A new user created this article removing the redirect in the process. Apparently a caste warrior, they seem to be adding OR, as seen here, which was reverted by me. My concern is about the newly created article. Have a look, also @Ekdalian and Ratnahastin:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has very poor sourcing from what I can see, all sources have no page number, some only have a snippet view. They've used translations of religious texts such as Shikshapatri ,Brahma Purana and Shrimad Bhagwatam [1][2][3] as references. They've also cited Sathya Sai Baba's discourses as a source. [4] I also see some non academic self published sources such as Sharma,Anurag(2022)[5]. Ratnahastin (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Ratnahastin.

Fylindfotberserk, I have posted messages including DS alert on the user talk page. The article definitely requires review and removal of poorly sourced content & OR (POV-pushing)! Couldn't manage enough time today. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am impressed with your work on Pushtimarga. I had created the Pushimarg Baithak article but could not fix the main article. Swadhyaya Movement also needs your attention as you did with Pushtimarga Sampradaya. Except first two sections, all of the article is uncited. There are several scholarly sources for the subject. Thank you,- Nizil (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nizil Shah. Thank you for the appreciation of my additions at Pushtimarga Sampradaya. At this time, I do not have much interest in improving the Swadhyaya Movement article beyond surface level removals of blatantly unencyclopedic content. Hopefully editors will take that article places and make some good changes. Chariotrider555 (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Siddiqui has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 6 § Siddiqui until a consensus is reached. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hindu calendar

added links pointing to Capricorn, Scorpio, Aquarius, Leo, Taurus, Gemini, Aries, Virgo, Libra and Sagittarius

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I would like to ask why you reverted my edit on the Gandhara page lead. Me and Sutyarashi had a discussion on the talk page about the lead and I had implemented some of his criticism (unneccessary vocabulary), whilst asking him that if he had any other issues we can discuss further on the talk page which he did not reply to even after multiple hours, so I find your reasoning for reverting needing further explanation as personally 'Reverting to a stable version' is not a valid excuse especially after we had a civil discussion about the lead.

Based off of the WP:Reverting you didnt say what you object to nor considered what can be improved on or partially reverted which was already being discussed on the talk page to avoid an edit war and to follow wikipedias rule of reverting civilly.

Thanks Zenithxxx (talk) 14:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahyavanshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parmar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change Vishnu image add suitable infobox Image of Vishnu. This is image of suitable liscence, can you add this image to Vishnu. @Chariotrider555 @Redtigerxyz

Hegajsm Hegajsm (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]