastern Tajikistan) with Western Asia, Egypt and India [27].[94] Similarly, the section from Badakhshan to the Mesopotamian plains (the Great Khorasan Road) was apparently functioning by 4,000 BCE and numerous prehistoric sites are located along it, whose assemblages are dominated by the Cheshmeh-Ali (Tehran Plain) ceramic technology, forms and designs [26].[93] Striking similarities in figurines and pottery styles, and mud-brick shapes, between widely separated early Neolithic sites in the Zagros Mountains of north-western Iran (Jarmo and Sarab), the Deh Luran Plain in southwestern Iran (Tappeh Ali Kosh and Chogha Sefid), Susiana (Chogha Bonut and Chogha Mish), the Iranian Central Plateau (Tappeh-Sang-e Chakhmaq), and Turkmenistan (Jeitun) suggest a common incipient culture [28].[95] The Neolithic dispersal across South Asia plausibly involved migration of the population ([29][96] and [25], pp. 231–233).[92] This possibility is also supported by Y-chromosome and mtDNA analyses [30],[97] [31]."[98]
  11. ^ They further noted that "the direct lineal descendents of the Neolithic inhabitants of Mehrgarh are to be found to the south and the east of Mehrgarh, in northwestern India and the western edge of the Deccan plateau," with neolithic Mehrgarh showing greater affinity with chalocolithic Inamgaon, south of Mehrgarh, than with chalcolithic Mehrgarh.[99]
  12. ^ See also Tony Joseph, How We, The Indians, Came To Be, the quint
  13. ^ Gallego romero et al. (2011) refer to (Meadow 1993):[102] Meadow RH. 1993. Animal domestication in the Middle East: a revised view from the eastern margin. In: Possehl G, editor. Harappan civilization. New Delhi (India): Oxford University Press and India Book House. p 295–320.[103]
  14. ^ a b Gangal refers to Jarrige JF (2008), Mehrgarh Neolithic. Pragdhara 18: 136–154; and to Costantini L (2008), The first farmers in Western Pakistan: the evidence of the Neolithic agropastoral settlement of Mehrgarh. Pragdhara 18: 167–178
  15. ^ Gangal refers to Fuller DQ (2006), Agricultural origins and frontiers in South Asia: a working synthesis. J World Prehistory 20: 1–86
  16. ^ See:
    • David McAlpin, "Toward Proto-Elamo-Dravidian", Language vol. 50 no. 1 (1974);
    • David McAlpin: "Elamite and Dravidian, Further Evidence of Relationships", Current Anthropology vol. 16 no. 1 (1975);
    • David McAlpin: "Linguistic prehistory: the Dravidian situation", in Madhav M. Deshpande and Peter Edwin Hook: Aryan and Non-Aryan in India, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1979);
    • David McAlpin, "Proto-Elamo-Dravidian: The Evidence and its Implications", Transactions of the American Philosophical Society vol. 71 pt. 3, (1981)
  17. ^ See also:
    • Mukherjee (2001): "More recently, about 15,000–10,000 years before present (ybp), when agriculture developed in the Fertile Crescent region that extends from Israel through northern Syria to western Iran, there was another eastward wave of human migration (Cavalli-Sforza et al., 1994; Renfrew 1987), a part of which also appears to have entered India. This wave has been postulated to have brought the Dravidian languages into India (Renfrew 1987). Subsequently, the Indo-European (Aryan) language family was introduced into India about 4,000 ybp."[150]
    • Derenko: "The spread of these new technologies has been associated with the dispersal of Dravidian and Indo-European languages in southern Asia. It is hypothesized that the proto-Elamo-Dravidian language, most likely originated in the Elam province in southwestern Iran, spread eastwards with the movement of farmers to the Indus Valley and the Indian sub-continent."[151]

      Derenko refers to:
      * Renfrew (1987), Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins
      * Renfrew (1996), Language families and the spread of farming. In: Harris DR, editor, The origins and spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia, pp. 70–92
      * Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi, Piazza (1994), The History and Geography of Human Genes.
