This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemicals: Core Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist. Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Archives

1

A google search of "cycloethane" gives a lot of questions (more questions than answers). I did my due diligence and found a respectable source for this rare/controversial term. I updated this page with info about this term. I did NOT put this in the headline... in fact it appeared near the END of the page! I also included objections to this term BEFORE the justification. But almost immediately (within 10 minutes) after posting, my edit was reversed by *classified*.

I posted this edit with a verifiable source. I also included objections AND justifications in my edit to provide a fair-and-balanced view of the term "cycloethane".

Yet my edit was almost immediately retracted. This isn't how Wikipedia should work, IMHO.

Sure, if I was just giving my personal opinion, or if I was just giving the "google" opinion then this would be understandable.

But if I post an edit with a reliable/verifiable source, shouldn't this be AT LEAST open for debate... instead of immediate deletion?

Because my original post was deleted, I can't be 100% sure, but I believe my edit was approximately:

   "Ethylene is rarely (and controversially) named 'cycloethane'.  It is controversial because... It is justified because..."
   [with reference to "Basic Principles of Organic Chemistry" (second edition, page 483, ISBN 0-8053-8329-8)]

For the love of God, what was wrong with my edit? Except for being unpopular?? Can we talk about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydradix (talk • contribs) 21:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure the stuff that dandilions release (ethylene) is the same substance that can be found from crude oil? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Ethylene biosynthesis can be induced by endogenous or exogenous ethylene." this sentence seems to be flawed, as it means effectively that ethylene production in a plant will be triggered by the presence of ethylene (either produced by the same plant, or coming from somewhere else). so it means once there is ethylene present there will be more of it produced, but this fails to account for what started the process to start with and also suggests that it is a self-inducing chain reaction while the same is not said by the previous - more detailed - part of the desription of the process. please remove and/or make more clear this sentence.80.98.114.70 (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ethylene/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 22:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ethylene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060903081507/http://www.chem.yale.edu/~chem125/125/history99/5Valence/Nomenclature/Hofmannaeiou.html to http://www.chem.yale.edu/~chem125/125/history99/5Valence/Nomenclature/Hofmannaeiou.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/iuclid-datasheet/74851.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061113092037/http://www.novachem.com/ProductServices/docs/Ethylene_MSDS_EN.pdf to http://www.novachem.com/productservices/docs/Ethylene_MSDS_EN.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

= due to the 2× bond. So we can write:

• = +H
  ₂→ - + E
• - + E → = +H
  ₂

Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a long time since I studied chemistry, but I'm surprised that Ethene redirects to Ethylene, rather than the other way around. Ethene has been the IUPAC name for this compound for a long time now and while ethylene may be in more common use, I cannot see that being a good argument for not listing a chemical compound under its official name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.154.136 (talk) 02:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia titles articles by their common name (see WP:COMMONNAME). For this reason many (most?) articles about chemical compounds are not titled using IUPAC nomenclature. ChemNerd (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The role of ethylene as a plant hormone is a big area and pretty different from the usual chemical/petrochemical aspects. Also it looks like increasing amount of primary literature is creeping into article. So if we split, readers might find the info more useful. The parent article would of course retain brief mention of the hormone aspect.--Smokefoot (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hazchem code 2409:4071:D81:B5D5:3947:F549:5D75:618D (talk) 08:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]