Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
M.Bitton (talk | contribs)
Line 63: Line 63:
:The sources that you added do not add anything in substance, they just say that he was Maghrebi which he obviously was just like Francisco Pizarro was southern european but also Spanish, Maghrebi just like Southern European refers to a group of people from a region made up of various countries and nationalities, you are not explaining here why it is "anachronistic" , throwing a random word out out of nowhere without explanation and reverting edits is very problematic.. [[User:HamHammm|HamHammm]] ([[User talk:HamHammm|talk]]) 19:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
:The sources that you added do not add anything in substance, they just say that he was Maghrebi which he obviously was just like Francisco Pizarro was southern european but also Spanish, Maghrebi just like Southern European refers to a group of people from a region made up of various countries and nationalities, you are not explaining here why it is "anachronistic" , throwing a random word out out of nowhere without explanation and reverting edits is very problematic.. [[User:HamHammm|HamHammm]] ([[User talk:HamHammm|talk]]) 19:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
:: I don't see the problem with Maghrebi, this is far back in history and accurate borders to difficult. --[[User:StellarNerd|StellarNerd]] ([[User talk:StellarNerd|talk]]) 19:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
:: I don't see the problem with Maghrebi, this is far back in history and accurate borders to difficult. --[[User:StellarNerd|StellarNerd]] ([[User talk:StellarNerd|talk]]) 19:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
::Your edit warring and unwillingness to communicate (despite the comments left on your talk page and the ping from here) is what's problematic. There was no such thing as "Moroccan", "Algerian", Tunisian" or a concept of nationality back then (other than belonging to the Maghreb, as opposed to the Mashreq, and being Muslims, Jews, Christians, etc.). [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 20:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:13, 20 June 2022

Template:Vital article

Former good articleIbn Battuta was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 19, 2004Refreshing brilliant proseNot kept
December 20, 2005Good article nomineeListed
February 6, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Junk (ship)

Ibn Battuta fans do know about massive Chinese "Junk (ship)" located at the Indian ports, also that the "Champa people" were inspired by "Vijayanagar Kingdom" and religion. 137.59.221.36 (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orhan?

Praise for "Ottoman Turk" is very outrageous because Sultan Orhan was unknown warlord compared to the well known rulers of "Constantinople".

Ibn Battuta works are being manipulated in the wrong manner! 137.59.221.36 (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khan of the Golden Horde

Ibn Battuta described precisely the character and behaviour and lifestyle of "Ozbeg Khan of the Golden Horde" in what is known as Eurasia.

Ibn Battuta description of that character should be commended in this article. 137.59.221.36 (talk) 20:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)\\\\\\20:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)~\ 137.59.221.36 (talk) 20:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tennasserim as another possible candidate for "Tawalisi"?

While the two place names may not look similar in English spelling, in Thai, Tenasserim is pronounced more like "Da-now-si", so perhaps it's that? Also in "A History of Ayutthaya: Siam in the Early Modern World", the city-state of Ayutthaya, prior to it's formal date of foundation in 1351 CE, was more similar to its Maritime Southeast Asian neighbors, who were raiding down the Malay Peninsula at this time, whose customs were described by Fei Shin, a scribe on Zheng He's voyages in the early 15th century,"The customs are violent and fierce: they particularly respect bravery. They invade and despoil neighboring regions … and are practiced and skillful at fighting on water." (Baker, Phongpaichit, 49) I don't believe, however, that Ayutthaya did subjugate the region until the 16th century.

Women also played an integral part in Ayutthaya society, often becoming the leaders of commoner households and heads of society while the men were off being conscripted to fight in wars or perform corvee labor for the king/state, so that kind of negates the idea that women can't be in charge on the mainland, even less so on the Malay peninsula.

Tennasserim was also named on the De Fauro map in c. 1459, one of the earliest maps that payed attention to detail to Mainland Southeast Asia Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

korean medival period

please make one on it too 182.68.26.13 (talk) 04:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

The following two comments were copied from HamHammm's talk page?

As I previously mentioned, describing him as "Moroccan" is obviously anachronistic. If sources is all you're after, you could have asked for them (I added a couple of reliable sources to prevent further disruption). M.Bitton (talk) 19:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What part of what I said or the reliable sources that were added do you disagree with? M.Bitton (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sources that you added do not add anything in substance, they just say that he was Maghrebi which he obviously was just like Francisco Pizarro was southern european but also Spanish, Maghrebi just like Southern European refers to a group of people from a region made up of various countries and nationalities, you are not explaining here why it is "anachronistic" , throwing a random word out out of nowhere without explanation and reverting edits is very problematic.. HamHammm (talk) 19:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the problem with Maghrebi, this is far back in history and accurate borders to difficult. --StellarNerd (talk) 19:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit warring and unwillingness to communicate (despite the comments left on your talk page and the ping from here) is what's problematic. There was no such thing as "Moroccan", "Algerian", Tunisian" or a concept of nationality back then (other than belonging to the Maghreb, as opposed to the Mashreq, and being Muslims, Jews, Christians, etc.). M.Bitton (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]