  18. ^ Kumar: "The analysis of two Y chromosome variants, Hgr9 and Hgr3 provides interesting data (Quintan-Murci et al., 2001). Microsatellite variation of Hgr9 among Iranians, Pakistanis and Indians indicate an expansion of populations to around 9000 YBP in Iran and then to 6,000 YBP in India. This migration originated in what was historically termed Elam in south-west Iran to the Indus valley, and may have been associated with the spread of Dravidian languages from south-west Iran (Quintan-Murci et al., 2001)."[154]
  19. ^ Nevertheless, Kivisild et al. (1999) note that "a small fraction of the West Eurasian mtDNA lineages found in Indian populations can be ascribed to a relatively recent admixture."[152] at c. 9,300 ± 3,000 years before present,[153] which coincides with "the arrival to India of cereals domesticated in the Fertile Crescent" and "lends credence to the suggested linguistic connection between the Elamite and Dravidic populations."[153] According to Kumar (2004), referring to Quintan-Murci et al. (2001), "microsatellite variation of Hgr9 among Iranians, Pakistanis and Indians indicate an expansion of populations to around 9000 YBP in Iran and then to 6,000 YBP in India. This migration originated in what was historically termed Elam in south-west Iran to the Indus valley, and may have been associated with the spread of Dravidian languages from south-west Iran."[154][note 18] According to Palanichamy et al. (2015), "The presence of mtDNA haplogroups (HV14 and U1a) and Y-chromosome haplogroup (L1) in Dravidian populations indicates the spread of the Dravidian language into India from west Asia."[155]
  20. ^ Geological research by a group led by Peter Clift investigated how the courses of rivers have changed in this region since 8000 years ago, to test whether climate or river reorganisations caused the decline of the Harappan. Using U-Pb dating of zircon sand grains they found that sediments typical of the Beas, Sutlej and Yamuna rivers (Himalayan tributaries of the Indus) are actually present in former Ghaggar-Hakra channels. However, sediment contributions from these glacial-fed rivers stopped at least by 10,000 years ago, well before the development of the Indus civilisation.[207]
  21. ^ Tripathi et al. (2004) found that the isotopes of sediments carried by the Ghaggar-Hakra system over the last 20 thousand years do not come from the glaciated Higher Himalaya but have a sub-Himalayan source, and concluded that the river system was rain-fed. They also concluded that this contradicted the idea of a Harappan-time mighty "Sarasvati" river.[208]
  22. ^ Most sites of the Painted Grey Ware culture in the Ghaggar-Hakra and Upper Ganges Plain were small farming villages. However, "several dozen" PGW sites eventually emerged as relatively large settlements that can be characterized as towns, the largest of which were fortified by ditches or moats and embankments made of piled earth with wooden palisades, albeit smaller and simpler than the elaborately fortified large cities which grew after 600 BCE in the more fully urban Northern Black Polished Ware culture.[217]

Citations

  1. ^ Takezawa, Suichi. "Stepwells – Cosmology of Subterranean Architecture as seen in Adalaj" (pdf). The Diverse Architectural World of The Indian Sub-Continent. Retrieved 18 November 2009.
  2. ^ a b Wright 2009, p. 1.
  3. ^ a b Wright 2009.
  4. ^ a b Maemoku, Hideaki; Shitaoka, Yorinao; Nagatomo, Tsuneto; Yagi, Hiroshi (2013), "Geomorphological Constraints on the Ghaggar River Regime During the Mature Harappan Period", in Giosan, Liviu; Fuller, Dorian Q.; Nicoll, Kathleen (eds.), Climates, Landscapes, and Civilizations, American Geophysical Union Monograph Series 198, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1118704431{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Giosan, L.; et al. (2012). "Fluvial landscapes of the Harappan Civilization". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (26): E1688–E1694. Bibcode:2012PNAS..109E1688G. doi:10.1073/pnas.1112743109. PMC 3387054. PMID 22645375.
  6. ^ a b Madella, Marco; Fuller, Dorian (2006). "Palaeoecology and the Harappan Civilisation of South Asia: a reconsideration". Quaternary Science Reviews. 25 (11–12): 1283–1301. Bibcode:2006QSRv...25.1283M. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.012.
  7. ^ a b MacDonald, Glen (2011). "Potential influence of the Pacific Ocean on the Indian summer monsoon and Harappan decline". Quaternary International. 229 (1–2): 140–148. Bibcode:2011QuInt.229..140M. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.012.
  8. ^ a b c d Brooke, John L. (2014), Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough Journey, Cambridge University Press, p. 296, ISBN 978-0521871648
  9. ^ McIntosh, Jane (2008), The Ancient Indus Valley: New Perspectives, ABC-CLIO, p. 387, ISBN 978-1-57607-907-2
  10. ^ Wright 2009, pp. 115–125.
  11. ^ Beck, Roger B.; Linda Black; Larry S. Krieger; Phillip C. Naylor; Dahia Ibo Shabaka (1999). World History: Patterns of Interaction. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell. ISBN 0-395-87274-X.
  12. ^ Wright 2010, p. 2.
  13. ^ "'Earliest writing' found". BBC News. 4 May 1999. Retrieved 5 January 2010.
  14. ^ a b Shaffer 1992, I:441–464, II:425–446.
  15. ^ a b c Kenoyer 1991.
  16. ^ a b Possehl, Gregory L. (2002), "Harappans and hunters: economic interaction and specialization in prehistoric India", in Morrison, Kathleen D.; Junker, Laura L. (eds.), Forager-Traders in South and Southeast Asia: Long-Term Histories, Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–76, ISBN 978-0-521-01636-0 Quote: "There are 1,056 Mature Harappan sites that have been reported of which 96 have been excavated."
