Legality of Cannabis by U.S. Jurisdiction

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
reply
Line 6: Line 6:
I think your username is misleading. I think you should either change it or make your signature show that it is your username. – [[User:Ilovemydoodle|Ilovemydoodle]] ([[User talk:Ilovemydoodle|talk]]) 06:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
I think your username is misleading. I think you should either change it or make your signature show that it is your username. – [[User:Ilovemydoodle|Ilovemydoodle]] ([[User talk:Ilovemydoodle|talk]]) 06:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
: How is my username misleading? An actual unregistered user would just be an IP address, which is just a bunch of numbers. [[User:Unnamed anon|Unnamed anon]] ([[User talk:Unnamed anon#top|talk]]) 06:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
: How is my username misleading? An actual unregistered user would just be an IP address, which is just a bunch of numbers. [[User:Unnamed anon|Unnamed anon]] ([[User talk:Unnamed anon#top|talk]]) 06:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

== Reply ==

As you archived the thread before I could reply, Schnapp does not say "Will is not gay" in the source you linked. He said it's "open to interpretation", and whether or not Will is gay is "beside the point", and questioned whether liking certain things makes one gay. It's not an ''explicit'' denial, which is what I sought after you claimed so. As I said, this was not the point anyway. Claiming Schnapp said Will is not gay when he didn't explicitly say so and claiming Technoblade's tweet was "not proven to exist" when it's still up on Twitter are to me hot takes. Also, you misinterpreted what I said. I said you have received more ''notices about sanctions applying to all editors editing in controversial topic areas'' than I had ever seen. I didn't say sanctions applying to you only. But you have also received a lot of guidance from editors based on your apparent heated arguments with others over controversial topics, and I'm saying you need to be careful going forward. It's not bad advice, it's good because from a glance at your contributions, since registering you have gone to a lot of divisive topic areas in the news. If it's all an editor does, and with a name like "Unnamed anon", it looks like trying to stir up arguments for the sake of it. I reiterate: I don't think "be careful with doing this" is bad advice based on what I see. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 07:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:17, 5 July 2022

Username

I think your username is misleading. I think you should either change it or make your signature show that it is your username. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is my username misleading? An actual unregistered user would just be an IP address, which is just a bunch of numbers. Unnamed anon (talk) 06:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

As you archived the thread before I could reply, Schnapp does not say "Will is not gay" in the source you linked. He said it's "open to interpretation", and whether or not Will is gay is "beside the point", and questioned whether liking certain things makes one gay. It's not an explicit denial, which is what I sought after you claimed so. As I said, this was not the point anyway. Claiming Schnapp said Will is not gay when he didn't explicitly say so and claiming Technoblade's tweet was "not proven to exist" when it's still up on Twitter are to me hot takes. Also, you misinterpreted what I said. I said you have received more notices about sanctions applying to all editors editing in controversial topic areas than I had ever seen. I didn't say sanctions applying to you only. But you have also received a lot of guidance from editors based on your apparent heated arguments with others over controversial topics, and I'm saying you need to be careful going forward. It's not bad advice, it's good because from a glance at your contributions, since registering you have gone to a lot of divisive topic areas in the news. If it's all an editor does, and with a name like "Unnamed anon", it looks like trying to stir up arguments for the sake of it. I reiterate: I don't think "be careful with doing this" is bad advice based on what I see. Ss112 07:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]