  17. ^ Possehl 2002, p. 20. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFPossehl2002 (help)
  18. ^ Singh, Upinder (2008), A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century, Pearson Education India, p. 137, ISBN 978-81-317-1120-0 Quote " Today, the count of Harappan sites has risen to about 1,022, of which 406 are in Pakistan and 616 in India. Of these, only 97 have so far been excavated."
  19. ^ a b Coningham, Robin; Young, Ruth (2015), The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE, Cambridge University Press, p. 192, ISBN 978-1-316-41898-7 Quote: "More than 1,000 settlements belonging to the Integrated Era have been identified (Singh 2008: 137), but there are only five significant urban sites at the peak of the settlement hierarchy (Smith 2.006a: 110) (Figure 6.2).These are Mohenjo-daro in the lower Indus plain, Harappa in the western Punjab, Ganweriwala in Cholistan, Dholavira in western Gujarat and Rakhigarhi in Haryana. Mohenjo-daro covered an area of more than 250 hectares, Harappa exceeded 150 hectares, Dholavira 100 hectares and Ganweriwala and Rakhigarhi around 80 hectares each."
  20. ^ Wright 2009, p. 107: Quote: "Five major Indus cities are discussed in this chapter. During the Urban period, the early town of Harappa expanded in size and population and became a major center in the Upper Indus. Other cities emerging during the Urban period include Mohenjo-daro in the Lower Indus, Dholavira to the south on the western edge of peninsular India in Kutch, Ganweriwala in Cholistan, and a fifth city, Rakhigarhi, on the Ghaggar-Hakra. Rakhigarhi will be discussed briefly in view of the limited published material."
  21. ^ "We Are All Harappans Outlook India".
  22. ^ Ratnagar, Shereen (2006). Trading Encounters: From the Euphrates to the Indus in the Bronze Age (2nd ed.). India: Oxford University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0195666038.
  23. ^ Lockard, Craig (2010). Societies, Networks, and Transitions, Volume 1: To 1500 (2nd ed.). India: Cengage Learning. p. 40. ISBN 978-1439085356.
  24. ^ Cite error: The named reference Beck 1999 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  25. ^ a b c d e f Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early medieval India : from the Stone Age to the 12th century. New Delhi: Pearson Education. p. 137. ISBN 978-8131711200.
  26. ^ Charles Keith Maisels (2003). "The Indus/'Harappan'/Sarasvati Civilization". Early Civilizations of the Old World: The Formative Histories of Egypt, The Levant, Mesopotamia, India and China. Routledge. p. 184. ISBN 978-1134837311.
  27. ^ Denise Cush; Catherine A. Robinson; Michael York (2008). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Psychology Press. p. 766. ISBN 978-0700712670.
  28. ^ a b Mukherjee 2001b.
  29. ^ a b Habib 2002, p. 44.
  30. ^ Danino 2010.
  31. ^ Danino 2010, p. 256.
  32. ^ Danino 2010, p. 258.
  33. ^ Dales, George F. (1962). "Harappan Outposts on the Makran Coast". Antiquity. 36 (142): 86.
  34. ^ Rao, Shikaripura Ranganatha (1973). Lothal and the Indus civilization. London: Asia Publishing House. ISBN 978-0210222782.
  35. ^ Kenoyer 1998, p. 96
  36. ^ Dani, Ahmad Hassan (1970–1971). "Excavations in the Gomal Valley". Ancient Pakistan (5): 1–177.
  37. ^ Joshi, J.P.; Bala, M. (1982). "Manda: A Harappan site in Jammu and Kashmir". In Possehl Gregory L. (ed.). Harappan Civilization: A recent perspective. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 185–195.
  38. ^ A. Ghosh (ed.). "Excavations at Alamgirpur". Indian Archaeology, A Review (1958–1959). Delhi: Archaeol. Surv. India. pp. 51–52.
  39. ^ Ray, Himanshu Prabha (2003). The Archaeology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0521011099.
  40. ^ Dales, George F. (1979). "The Balakot Project: summary of four years excavations in Pakistan". In Maurizio Taddei (ed.). South Asian Archaeology 1977. Naples: Seminario di Studi Asiatici Series Minor 6. Instituto Universitario Orientate. pp. 241–274.
  41. ^ Bisht, R.S. (1989). "A new model of the Harappan town planning as revealed at Dholavira in Kutch: a surface study of its plan and architecture". In Chatterjee Bhaskar (ed.). History and Archaeology. New Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan. pp. 379–408. ISBN 978-8185205465.
  42. ^ Wright 2010, p. 1.
  43. ^ Masson 1842.
  44. ^ a b Davreau, Robert (1976). "Indus Valley". In Reader's Digest (ed.). World's Last Mysteries.
  45. ^ Alexander Cunningham (1875). Archaeological Survey of India, Report for the Year 1872–73 (Vol. 5): 105–8 and pl. 32-3. Calcutta: Archaeological Survey of India.
  46. ^ IJSI (2016). International Journal of Social Impact, Volume 1, Issue 2. ISBN 978-1365034152.
  47. ^ Sabharwal, vijay (11 July 2010). "Indus Valley site ravaged by floods". The Times of India.
  48. ^ a b c Chandler, Graham (September–October 1999). "Traders of the Plain". Saudi Aramco World: 34–42. Archived from the original on 18 February 2007. Retrieved 11 February 2007. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  49. ^ a b Coningham & Young 2015, p. 27. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFConinghamYoung2015 (help)
  50. ^ Coningham & Young 2015, p. 25. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFConinghamYoung2015 (help)
  51. ^ Manuel 2010, p. 148.
  52. ^ a b c d e Kenoyer 1997, p. 53.
  53. ^ Manuel 2010, p. 149.
  54. ^ Coningham & Young 2015, p. 145. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFConinghamYoung2015 (help)
  55. ^ Kenoyer 1991, p. 335.
  56. ^ Parpola & 2–15, p. 17.
  57. ^ a b Kenoyer 1991, p. 333.
  58. ^ Kenoyer 1991, p. 336.
  59. ^ a b Coningham & Young 2015, p. 28. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFConinghamYoung2015 (help)
  60. ^ K. McElreavy and L. Quintana-Murci (2005), A population genetics perspective of the Indus Valley through uniparentally-inherited markers
  61. ^ a b Dikshit 2013, pp. 129–133.
  62. ^ a b Mani 2008, pp. 237–238.
  63. ^ Sarkar 2006, pp. 2–3.
  64. ^ Coningham & Young 2015, p. 158. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFConinghamYoung2015 (help)
  65. ^ Ahmed 2014, p. 107.
  66. ^ a b c Archaeological Survey of India, Bhirrana, Dt.-Fatehabad, Haryana
  67. ^ a b c d Dikshit 2013, p. 129.
  68. ^ a b Dikshit 2013, p. 130.
  69. ^ Singh, Upinder (2008), A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India : from the Stone Age to the 12th century, New Delhi: Pearson Education, pp. 109, 145, ISBN 978-8131711200
  70. ^ "Stone age man used dentist drill".
  71. ^ UNESCO World Heritage. 2004. ". Archaeological Site of Mehrgarh
  72. ^ Hirst, K. Kris. 2005. "Mehrgarh". Guide to Archaeology
  73. ^ "Archeologists confirm Indian civilization is 2000 years older than previously believed, Jason Overdorf, Globalpost, 28 November 2012".
  74. ^ "Indus Valley 2,000 years older than thought". 4 November 2012.
  75. ^ "Archeologists confirm Indian civilization is 8000 years old, Jhimli Mukherjee Pandey, Times of India, 29 May 2016".
  76. ^ "History What their lives reveal". 4 January 2013.
  77. ^ "Haryana's Bhirrana oldest Harappan site, Rakhigarhi Asia's largest: ASI". The Times of India. 15 April 2015.
  78. ^ Dikshit 2013, pp. 132, 131.
  79. ^ Mani 2008, p. 237.
  80. ^ a b c d e f Gangal 2014.
  81. ^ Singh 2016, p. 5.
  82. ^ Parpola 2015, p. 17.
  83. ^ a b c Jean-Francois Jarrige Mehrgarh Neolithic Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Paper presented in the International Seminar on the "First Farmers in Global Perspective," Lucknow, India, 18–20 January 2006
  84. ^ Singh 2016.
  85. ^ Possehl GL (1999) Indus Age: The Beginnings. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press.
  86. ^ a b Jarrige JF (2008) Mehrgarh Neolithic. Pragdhara 18: 136–154
  87. ^ Costantini L (2008) The first farmers in Western Pakistan: the evidence of the Neolithic agropastoral settlement of Mehrgarh. Pragdhara 18: 167–178
  88. ^ Fuller DQ (2006) Agricultural origins and frontiers in South Asia: a working synthesis. J World Prehistory 20: 1–86
  89. ^ Petrie, CA; Thomas, KD (2012). "The topographic and environmental context of the earliest village sites in western South Asia". Antiquity. 86: 1055–1067. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00048249.
  90. ^ Goring-Morris, AN; Belfer-Cohen, A (2011). "Neolithization processes in the Levant: the outer envelope". Curr Anthropol. 52: S195–S208. doi:10.1086/658860.
  91. ^ Jarrige C (2008) The figurines of the first farmers at Mehrgarh and their offshoots. Pragdhara 18: 155–166
  92. ^ a b Harris DR (2010) Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia: An Environmental-Archaeological Study. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press.
  93. ^ a b Hiebert FT, Dyson RH (2002) Prehistoric Nishapur and frontier between Central Asia and Iran. Iranica Antiqua XXXVII: 113–149
  94. ^ Kuzmina EE, Mair VH (2008) The Prehistory of the Silk Road. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press
  95. ^ Alizadeh A (2003) Excavations at the prehistoric mound of Chogha Bonut, Khuzestan, Iran. Technical report, University of Chicago, Illinois.
  96. ^ Dolukhanov P (1994) Environment and Ethnicity in the Ancient Middle East. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  97. ^ Quintana-Murci, L; Krausz, C; Zerjal, T; Sayar, SH; Hammer, MF; et al. (2001). "Y-chromosome lineages trace diffusion of people and languages in Southwestern Asia". Am J Hum Genet. 68: 537–542. doi:10.1086/318200. PMC 1235289. PMID 11133362.
  98. ^ Quintana-Murci, L; Chaix, R; Spencer Wells, R; Behar, DM; Sayar, H; et al. (2004). "Where West meets East: the complex mtDNA landscape of the Southwest and Central Asian corridor". Am J Hum Genet. 74: 827–845. doi:10.1086/383236. PMC 1181978. PMID 15077202.
  99. ^ a b c Coningham & Young 2015, p. 114. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFConinghamYoung2015 (help)
  100. ^ Mascarenhas 2015, p. 9.
  101. ^ Narasimhan et al. 2018.
  102. ^ a b c Gallego Romero 2011, p. 9.
  103. ^ Gallego Romero 2011, p. 12.
  104. ^ Peter T. Daniels. The World's Writing Systems. Oxford University. p. 372.
  105. ^ Parpola, Asko (1994). Deciphering the Indus Script. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521430791.
  106. ^ Durrani, F.A. (1984). "Some Early Harappan sites in Gomal and Bannu Valleys". In Lal, B.B.; Gupta, S.P. (eds.). Frontiers of Indus Civilisation. Delhi: Books & Books. pp. 505–510.
  107. ^ Thapar, B.K. (1975). "Kalibangan: A Harappan Metropolis Beyond the Indus Valley". Expedition. 17 (2): 19–32.
  108. ^ Valentine, Benjamin (2015). "Evidence for Patterns of Selective Urban Migration in the Greater Indus Valley (2600–1900 BC): A Lead and Strontium Isotope Mortuary Analysis". PLOS One. 10 (4): e0123103. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1023103V. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123103. PMC 4414352. PMID 25923705.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  109. ^ "Indus Valley people migrated from villages to cities: New study".
  110. ^ a b c J.M. Kenoyer (2006), "Cultures and Societies of the Indus Tradition. In Historical Roots" in the Making of ‘the Aryan’, R. Thapar (ed.), pp. 21–49. New Delhi, National Book Trust.
  111. ^ Shaffer, Jim G.; Lichtenstein, Diane A. (1989). "Ethnicity and Change in the Indus Valley Cultural Tradition". Old Problems and New Perspectives in the Archaeology of South Asia. Wisconsin Archaeological Reports 2. pp. 117–126.
  112. ^ a b Bisht, R.S. (1982). "Excavations at Banawali: 1974–77". In Possehl Gregory L. (ed.). Harappan Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. pp. 113–124.
  113. ^ "Indus re-enters India after two centuries, feeds Little Rann, Nal Sarovar". India Today. 7 November 2011. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
  114. ^ Gregory L. Possehl (11 November 2002). The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective. Rowman Altamira. pp. 193–. ISBN 978-0-7591-1642-9.
  115. ^ It has been noted that the courtyard pattern and techniques of flooring of Harappan houses has similarities to the way house-building is still done in some villages of the region. Lal 2002, pp. 93–95
  116. ^ Morris, A.E.J. (1994). History of Urban Form: Before the Industrial Revolutions (Third ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 31. ISBN 978-0582301542. Retrieved 20 May 2015.
  117. ^ Rodda, J.C. and Ubertini, Lucio (2004). The Basis of Civilization – Water Science? p. 161. International Association of Hydrological Sciences (International Association of Hydrological Sciences Press 2004).
  118. ^ Gelderloos, Peter (2017). Worshiping Power: An Anarchist View of Early State Formation. Oakland: AK Press. p. 142.
  119. ^ Feuerstein, Georg; Kak, Subhash; Frawley, David (2001). In Search of the Cradle of Civilization:New Light on Ancient India. Quest Books. p. 73. ISBN 978-0835607414.
  120. ^ Sergent, Bernard (1997). Genèse de l'Inde (in French). Paris: Payot. p. 113. ISBN 978-2228891165.
  121. ^ Pruthi, Raj (2004). Prehistory and Harappan Civilization. APH Publishing. p. 260. ISBN 978-8176485814.
  122. ^ Coppa, A.; et al. (6 April 2006). "Early Neolithic tradition of dentistry: Flint tips were surprisingly effective for drilling tooth enamel in a prehistoric population" (PDF). Nature. 440 (7085): 755–756. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..755C. doi:10.1038/440755a. PMID 16598247.
  123. ^ McIntosh, Jane (2008). The Ancient Indus Valley: New Perspectives. ABC-CLIO. p. 248. ISBN 978-1576079072.
  124. ^ Lal 2002, p. 89
  125. ^ Keay, John, India, a History. New York: Grove Press, 2000.
  126. ^ Kenoyer, Jonathan Mark (1997). "Trade and Technology of the Indus Valley: New Insights from Harappa, Pakistan". World Archaeology. 29 (2: "High–Definition Archaeology: Threads Through the Past"): 262–280. doi:10.1080/00438243.1997.9980377.
  127. ^ a b Lal 2002, p. 82
  128. ^ John Keay (1988). India discovered. Collins. p. 172.
  129. ^ Marshall, Sir John. Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilisation, 3 vols, London: Arthur Probsthain, 1931
  130. ^ Hasenpflug, Rainer, The Inscriptions of the Indus civilisation Norderstedt, Germany, 2006.
  131. ^ Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India. p. 157. ISBN 978-8131711200.
  132. ^ Parpola 2005, pp. 2–3
  133. ^ Watson, Traci (29 April 2013). "Surprising Discoveries From the Indus Civilization". National Geographic.
  134. ^ Doniger, Wendy (2010). The Hindus: an alternative history. Oxford University Press. p. 67. ISBN 978-0199593347.
  135. ^ Neyland, R.S. (1992). "The seagoing vessels on Dilmun seals". In Keith, D.H.; Carrell T.L. (eds.). Underwater archaeology proceedings of the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference at Kingston, Jamaica 1992. Tucson, AZ: Society for Historical Archaeology. pp. 68–74.
  136. ^ a b Maurizio Tosi, "Black Boats of Magan. Some Thoughts on Bronze Age Water Transport in Oman and beyond from the Impressed Bitumen Slabs of Ra's al-Junayz", in A. Parpola (ed), South Asian Archaeology 1993, Helsinki, 1995, pp. 745–761 (in collaboration with Serge Cleuziou)
  137. ^ Daniel T. Potts (2009), Maritime Trade: Pre-Islamic Period iranicaonline.org
  138. ^ Maurizio Tosi: Die Indus-Zivilisation jenseits des indischen Subkontinents, in: Vergessene Städte am Indus, Mainz am Rhein 1987, ISBN 3805309570, S. 132–133
  139. ^ Story of Ras Al Jinz. Oman Information
  140. ^ Shaffer 1999 p.245
  141. ^ Jarrige, J.-F. (1986). "Excavations at Mehrgarh-Nausharo". Pakistan Archaeology. 10 (22): 63–131.
  142. ^ Shaffer and Liechtenstein 1995, 1999
  143. ^ Gallego Romero 2011.
  144. ^ Bates, J (1986). "Approaching rice domestication in South Asia: New evidence from Indus settlements in northern India". Journal of Archaeological Science. 78 (22): 193–201.
  145. ^ Bates, Jennifer (21 November 2016). "Rice farming in India much older than thought, used as 'summer crop' by Indus civilisation". Research. Retrieved 21 November 2016.
  146. ^ "Indus Writing Analysis by Asko Parpola".
  147. ^ Sanskrit has also contributed to Indus Civilization, Deccan Herald, 12 August 2012 [1]
  148. ^ a b c Heggarty & Renfrew 2014.
  149. ^ Cavalli-Sforza (1994), pp. 221–222.
  150. ^ a b Mukherjee 2001.
  151. ^ a b Derenko (2013).
  152. ^ Kivisild 1999, p. 1331.
  153. ^ a b Kivisild 1999, p. 1333.
  154. ^ a b Kumar 2004.
  155. ^ Palanichamy (2015), p. 645.
  156. ^ Wells, B. An Introduction to Indus Writing. Early Sites Research Society (West) Monograph Series, 2, Independence MO 1999
  157. ^ Farmer, Steve; Sproat, Richard; Witzel, Michael. "The Collapse of the Indus-Script Thesis: The Myth of a Literate Harappan Civilization" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  158. ^ These and other issues are addressed in Parpola (2005)
  159. ^ Rao, Rajesh P.N.; Yadav, Nisha; Vahia, Mayank N.; Joglekar, Hrishikesh; Adhikari, R.; Mahadevan, Iravatham (May 2009). "Entropic Evidence for Linguistic Structure in the Indus Script". Science. 324 (5931): 1165. Bibcode:2009Sci...324.1165R. doi:10.1126/science.1170391. PMID 19389998.
  160. ^ Indus Script Encodes Language, Reveals New Study of Ancient Symbols Newswise, Retrieved on 5 June 2009.
  161. ^ A Refutation of the Claimed Refutation of the Non-linguistic Nature of Indus Symbols: Invented Data Sets in the Statistical Paper of Rao et al. (Science, 2009) Retrieved on 19 September 2009.
  162. ^ a b 'Conditional Entropy' Cannot Distinguish Linguistic from Non-linguistic Systems Retrieved on 19 September 2009.
  163. ^ "This 360 tour of Kerala's Edakkal caves will mesmerise you". Indian Express. 2 January 2017.
  164. ^ keay.
  165. ^ Wright 2009, pp. 281–282.
  166. ^ a b Ratnagar, Shereen (April 2004). "Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation The Case of Ayodhya" (PDF). Current Anthropology. 45 (2): 239–259. doi:10.1086/381044. JSTOR 10.1086/381044.
  167. ^ a b Marshall 1931, pp. 48–78.
  168. ^ Possehl 2002, pp. 141–156. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFPossehl2002 (help)
  169. ^ a b Possehl 2002, pp. 141–144. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFPossehl2002 (help)
  170. ^ Srinivasan 1975.
  171. ^ Srinivasan 1997, pp. 180–181.
  172. ^ Sullivan 1964.
  173. ^ Hiltebeitel 2011, pp. 399–432.
  174. ^ Vilas Sangave (2001). Facets of Jainology: Selected Research Papers on Jain Society, Religion, and Culture. Popular Prakashan: Mumbai. ISBN 978-8171548392.
  175. ^ Zimmer, Heinrich (1969). Campbell, Joseph (ed.). Philosophies of India. NY: Princeton University Press. pp. 60, 208–209. ISBN 978-0691017587.
  176. ^ Thomas McEvilley (2002) The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies. Allworth Communications, Inc. 816 pages; ISBN 1581152035
  177. ^ a b Possehl 2002, pp. 141–145. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFPossehl2002 (help)
  178. ^ McIntosh 2008, pp. 286–287. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFMcIntosh2008 (help)
  179. ^ Marshall 1931, p. 67.
  180. ^ Possehl 2002, p. 18. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFPossehl2002 (help)
  181. ^ Thapar 2004, p. 85.
  182. ^ McIntosh 2008, pp. 275–277, 292. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFMcIntosh2008 (help)
  183. ^ Possehl 2002, pp. 152, 157–176. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFPossehl2002 (help)
  184. ^ McIntosh 2008, pp. 293–299. sfn error: multiple targets (3×): CITEREFMcIntosh2008 (help)
  185. ^ Robbins Schug, G; Gray, K.M.; Mushrif, V.; Sankhyan, A.R. (November 2012). "A Peaceful Realm? Trauma and Social Differentiation at Harappa". International Journal of Paleopathology. 2 (2–3): 136–147. doi:10.1016/j.ijpp.2012.09.012. PMID 29539378.
  186. ^ Robbins Schug, G; Blevins, K. Elaine; Cox, Brett; Gray, Kelsey; Mushrif-Tripathy, Veena (December 2013). "Infection, Disease, and Biosocial Process at the End of the Indus Civilization". PLOS One. 0084814 (12): e84814. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...884814R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084814. PMC 3866234. PMID 24358372.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  187. ^ Upinder Singh (2008), A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India From the Stone Age to the 12th Century, p. 181
  188. ^ "Late Harappan Localization Era Map".
  189. ^ McIntosh, Jane (2008). The Ancient Indus Valley: New Perspectives.
  190. ^ Upinder Singh (2008), A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India From the Stone Age to the 12th Century, p. 211
  191. ^ U. Singh (2008), pp. 181, 223
  192. ^ a b U. Singh (2008), pp. 180–181
  193. ^ a b U. Singh (2008), p. 211
  194. ^ Kenoyer (2006).
  195. ^ McIntosh (2008), pp. 91, 98
  196. ^ F.R. Allchin (ed.), The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: The Emergence of Cities and States (Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 36
  197. ^ Allchin (ed., 1995), pp. 37–38
  198. ^ Edwin Bryant (2001). The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture. pp. 159–160.
  199. ^ J.P. Mallory and Douglas Q. Adams (eds., 1997), Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, p. 102
  200. ^ Bridget and Raymond Allchin (1982), The Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan, p. 246
  201. ^ Mallory & Adams 1997, pp. 102–103.
  202. ^ David Knipe (1991), Hinduism. San Francisco: Harper
  203. ^ "Decline of Bronze Age 'megacities' linked to climate change".
  204. ^ Emma Maris (2014), Two-hundred-year drought doomed Indus Valley Civilization, nature
  205. ^ a b c "Indus Collapse: The End or the Beginning of an Asian Culture?". Science Magazine. 320: 1282–1283. 6 June 2008.
  206. ^ International Commission on Stratigraphy. "Collapse of civilizations worldwide defines youngest unit of the Geologic Time Scale". News and Meetings. Retrieved 15 July 2018.
  207. ^ a b Clift et al., 2011, U-Pb zircon dating evidence for a Pleistocene Sarasvati River and capture of the Yamuna River, Geology, 40, 211–214 (2011). [2]
  208. ^ a b Tripathi, Jayant K.; Bock, Barbara; Rajamani, V.; Eisenhauer, A. (25 October 2004). "Is River Ghaggar, Saraswati? Geochemical Constraints" (PDF). Current Science. 87 (8). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 December 2004. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  209. ^ Rachel Nuwer (28 May 2012). "An Ancient Civilization, Upended by Climate Change". LiveScience. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  210. ^ Charles Choi (29 May 2012). "Huge Ancient Civilization's Collapse Explained". New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
  211. ^ Thomas H. Maugh II (28 May 2012). "Migration of monsoons created, then killed Harappan civilization". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 29 May 2012.
  212. ^ Dixit, Yama; Hodell, David A.; Giesche, Alena; Tandon, Sampat K.; Gázquez, Fernando; Saini, Hari S.; Skinner, Luke C.; Mujtaba, Syed A.I.; Pawar, Vikas (9 March 2018). "Intensified summer monsoon and the urbanization of Indus Civilization in northwest India". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 4225. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.4225D. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22504-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5844871. PMID 29523797.
  213. ^ A. Grijalva, K; L. Kovach, R; M. Nur, A (1 December 2006). "Evidence for Tectonic Activity During the Mature Harappan Civilization, 2600-1800 BCE". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
  214. ^ Prasad, Manika; Nur, Amos (1 December 2001). "Tectonic Activity during the Harappan Civilization". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
  215. ^ L. Kovach, Robert; Grijalva, Kelly; Nur, Amos (1 October 2010). Earthquakes and civilizations of the Indus Valley: A challenge for archaeoseismology. Geological Society of America Special Papers. Vol. 471. pp. 119–127. doi:10.1130/2010.2471(11). ISBN 978-0813724713. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  216. ^ Warrier, Shrikala. Kamandalu: The Seven Sacred Rivers of Hinduism. Mayur University. p. 125.
  217. ^ James Heitzman, The City in South Asia (Routledge, 2008), pp. 12–13
  218. ^ a b Shaffer, Jim (1993). "Reurbanization: The eastern Punjab and beyond". In Spodek, Howard; Srinivasan, Doris M. (eds.). Urban Form and Meaning in South Asia: The Shaping of Cities from Prehistoric to Precolonial Times.
  219. ^ Harappan Civilisation and Rojdi, by Gregory L. Possehl and M.H. Raval (1989) https://books.google.com/books?id=LtgUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA19#v=onepage&q&f=false
  220. ^ White, David Gordon (2003). Kiss of the Yogini. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-0226894836.
  221. ^ Mode, H. (1944). Indische Frühkulturen und ihre Beziehungen zum Westen. Basel.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  222. ^ John Haywood, The Penguin Historical Atlas of Ancient Civilizations, Penguin Books, London, 2005, p. 76
  223. ^ Iran Almanac and Book of Facts. Echo Institute. p. 59. city of Shahr-e-Sukhteh near the Afghanistan border, an area which has been aptly [...] point on the trade routes between the Indus Valley, the Persian Gulf and Mesopotamia
  224. ^ a b Podany, Amanda H. (2012). Brotherhood of Kings: How International Relations Shaped the Ancient Near East. Oxford University Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0199718290.
  225. ^ Piesinger, Constance Maria (1983). Legacy of Dilmun: The Roots of Ancient Maritime Trade in Eastern Coastal Arabia in the 4th/3rd Millennium B.C. University of Wisconsin. p. 668. Rare finds of square seals with Indus script have been found in Mesopotamia
  226. ^ Joan Aruz; Ronald Wallenfels (2003). Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. p. 246. ISBN 978-1588390431. Square-shaped Indus seals of fired steatite have been found at a few sites in Mesopotamia.
  227. ^ Witzel, Michael (1999). "Substrate Languages in Old Indo-Aryan (Ṛgvedic, Middle and Late Vedic)" (PDF). Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies. 5 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016.
  228. ^ Witzel, Michael (February 2000). "The Languages of Harappa" (PDF). Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Coningham, Robin; Young, Ruth (2015), The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c. 6500 BCE – 200 CE, Cambridge University Press

External links